242 research outputs found

    Compounds And Methods For Treating Bone Disorders And Controlling Weight

    Get PDF
    The present invention provides peptides and methods of their use in treating bone disorders and bone-related conditions and in treating obesity

    Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and their role in controlling IGF actions

    Get PDF
    The insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs) area family of six proteins that bind to insulin-like growth factor-I and -II with very high affinity. Because their affinity constants are between two- and 50-fold greater than the IGF-I receptor, they control the distribution of the IGFs among soluble IGFBPs in interstitial fluids, IGFBPs bound to cell surfaces or extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell surface receptors. Although there are six forms of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, most interstitial fluids contain only three or four forms, and usually only one or two predominate. The proteins differ significantly in their biochemical characteristics, and this accounts for many of the differences that have been observed in their biological actions. Several different types of protease cleave these binding proteins. Proteolytic cleavage generally inactivates the binding proteins or reduces their ability to bind to IGF-I or -II substantially. Several cell types have been shown to secrete these proteases; therefore, the factors that regulate protease activity can control binding protein actions indirectly. Other post-translational modifications, such as glycosylation and phosphorylation, have been shown to alter IGF binding protein activity. While binding protein actions have been studied extensively in vitro, many of the in vivo activities of these proteins remain to be defined

    Metabolic Actions of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I in Normal Physiology and Diabetes

    Get PDF
    Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is closely related to insulin but has distinct metabolic actions. IGF-I is an important stimulant of protein synthesis in muscle but it also stimulates free fatty acid utilization. Important indirect effects of IGF-I that influence metabolism include suppression of growth hormone secretion and at supraphysiologic concentrations suppression of insulin secretion. IGF-I actions are regulated by IGF binding proteins and in obesity and metabolic syndrome there is major dysregulation of IGF binding protein secretion resulting in alterations in the concentration of free IGF-I and IGF-I actions. In type 1 diabetes, IGF-I synthesis is markedly impaired and in type 2 diabetes multiple changes occur in IGF-I actions including sensitization to its mitogenic actions in some target tissues. Administration of IGF-I to patients with extreme insulin resistance results in improvement in glycemic control and IGF-I has been shown to be associated with lowering glucose and enhancing insulin sensitivity in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. However diabetics are also quite sensitive to stimulation of side effects in response to IGF-I and this has greatly limited its usefulness as a hypoglycemic agent. IGF-I coordinately links growth hormone and insulin actions as well as having direct effects on intermediary metabolism

    The insulin-like growth factors

    Get PDF
    "The insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) are single-chain polypeptides with structural homology to proinsulin. They regulate proliferation and differentiation of a multitude of cell types and are capable of exerting insulin-like metabolic effects. Unlike insulin, they are produced by most tissues of the body and are abundant in the circulation. Thus the IGFs have the potential to act via endocrine as well as autocrine andlor paracrine mechanisms. The IGFs exert their effects at the cellular level by interacting with the Type-I IGF receptor (IGF-I receptor). They also bind to the Type II1mannose- 6-phosphate receptor (IGF-II receptor) and insulin receptors, as well as high affinity binding proteins (IGFBPs). Like the IGFs, the IGFBPs are produced by multiple cell types and have been shown to modulate IGF bioactivity. The recent availability of cDNA probes and antibodies for the IGFs, IGF receptors, and IGFBPs has led to a substantial increase in published studies of IGF physiology. This review attempts to integrate recent information regarding coordinate regulation and function of the IGFs, their receptors, and IGFBPs.

    Down-regulation of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 during Hyperglycemia Induces Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Dedifferentiation

    Get PDF
    Diabetes is a major risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, but the mechanism by which hyperglycemia accelerates lesion development is not well defined. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) signal through the scaffold protein insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1). In diabetes, IRS-1 is down-regulated, and cells become resistant to insulin. Under these conditions, the IGF-I receptor signals through an alternate scaffold protein, SHPS-1, resulting in pathophysiologic stimulation of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration and proliferation. These studies were undertaken to determine whether IRS-1 is functioning constitutively to maintain VSMCs in their differentiated state and, thereby, inhibit aberrant signaling. Here we show that deletion of IRS-1 expression in VSMCs in non-diabetic mice results in dedifferentiation, SHPS-1 activation, and aberrant signaling and that these changes parallel those that occur in response to hyperglycemia. The mice showed enhanced sensitivity to IGF-I stimulation of VSMC proliferation and a hyperproliferative response to vascular injury. KLF4, a transcription factor that induces VSMC dedifferentiation, was up-regulated in IRS-1āˆ’/āˆ’ mice, and the differentiation inducer myocardin was undetectable. Importantly, these changes were replicated in wild-type mice during hyperglycemia. These findings illuminate a new function of IRS-1: that of maintaining cells in their normal, differentiated state. Because IRS-1 is down-regulated in states of insulin resistance that occur in response to metabolic stresses such as obesity and cytokine stimulation, the findings provide a mechanism for understanding how patients with metabolic stress and/or diabetes are predisposed to developing vascular complications

    Regulation of IGF-I Signaling in Retinal Endothelial Cells by Hyperglycemia

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE. To investigate the role of hyperglycemia in regulating the proliferative response of retinal endothelial cells (RECs) to insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. METHODS. The regulation of IGF-I signaling by glucose concentration was assessed by biochemical analysis of primary RECs grown in media containing normal (5 mM) and high (25 mM) glucose. Cell counting was used to asses the proliferative response to IGF-I. RESULTS. Glucose (25 mM) enhanced the proliferative response of RECs to IGF-I. Phosphorylation of the adaptor protein She (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 1) was increased in RECs grown in high glucose. For She to be phosphorylated, it must be recruited to the cytoplasmic domain of the transmembrane protein SHPS-1 (SHP substrate-1). She recruitment to SHPS-1 was increased when RECs were grown in high glucose. The difference in She recruitment to SHPS-1 was attributable to a difference in SHPS-1 phosphorylation that is required for She recruitment. This, in turn, was attributable to an increase in SHPS-1 association with integrin-associated protein (IAP), which is necessary for SHPS-1 phosphorylation. The difference in response under the two different glucose conditions appeared to be attributable to changes in the activation of the integrin Ī±VĪ²3, since blocking Ī±VĪ²3 in high glucose inhibited the response to IGF-I, whereas addition of the active region of vitronectin to RECs grown in normal glucose enhanced their response. CONCLUSIONS. This study demonstrates that hyperglycemic conditions enhance the response of RECs to IGF-I by increasing the association of IAP with SHPS-1 permitting the formation of the SHPS-1-Shc signaling complex, which is required for the proliferative response to IGF-I

    Interpreting growth hormone and IGF-I results using modern assays and reference ranges for the monitoring of treatment effectiveness in acromegaly

    Get PDF
    Standard treatment for acromegaly focuses on the achievement of target absolute levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I). The appropriateness of these targets when measured using modern assay methods is not well defined. This paper reviews biochemical status assessed using methods available at the time and associated clinical outcomes. GH measurements were shown to provide an indication of changes in tumor size, and failure of GH suppression after glucose stimulation is associated with tumor recurrence. IGF-I levels were more closely associated with changes in symptoms and signs. Reduced GH and IGF-I concentrations were shown to be associated with increased longevity, although the degree of increase has only been analyzed for GH. Lowering of GH and IGF-I has consistently been associated with improved outcomes; however, absolute levels reported in previous studies were based on results from methods and reference ranges that are now obsolete. Applying previously described absolute thresholds as targets (e.g. ā€œnormalā€ IGF-I level) when using current methods is best applied to those with active acromegaly symptoms who could benefit from further lowering of biochemical markers. In asymptomatic individuals with mild IGF-I or GH elevations, targeting biochemical ā€œnormalizationā€ would result in the need for combination pharmacotherapy in many patients without proven benefit. Measurement of both GH and IGF-I remains an essential component of diagnosis and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment in acromegaly; however, treatment goals based only on previously identified absolute thresholds are not appropriate without taking into account the assay and reference ranges being employed. Treatment goals should be individualized considering biochemical improvement from an untreated baseline, symptoms of disease, risks, burdens and costs of complex treatment regimens, comorbidities, and quality of life

