Aneurysmal degeneration of the superficial femoral artery after remote endarterectomy

Superficial femoral artery reocclusion is the most common complication of remote endarterectomy with the Mollring device. We present the first reported case of a male patient who developed aneurysmal degeneration of the superficial femoral artery after a previous left common femoral endarterectomy and superficial femoral remote endarterectomy with popliteal stenting. He underwent thrombolysis with subsequent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty after developing acute left lower extremity ischemia. At 12-month follow-up, he was free of claudication symptoms. This case illustrates the need for close surveillance and discusses possible treatment options for patients with this rare complication

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing endovascular infrainguinal interventions with single-vessel peroneal artery runoff

ObjectivesRecent reports have shown promising early results after endovascular revascularization (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]/stent) of patients with peroneal artery-only runoff (PAOR), although the long-term durability is unclear. This study evaluated long-term primary patency and limb salvage of PTA/stent in patients with single-vessel runoff and critical limb ischemia to determine if the peroneal artery yields inferior results.MethodsFrom January 2002 to December 2007, 1075 infrainguinal PTA/stent procedures were performed in 920 patients. The study cohort comprised 201 limbs in 187 patients with single-vessel runoff and critical limb ischemia. End points included primary patency, assisted patency, limb salvage, and survival. Long-term outcomes were determined by Kaplan-Meier life-table and multivariate Cox regression analyses.ResultsThere were 104 PAOR and 97 limbs with single-vessel posterior or anterior tibial artery runoff (non-PAOR). Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 0-75 months). PAOR patients tended to be older (77.36 ± 0.92 vs 72.65 ± 1.18 years, P = .002) and were more likely to be taking clopidogrel at presentation (88% vs 76%; P = .04). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year primary patency (26% ± 6.8% vs 30% ± 7.6%; P = .79), assisted patency (75% ± 8.8% vs 81% ± 7.0%; P = .77), limb salvage (74% ± 8.0% vs 75% ± 7.1%; P = .47), and survival (38% ± 7.7% vs 47% ± 6.6%; P = .99) between the PAOR and the non-PAOR groups, respectively. On Cox regression multivariate analysis, total occlusions predicted decreased assisted patency (hazard ratio, 2.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-7.41; P = .02), whereas younger age predicted poor limb salvage (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P = .04). PAOR was not an independent predictor of any outcome on multivariate analysis.ConclusionsPatients with PAOR have similar long-term outcomes to patients with non-PAOR. Thus, infrainguinal endovascular revascularization can be considered a first-line therapy for patients with PAOR and critical limb ischemia

Implementation of a patient-centered remote wound monitoring system for management of diabetic foot ulcers

BackgroundRegular clinical assessment is critical to optimize lower extremity wound healing. However, family and work obligations, socioeconomic, transportation, and time barriers often limit patient follow-up. We assessed the feasibility of a novel, patient-centered, remote wound management system (Healthy.io Minuteful for Wound Digital Management System) for the surveillance of lower extremity wounds.MethodsWe enrolled 25 patients from our outpatient multidisciplinary limb preservation clinic with a diabetic foot ulcer, who had undergone revascularization and podiatric interventions prior to enrollment. Patients and their caregivers were instructed on how to use the digital management system and asked to perform one at-home wound scan per week for a total of 8 weeks using a smartphone application. We collected prospective data on patient engagement, smartphone app useability, and patient satisfaction.ResultsTwenty-five patients (mean age 65.5 ± 13.7 years, 60.0% male, 52.0% Black) were enrolled over 3 months. Mean baseline wound area was 18.0 ± 15.2 cm2, 24.0% of patients were recovering from osteomyelitis, and post-surgical WiFi stage was 1 in 24.0%, 2 in 40.0%, 3 in 28.0%, and 4 in 8.00% of patients. We provided a smartphone to 28.0% of patients who did not have access to one that was compatible with the technology. Wound scans were obtained by patients (40.0%) and caregivers (60.0%). Overall, 179 wound scans were submitted through the app. The mean number of wound scans acquired per patient was 0.72 ± 0.63 per week, for a total mean of 5.80 ± 5.30 scans over the course of 8 weeks. Use of the digital wound management system triggered an early change in wound management for 36.0% of patients. Patient satisfaction was high; 94.0% of patients reported the system was useful.ConclusionThe Healthy.io Minuteful for Wound Digital Management System is a feasible means of remote wound monitoring for use by patients and/or their caregivers

