Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Microwave Ablation Prior to Liver Transplantation

Introduction: Ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that limits local liver tumor progression and prolongs patients’ transplantation eligibility. Microwave ablation (MWA) utilizes higher temperatures than the standard of care, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which increases efficiency. Meta-analyses compared MWA with RFA for the treatment of HCC and showed similar efficacy and safety between these modalities. However, limited pathologic data exists determining whether explanted tumors remained viable after MWA. Methods: Our database was reviewed retrospectively for patients with HCC who underwent MWA prior to liver transplantation between 2013 and 2019. Patient demographics, etiology of disease, tumor size, procedure details, bilirubin, MELD, and Child-Pugh score were reviewed. Tumors were classified as viable or nonviable based on pathology. Imaging and clinical follow-up were available for surveillance and post-transplant. Results: 29 patients (23 males, 6 females) with 40 tumors underwent MWA. The average patient age was 60 years. The mean tumor size was 2.2 cm (range 1-3.7). Twenty-six patients were alive at follow-up. Pathological analysis showed 38 of the 40 tumors ablated to be non-viable at explant. Imaging prior to transplant reported one case with recurrent tumor at the ablation site and another case as equivocal. No cases of metastatic HCC were identified by imaging post-transplant. Discussion: Previous studies have not included this pathologic data. Determining tumor viability provides valuable information regarding whether tumors are likely to recur locally, even after transplantation. These results suggest that MWA is an effective treatment of small HCC prior to transplant with a low incidence of local tumor recurrence

US-triggered Microbubble Destruction for Augmenting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Transarterial Radioembolization: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial.

Combined US-triggered microbubble destruction and hepatocellular carcinoma radioembolization showed improved treatment response compared with radioembolization alone and no changes in vital signs or liver function. Background US contrast agents are gas-filled microbubbles (MBs) that can be locally destroyed by using external US. Among other bioeffects, US-triggered MB destruction, also known as UTMD, has been shown to sensitize solid tumors to radiation in preclinical models through localized insult to the vascular endothelial cells. Purpose: To evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of combining US-triggered MB destruction and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: In this pilot clinical trial, participants with HCC scheduled for sublobar TARE were randomized to undergo either TARE or TARE with US-triggered MB destruction 1–4 hours and approximately 1 and 2 weeks after TARE. Enrollment took place between July 2017 and February 2020. Safety of US-triggered MB destruction was evaluated by physiologic monitoring, changes in liver function tests, adverse events, and radiopharmaceutical distribution. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) on cross-sectional images, time to required next treatment, transplant rates, and overall survival. Differences across mRECIST reads were compared by using a Mann-Whitney U test, and the difference in prevalence of tumor response was evaluated by Fisher exact test, whereas differences in time to required next treatment and overall survival curves were compared by using a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Results: Safety results from 28 participants (mean age, 70 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 17 men) demonstrated no significant changes in temperature (P = .31), heart rate (P = .92), diastolic pressure (P = .31), or systolic pressure (P = .06) before and after US-triggered MB destruction. No changes in liver function tests between treatment arms were observed 1 month after TARE (P \u3e .15). Preliminary efficacy results showed a greater prevalence of tumor response (14 of 15 [93%; 95% CI: 68, 100] vs five of 10 [50%; 95% CI: 19, 81]; P = .02) in participants who underwent both US-triggered MB destruction and TARE (P = .02). Conclusion: The combination of US-triggered microbubble destruction and transarterial radioembolization is feasible with an excellent safety profile in this patient population and appears to result in improved hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response

Patterns of Acetaminophen Use at a Tertiary Care Center: Exposures Exceeding 4 Grams Daily

Unintentional hepatotoxicity due to acetaminophen use at the recommended daily dose of up to four grams daily has increasingly been recognized as a significant problem. The phrase therapeutic misadventure has been coined in the literature, in reference to biochemical evidence of hepatocellular injury associated with acetaminophen use at recommended doses. Previous studies have documented a 25% to 40% incidence of two- to three-fold alanie aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, in healty volunteers administered one gram of acetaminophen every six hours. The recognition of this problem is reflected in part by recent changes in FDA recommendations, including more stringent controls on the amount of acetaminophen which may be contained per tablet in combination formulations together with narcotics. Furthermore, an advisory panel to the FDA recommended that the currently widely accepted maximum daily dose of up to four grams daily may be too high

Clinical Vignette: A Case of Successful Surgical Decortication for Empyema with Trapped Lung, in A Patient with Decompensated Cirrhosis

Introduction Hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is a difficult-to-control complication of cirrhosis. Chest tube (CT) drainage is an option for management of HH, but is associated with a high rate of secondary infection and other complications

Treatment of Duodenal Variceal Hemorrhage with Endoscopic Band Ligation

Introduction • Duodenal varices (DV) are a rare but potentially serious complication of portal hypertension and carry a high risk of massive gastrointestinal bleeding. • This is a report of successful treatment of a massive DV hemorrhage with endoscopic band ligation