    Differential Expression and Biological Effects of Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-4 and -5 in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

    Get PDF
    Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) plays an important role in regulating vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. The bioactivity of IGF-I is modulated by a group of high affinity, specific binding proteins (IGF-binding proteins; IGFBPs) that are present in the interstitial fluid. Previously, we have reported that porcine VSMCs synthesize and secrete IGF-I and several forms of IGFBPs, including IGFBP-2, IGFBP-4, and IGFBP-5. In this study, we examined the role of autocrine/paracrine secreted IGF-I in controlling the expression of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 as well as the effects of these IGFBPs in modulating the cellular replication response to IGF-I. The concentrations of IGFBP-4 in the conditioned medium increased significantly from <50 ng/ml to 742 +/- 105 ng/ml. This increase was associated with a decrease in the activity of an IGF-I-regulated IGFBP-4 protease. In contrast, the synthesis of IGFBP-5 was inversely correlated with culture density, and its concentration decreased from 792 +/- 91 to 44 +/- 14 ng/ml. IGFBP-5 mRNA in sparse cultures was 3-fold higher compared with those in confluent cultures. This culture density-dependent change in IGFBP-5 mRNA correlated closely with endogenous IGF-I levels. Since treatment of VSMC with exogenous IGF-I increased IGFBP-5 mRNA levels, we neutralized the effect of endogenously secreted IGF-I with an anti-IGF-I antibody to determine if it would alter IGFBP-5 mRNA abundance. This resulted in a 4.4-fold decrease in IGFBP-5 mRNA levels. When added together with IGF-I, exogenous IGFBP-4 inhibited IGF-I-induced DNA synthesis in a concentration-dependent manner. IGFBP-5, on the other hand, potentiated the effect of IGF-I. Therefore, IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 appear to be differentially regulated by autocrine/paracrine IGF-I through distinct mechanisms. These two proteins, in turn, play opposing roles in modulating IGF-I action in stimulating VSMC proliferation

    Blocking ligand occupancy of the Ā VĀ 3 integrin inhibits insulin-like growth factor I signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells

    Get PDF
    Blocking alphaVbeta3 integrin occupancy results in attenuation of the cellular migration response to insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). To determine whether integrin antagonists alter other IGF-I-stimulated biologic actions, quiescent smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were exposed to echistatin and their ability to respond to IGF-I was determined. Echistatin (10(-7) M) inhibited IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis by 80%, and the protein synthesis response also was inhibited. Therefore blocking occupancy of alphaVbeta3 inhibited multiple target cell actions of IGF-I. To determine whether blocking alphaVbeta3 occupancy could alter IGF-I receptor-mediated signal transduction, the ability of IGF-I to stimulate phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) was analyzed. A 10-min exposure to 100 ng/ml of IGF-I resulted in a substantial increase in phosphorylated IRS-1, and echistatin (10(-7) M) blocked the IGF-I-induced IRS-1 phosphorylation response. Echistatin also attenuated downstream signaling because the capacity of the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI-3 kinase) to bind to IRS-1 was blocked. In contrast, exposure of SMCs to vitronectin (1.0 micrograms/cm2) or thrombospondin (0.25 micrograms/cm2), two known ligands for alphaVbeta3, resulted in enhancement of the IGF-I-stimulated IRS-1 response. To determine whether these effects were caused by alterations in receptor kinase activity, the IGF-I receptor was immunoprecipitated and then analyzed for phosphotyrosine. Echistatin (10(-7) M) significantly reduced IGF-I-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of the IGF-I receptor beta subunit. We conclude that occupancy of the alphaVbeta3 integrin is necessary for IGF-I to fully activate the kinase activity of the IGF-I receptor and phosphorylate IRS-1. Activation of the alphaVbeta3 receptor results in an interaction with the IGF-I signal transduction pathway, which modulates SMCs responsiveness to IGF-I
    • ā€¦
    corecore