Endovascular versus \u27\u27Fast-Track\u27\u27 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Recent studies have shown that endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has decreased costs, as well as decreased intensive care unit and total hospital length of stays when compared to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using a retroperitoneal exposure. The authors hypothesized that the fast-track AAA repair, which combines a retroperitoneal exposure with a patient care pathway that includes a gastric promotility agent and patient-controlled analgesia, would have no differences when compared to EVAR. Records of 58 patients who underwent AAA repair between April 14, 2000, and July 12, 2002, were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic information, length of stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, mortality, and costs were evaluated. Fifty-eight AAA repairs were performed with the EVAR (n=28) and fast-track (n=30) techniques. The EVAR group was slightly older (72 vs 68 years, p=0.04), had slightly smaller average aneurysm size (5.5 +/-0.13 vs 6.1 +/-0.17 cm, p=0.008), and had more patients designated American Society of Anesthesia class 4 (p\u3c0.0001). Both groups were predominantly male. Otherwise there were no statistically significant differences in risk factors. Patients who underwent fast-track repair tended to have a longer operation (216 +/-7.4 vs 158 +/-6.8 minutes, p\u3c0.0001), with a greater volume of blood (1.8 +/-0.29 vs 0.32 +/-0.24 units, p=0.0005), colloid (565 +/-89 vs 32 +/-22 cc, p\u3c0.0001), and crystalloid transfusions (4,625 +/-252 vs 2,627 +/-170 cc, p\u3c0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of intraoperative or postoperative complications between the 2 groups. EVAR patients resumed a regular diet earlier (0.21 +/-0.08 vs 1.8 +/-0.11 days, p\u3c0.0001). Intensive care unit stay was shorter for EVAR (0.50 +/-0.10 vs 0.87 +/-0.10 days, p=0.01), but floor (2.1 +/-0.23 vs 2.6 +/-0.21 days, p=0.17), and total hospital lengths of stay (2.8 +/-0.32 vs 3.4 +/-0.18 days, p=0.07) were similar between the 2 groups. Total hospital cost was lower in the fast-track (10,205 dollars +/-736 dollars vs 20,640 dollars +/- 1,206 dollars, p\u3c0.0001) leading to greater overall hospital earnings (6,141 dollars +/- 1,280 dollars vs 107 dollars +/- 1,940 dollars, p=0.01). Fast-track AAA repair is a viable alternative for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Compared to endovascular repair, the fast-track method had increased transfusions of blood and intravenous fluids and increased operating room times, but equivalent lengths of floor and total hospital stay and increased total hospital earnings

Racial disparity in early graft failure after infrainguinal bypass

Background: Racial disparities have been shown to be associated with increasing health-care costs. We sought to identify racial disparities in 30-d graft failure rates after infrainguinal bypass in an effort to define targets for improved health care among minorities. Methods: The 2005-2011 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients with peripheral arterial disease who underwent infrainguinal bypass as their primary procedure. A bivariate analysis was done to assess pre and intraoperative risk factors across race (whites, blacks, and Hispanics). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the independent association of race with 30-d graft failure. Results: Of a total of 16,276 patients, 12,536 (77.0%) were whites, 2940 (18.1%) blacks, and 800 (4.9%) Hispanics. Black patients were more likely to be younger, female, current smokers, and on dialysis (P\u3c0.001, all). In addition, whites were less likely to present with critical limb ischemia compared with blacks and Hispanics (44.2 versus 55.4 versus 52.8%, respectively; P\u3c0.001). Similarly, fewer whites underwent femoral-tibial (31.4 vs. 34.7 vs. 38.6% respectively) or popliteal-tibial level bypasses (8.9 versus 13.4 versus 16.1%, respectively) than blacks and Hispanics (P\u3c0.001, all). There was no difference in the use of autogenous conduit across the groups (P=0.266). Proportionally more blacks than whites developed early graft failure (6.7 versus 4.5%; P\u3c0.001) but there was no difference comparing Hispanics to whites (6.0 versus 4.5%; P=0.057). On multivariable analysis, black race remained independently associated with early graft failure (adjusted odds ratio=1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.51; P=0.011). Conclusions: More blacks and Hispanics present with critical limb ischemia, requiring distal revascularization. Even when controlling for anatomic differences and degree of peripheral arterial disease, black race remained independently associated with early graft failure after infrainguinal bypass. These results identify a target for improved outcome