21 research outputs found

    fledging_success

    No full text
    Data to estimate fledging success (FS, see equation S2 in Supporting Information). Variables: BROOD - brood ID, MAHATCH - hatching date (number of days since 1 March), FLED - whether the brood fledged any chicks (1) or not (0). FS was estimated at the middle of the four periods: 49, 72, 95, 117.5 days since 1 March

    chick_sex

    No full text
    Data to estimate brood sex ratio at fledging (BSR, see equation S1 in Supporting Information). Variables: BROOD - brood ID, MALE - number of male chicks in the brood, FEMALE - number of female chicks in the brood, MAHATCH - hatching date (number of days since 1 March), AGE - brood age at capture. BSR was estimated at the middle of the four periods: 49, 72, 95, 117.5 days since 1 March

    brood_size

    No full text
    Data to estimate number of broods hatched (B) and average brood size (BS) for the four periods. Variables: BROOD - brood ID, MAHATCH - hatching date (number of days since 1 March), BROODSIZE - number of chicks hatched, PERIOD - categorical variable giving the four periods

    HFC_KP

    No full text
    Heterozygosity, survival, tarsus and mass growth of Kentish plover chicks hatched at Tuzla, Southern Turke

    Location and assignment to genetic clusters of ten subpopulations of <i>Phelsuma guimbeaui</i>.

    No full text
    <p><b>a</b> Subpopulations used for the microsatellite analyses. Colours in the pie charts indicate the proportion of genetic clusters identified using STRUCTURE 2.3.2. The three subpopulations only used for mtDNA analyses (L11, L12 and L13) are also shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0093387#pone-0093387-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2a</a>; subpopulations marked with an asterisk are in the Black River mountains. <b>b</b> Bar plots showing the genetic identity of individual samples generated using STRUCTURE 2.3.2. <b>c</b> Bar plot output from TESS with each subpopulation's labelling assignment (%) from GENECLASS2 shown below. The box gives details of each subpopulation (Subpop): vegetation (Veg) was classified as exotic campeche forest (C), exotic eucalyptus forest (E), exotic mango orchard (M), native forest (N) and exotic terminalia forest (T); size is the area (km<sup>2</sup>) occupied by each subpopulation.</p

    Population statistics of the concatenated mtDNA sequences for 13 subpopulations of <i>Phelsuma guimbeaui</i>.

    No full text
    <p>* denotes significant at P<0.05.</p><p>Subpop = subpopulation; Area = area of subpopulation in km<sup>2</sup>; A = number of individuals per subpopulation; H<sub>N</sub> = number of haplotypes; H = haplotype diversity; π = nucleotide diversity; D = Tajima's D; Fs = Fu's Fs statistic; r = raggedness index.</p

    Pattern of deforestation in Mauritius from 1773 to 1997.

    No full text
    <p>The red dots indicate the 10 subpopulations for which both microsatellite and mtDNA analyses were conducted, and the yellow dots the three subpopulations for which only mtDNA analyses were carried out. The blue stars mark subpopulations not sampled and the black region within the purple dotted line on the 1997 map shows the Black River mountains. All subpopulation locations were transposed by 1</p

    Phylogenetic relationships of mtDNA haplotypes in <i>Phelsuma guimbeaui</i>.

    No full text
    <p>The Bayesian tree was produced in MRBAYES with subpopulation identity (L1 to L13) shown at the end of each branch. In the parsimony network, the circles represent different haplotypes, with their size proportional to the number of geckos. Open circles represent predicted but missing or unsampled haplotypes.</p
    corecore