40 research outputs found

    Reply to commentary by R Duggleby (2019)

    Get PDF
    Duggleby (2018) has made a numerical analysis of some aspects of the wide range of phenomena we reviewed in Steele et al. (2018) and asserted " .that panspermia as proposed by Steele et al. (2018) is extremely implausible.” It seems to us that Duggleby has based his viewpoint on a quite narrow and specific model of Panspermia which he supposes to be active in the cosmos. Here we address both his conclusions and his numerical analysis. Our response therefore will be at two levels, his specific analysis and his general conclusions. In the specific section below we show that while Duggleby's numerical analysis appears in part correct it is, in the final analysis, quite irrelevant to Cosmic Panspermia. In the general response which follows we address his unsupported conclusion throughout his critique, namely that … " none of the examples mentioned by Steele et al. (2018) is decisive enough to allow no other explanation.

    Molecular cloning and characterization of the ovine CYP11B1 promoter

    No full text
    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International3361169-1178BMBI

    Structure of an ovine CYP11B1 gene

    No full text
    DNA Sequence - Journal of DNA Sequencing and Mapping86357-374DNSE
    corecore