Familial cases of a submicroscopic Xp22.2 deletion : genotype-phenotype correlation in microphthalmia with linear skin defects syndrome

Purpose: Microphthalmia with linear skin defects syndrome (MLS or MIDAS, OMIM #309801) is a rare X-linked male-lethal disorder characterized by microphthalmia or other ocular anomalies and skin lesions limited to the face and neck. However, inter-and intrafamilial variability is high. Here we report a familial case of MLS. Methods: A mother and daughter with MLS underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, and extensive imaging, including anterior segment pictures, corneal topography and keratometry, autofluorescence, infrared reflectance and red free images, as well as spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The mother also underwent full-field flash electroretinography. In addition, high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization analysis was performed in both as well as in the maternal grandparents of the proband. Results: Microphthalmia and retinal abnormalities were noted in the proband and the mother, whereas only the mother presented with scars of the typical neonatal linear skin defects. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed a 185-220 kb deletion on chromosome band Xp22.2 including the entire HCCS gene. Conclusions: The identification of a deletion including HCCS led to the diagnosis of MLS in these patients. Retinal abnormalities can be part of the ocular manifestations of MLS

Belgian Endothelial Surgical Transplant of the Cornea (BEST cornea) protocol: Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of Ultra-Thin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) - A multicentric, randomised, parallel group pragmatic trial in corneal endothelial decompensation

Objectives Corneal blindness is the third most frequent cause of blindness globally. Damage to the corneal endothelium is a leading indication for corneal transplantation, which is typically performed by lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. There are two conventional surgical techniques: Ultra-Thin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). The purpose of this study is to compare both techniques. Methods and analysis The trial compares UT-DSAEK and DMEK in terms of clinical and patient reported outcomes using a pragmatic, parallel, multicentric, randomised controlled trial with 1:1 allocation with a sample size of 220 participants across 11 surgical centres. The primary outcome is the change in best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include corrected and uncorrected vision, refraction, proportion of high vision, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and VFQ25), endothelial cell counts and corneal thickness at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up appointments. Adverse events will also be compared 12 months postoperatively. Ethics and dissemination The protocol was reviewed by ethical committees of 11 participating centres with the sponsor centre issuing the final definitive approval. The results will be disseminated at clinical conferences, by patient partner groups and open access in peer-reviewed journals. Governance of the trial Both, trial management group and trial steering committee, are installed with representatives of all stakeholders involved including surgeons, corneal bankers, patients and external experts. Trial registration number NCT05436665

Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage

Most of the tissue used for penetrating keratoplasty is issued through eye banks that store the corneoscleral button either in hypothermic storage at 2–6°C or in organ culture at 31–37°C

Cornea banking en cornea transplantatie, partim 1: cornea banking

A

Corneal manifestations and in vivo confocal microscopy of Gaucher disease

Purpose: To report corneal abnormalities and confocal microscopy findings in a patient with a variant of Gaucher disease (GD). Methods: Case report with slit-lamp photography, confocal microscopy, and molecular analysis of the glucocerebrosidase gene. Results: Ophthalmic evaluation in a 57-year-old white patient demonstrated corneal opacities scattered throughout the cornea. Confocal microscopy revealed a completely distorted stromal architecture. The anterior part showed keratocytes with an abnormal morphology intermingled with minute white dots. In the posterior part, normal keratocytes were virtually absent and replaced by hyperreflective rod-like structures. Analysis of the glucocerebrosidase gene disclosed a heterozygous F216Y/L444P mutation. The patient's old records revealed that these corneal abnormalities were already present at the age of 16 years, almost 15 years before the diagnosis of GD was made. His 2 siblings known with the same disorder and mutations also showed abnormal visual acuity and increased central corneal thickness. The confocal microscopy demonstrated some subclinical abnormalities, but otherwise normal corneas. Conclusions: Our patient had an unusual mutation responsible for his GD. Although corneal opacities are virtually unknown in GD, except in the D409H homozygous cardiovascular subtype, this patient had marked corneal stromal abnormalities