Retrospective report of antimicrobial susceptibility observed in bacterial pathogens isolated from ocular samples at Mount Sinai Hospital, 2010 to 2015

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a major threat to global public health. Thus, the surveillance of changes in antimicrobial resistance in local and global settings is a paramount necessity. While many studies have tracked antimicrobial resistance, only a small percentage surveyed ocular isolates. The purpose of this study was to report the in vitro susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated from ocular samples in New York, NY from 2010 to 2015. Methods A retrospective review of ocular isolates was conducted. All organisms were collected by 25 separate inpatient wards and outpatient clinics, and were analyzed by the clinical microbiology laboratory at Mount Sinai Hospital. Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were followed for susceptibility testing and breakpoint interpretations. Results A total of 549 bacterial organisms were isolated from 1664 cultures (33%) during the 6-year study period. Of these, 358 isolates (65.2%) underwent susceptibility testing. 182 (50.8%) isolates were Gram-positive. The most common Gram-positive bacterium was Staphylococcus aureus (62.1%). Methicillin-resistance decreased in S. aureus isolates (31.3% in 2010, 14.1% in 2015) but was without significant change (p = 0.25). When analyzing all S. aureus isolates recovered during the study period, there were significantly more methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates resistant to fluoroquinolones (p <0.0001), erythromycin (p <0.0001), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ; p <0.05). Overall, Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates showed reduced susceptibility to erythromycin, but were otherwise susceptible to the other antimicrobials tested. Haemophilus influenzae (26.1%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23.9%) were the most common Gram-negative bacteria isolated. Resistance to ampicillin and TMP/SMZ was observed in several of the H. influenzae isolates. P. aeruginosa isolates did not show high resistance overall, however, it was noted that isolates resistant to meropenem were also resistant to other antimicrobials (p < 0.01). Conclusion Overall, antimicrobial resistance was infrequent for the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria analyzed. While the MRSA isolates demonstrated increased resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes, this is expected for this pathogen. Due to the continued use of broad-spectrum oral and systemic antimicrobials to treat ocular infections, findings of this study and other surveillance studies specific to ocular isolates should be used as resources in effective decision making in the treatment of ocular disease

A safety review of proton pump inhibitors to treat acid-related digestive diseases

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have become the first choice medical treatment of acid-related disease and, as with any pharmacological agent, they have been reported to be associated with some adverse events mainly linked to their chronic use. The most important postulated harms are represented by serum electrolyte alterations, vitamin B12 and iron deficiency, gastric tumors, enteric infections, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, pneumonia, ischemic heart attacks, bone fractures, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and Alzheimer disease. Specific pathophysiological mechanisms have been identified for some of them and not for other manifestations. Areas covered: However, studies on PPIs safety have generally important limitations because of their frequent retrospective design and other methodological drawbacks, such as patients\u2019 selection and residual confounders. Expert opinion: Obviously, in the vast majority of the cases, adverse drug reactions cannot be assessed by means of randomized clinical trials due to the high costs, ethical reasons, and difficulties in performing prospective observational studies. So far, assessment of retrospective observational investigations remains the only method to evaluate adverse events with any drug in general and, although the weaknesses of these studies are evident, the awareness of the reported associations with the medications analyzed is important for physicians in order to manage adequately their individual patients