1 research outputs found
ΠΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π°
The article discusses up-to-date methodological issues of relativity in legal
science. Relativity considered as the relativity of knowledge about an object characterises
modern Post-Classical philosophy and science. Radical relativity as a pluralism in the
sphere of values causes the well-founded concern of many scientists. The authors of
the article propose their own vision of the content of relativity as a methodological
principle of the Post-Classical legal science. The Post-Classical methodology used by the
authors suggests criticising classical jurisprudence and dialogism (the interdependence of
opposing points) as a positive programme. Relativity in law, according to the authors, is
the pre-dependence of law by the social and cultural context, the interdependence of law
and other social phenomena. Law does not exist βin its pure formβ, but always appears
as a side or aspect of the psyche, culture, economy and politics. Such an approach is
not identical to arbitrariness, since law, in conjunction with other social phenomena, is
intended to ensure the integrity of society. The proposed approach provides a deeper
picture of a multidimensional legal reality and represents a version of a new Post-Classical
methodology that is adequate to a contemporary societyΠ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π² ΡΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ΅. Π Π΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΡ.
Π Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ
ΡΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ
Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ
(Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ²) ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ. Π Π΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ Π² ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅, ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², β ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π°
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΌ, Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡΠ°Π²ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ Β«Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Β», Π° Π²ΡΠ΅Π³Π΄Π° Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°
ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½
ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»Ρ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎ Π²ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π²Π°Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ°. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅
Π³Π»ΡΠ±ΠΎΠΊΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²