Stability in eosinophil categorisation during subsequent severe exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND: The blood eosinophil count has been shown to be a promising biomarker for establishing personalised treatment strategies to reduce corticosteroid use, either inhaled or systemic, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Eosinophil levels seem relatively stable over time in stable state, but little is known whether this is also true in subsequent severe acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the stability in eosinophil categorisation between two subsequent severe AECOPDs employing frequently used cut-off levels. METHODS: During two subsequent severe AECOPDs, blood eosinophil counts were determined at admission to the hospital in 237 patients in the Cohort of Mortality and Inflammation in COPD Study. The following four cut-off levels were analysed: absolute counts of eosinophils ≥0.2×10⁹/L (200 cells/µL) and ≥0.3×10⁹/L (300 cells/µL) and relative eosinophil percentage of ≥2% and ≥3% of total leucocyte count. Categorisations were considered stable if during the second AECOPD their blood eosinophil status led to the same classification: eosinophilic or not. RESULTS: Depending on the used cut-off, the overall stability in eosinophil categorisation varied between 70% and 85% during two subsequent AECOPDs. From patients who were eosinophilic at the first AECOPD, 34%–45% remained eosinophilic at the subsequent AECOPD, while 9%–21% of patients being non-eosinophilic at the first AECOPD became eosinophilic at the subsequent AECOPD. CONCLUSIONS: The eosinophil variability leads to category changes in subsequent AECOPDs, which limits the eosinophil categorisation stability. Therefore, measurement of eosinophils at each new exacerbation seems warranted

Predicting Mortality in COPD with Validated and Sensitive Biomarkers; Fibrinogen and Mid-Range-Proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM)

Although fibrinogen is a FDA qualified prognostic biomarker in COPD, it still lacks sufficient resolution to be clinically useful. Next to replication of findings in different cohorts also the combination with other validated biomarkers should be investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to confirm in a large well-defined population of COPD patients whether fibrinogen can predict mortality and whether a combination with the biomarker MR-proADM can increase prognostic accuracy. From the COMIC cohort study we included COPD patients with a blood sample obtained in stable state (n = 640) and/or at hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of COPD (n = 262). Risk of death during 3 years of follow up for the separate and combined biomarker models was analyzed with Cox regression. Furthermore, logistic regression models for death after one year were constructed. When both fibrinogen and MR-proADM were included in the survival model, a doubling in fibrinogen and MR-proADM levels gave a 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.7) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-3.0) fold increased risk of dying, respectively. The prediction model for death after 1 year improved significantly when MR-proADM was added to the model with fibrinogen (AUC increased from 0.78 to 0.83; p = 0.02). However, the combined model was not significantly more adequate than the model with solely MR-proADM (AUC 0.83 vs 0.82; p = 0.34). The study suggests that MR-proADM is more promising than fibrinogen in prediciting mortality. Adding fibrinogen to a model containing MR-proADM does not significantly increase the predictive capacity of the model

Endosonography With or Without Confirmatory Mediastinoscopy for Resectable Lung Cancer:A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE:Resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high probability of mediastinal nodal involvement requires mediastinal staging by endosonography and, in the absence of nodal metastases, confirmatory mediastinoscopy according to current guidelines. However, randomized data regarding immediate lung tumor resection after systematic endosonography versus additional confirmatory mediastinoscopy before resection are lacking.METHODS:Patients with (suspected) resectable NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging after negative systematic endosonography were randomly assigned to immediate lung tumor resection or confirmatory mediastinoscopy followed by tumor resection. The primary outcome in this noninferiority trial (noninferiority margin of 8% that previously showed to not compromise survival, Pnoninferior &lt;.0250) was the presence of unforeseen N2 disease after tumor resection with lymph node dissection. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major morbidity and mortality.RESULTS:Between July 17, 2017, and October 5, 2020, 360 patients were randomly assigned, 178 to immediate lung tumor resection (seven dropouts) and 182 to confirmatory mediastinoscopy first (seven dropouts before and six after mediastinoscopy). Mediastinoscopy detected metastases in 8.0% (14/175; 95% CI, 4.8 to 13.0) of patients. Unforeseen N2 rate after immediate resection (8.8%) was noninferior compared with mediastinoscopy first (7.7%) in both intention-to-treat (Δ, 1.03%; UL 95% CIΔ, 7.2%; Pnoninferior =.0144) and per-protocol analyses (Δ, 0.83%; UL 95% CIΔ, 7.3%; Pnoninferior =.0157). Major morbidity and 30-day mortality was 12.9% after immediate resection versus 15.4% after mediastinoscopy first (P =.4940).CONCLUSION:On the basis of our chosen noninferiority margin in the rate of unforeseen N2, confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative systematic endosonography can be omitted in patients with resectable NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging.</p

Statins and morbidity and mortality in COPD in the COMIC study: a prospective COPD cohort study

BACKGROUND: Both chronic inflammation and cardiovascular comorbidity play an important role in the morbidity and mortality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Statins could be a potential adjunct therapy. The additional effects of statins in COPD are, however, still under discussion. The aim of this study is to further investigate the association of statin use with clinical outcomes in a well-described COPD cohort. METHODS: 795 patients of the Cohort of Mortality and Inflammation in COPD (COMIC) study were divided into statin users or not. Statin use was defined as having a statin for at least 90 consecutive days after inclusion. Outcome parameters were 3-year survival, based on all-cause mortality, time until first hospitalisation for an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and time until first community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A sensitivity analysis was performed without patients who started a statin 3 months or more after inclusion to exclude immortal time bias. RESULTS: Statin use resulted in a better overall survival (corrected HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.96) in multivariate analysis), but in the sensitivity analysis this association disappeared. Statin use was not associated with time until first hospitalisation for an AECOPD (cHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.22) or time until first CAP (cHR 1.1, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: In the COMIC study, statin use is not associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, time until first hospitalisation for an AECOPD or time until first CAP in patients with COPD

Combining exhaled-breath analysis data with clinical parameters to improve the diagnosis of lung cancer

Introduction: Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality. Exhaled-breath analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC’s), reflecting pathological processes, might detect lung cancer at an early stage, possibly leading to improved outcomes. Combining breath patterns with clinical parameters may improve the accuracy to diagnose lung cancer. Methods: In a multi-center study 144 subjects diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 146 healthy subjects breathed into the Aeonose™ (The eNose Company, Zutphen, Netherlands). The diagnostic accuracy, presented as Area under the Curve (AUC) of the Aeonose™ sec was compared with the diagnostic accuracy when combined with clinical parameters in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Confirmed NSCLC patients (67.1 (9.0) years; 57.6% male) were compared with controls without NSCLC (62.1 (7.1) years; 40.4% male). The AUC of the absolute Aeonose™ value obtained by a trained neural network was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.82). Adding age, number of pack years, and presence of COPD to this absolute value of the Aeonose™ from the neural network resulted in an improved performance with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90). By choosing an appropriate threshold value in the ROC-diagram of the multivariate model, we observed a sensitivity of 95.7%, a specificity of 59.7%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 69.5% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion: Adding readily available clinical information to the absolute obtained value of exhaled-breath analysis with the Aeonose™ improves the diagnostic accuracy to detect the presence or absence of lung cancer

Stable-State Midrange Proadrenomedullin Is Associated With Severe Exacerbations in COPD

Background: Elevated levels of midrange proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) are associated with worse outcome in different diseases, including COPD. The association of stable-state MR-proADM with severe acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) requiring hospitalization, or with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with COPD, has not been studied yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of stable-state MR-proADM with severe AECOPD and CAP in patients with COPD. Methods: This study pooled data of 1,285 patients from the Cohort of Mortality and Inflammation in COPD (COMIC) and PRedicting Outcome using systemic Markers In Severe Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PROMISE-COPD) cohort studies. Time until first severe AECOPD was compared between patients with high (≥ 0.87 nmol/L) or low (< 0.87 nmol/L) levels of plasma MR-proADM in stable state as previously defined. For time until first CAP, only COMIC data (n = 795) were available. Results: Patients with COPD with high-level stable-state MR-proADM have a significantly higher risk for severe AECOPD compared with those with low-level MR-proADM with a corrected hazard ratio (HR) of 1.30 (95% CI, 1.01-1.68). Patients with high-level stable-state MR-proADM had a significantly higher risk for CAP compared with patients with COPD with low-level MR-proADM in univariate analysis (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.24-3.01), but after correction for age, lung function, and previous AECOPD, the association was no longer significant (corrected HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.68-1.80). Conclusions: Stable-state high-level MR-proADM in patients with COPD is associated with severe AECOPD but not with CAP