Changes in Physical Components after Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma of Stomach and Esophagogastric Junction

Objective: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary approach that aims to optimize perioperative management, promote postoperative recovery, reduce postoperative complications, and improve long-term survival. The current study aimed to evaluate and compare the postoperative physical activity after gastrectomy between patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal surgery according to ERAS and those who underwent surgery based on the conventional care (CC) protocol. Materials and Methods: This prospective and retrospective review enrolled 60 patients (n = 31, ERAS group; n = 29, CC protocol group) diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagogastric junction who underwent curative surgical resection. Physical outcomes, including body weight, body mass index, body fat percentage, basal metabolic rate, muscle mass, gait speed, and handgrip strength at the preoperative and immediate postoperative periods and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, were comparedbetween the ERAS and CC protocol groups. Results: One month after surgery, the ERAS group had a lower percentage of body weight loss than the CC protocol group. There was no significant difference in terms of muscle mass loss between the two groups. The hand grip strength of the ERAS group increased after surgery. Further, at 1 month postoperatively, the gait speed of patients who underwent total gastrectomy in the ERAS group was significantly higher than that of patients in the CC protocol group. Conclusion: ERAS for gastrectomy was associated with a lower percentage of weight loss and a trend toward physical activity enhancement in the early postoperative period

Aerosol protection using modified N95 respirator during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Background/Aims The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has affected the worldwide practice of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Here we designed a modified N95 respirator with a channel for endoscope insertion and evaluated its efficacy in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods Thirty patients scheduled for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized into the modified N95 (n=15) or control (n=15) group. The mask was placed on the patient after anesthesia administration and particles were counted every minute before (baseline) and during the procedure by a TSI AeroTrak particle counter (9306-04; TSI Inc.) and categorized by size (0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 10 µm). Differences in particle counts between time points were recorded. Results During the procedure, the modified N95 group displayed significantly smaller overall particle sizes than the control group (median [interquartile range], 231 [54–385] vs. 579 [213–1,379]×103/m3; p=0.056). However, the intervention group had a significant decrease in 0.3-µm particles (68 [–25–185] vs. 242 [72–588]×103/m3; p=0.045). No adverse events occurred in either group. The device did not cause any inconvenience to the endoscopists or patients. Conclusions This modified N95 respirator reduced the number of particles, especially 0.3-µm particles, generated during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy