Biopsy proven acute interstitial nephritis after treatment with moxifloxacin

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is an important cause of reversible acute kidney injury. At least 70% of AIN is caused by various drugs, mainly penicillines and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Quinolones are only rarely known to cause AIN and so far cases have been mainly described with older fluoroquinolones.</p> <p>Case Presentation</p> <p>Here we describe a case of biopsy proven interstitial nephritis after moxifloxacin treatment. The patient presented with fever, rigors and dialysis dependent acute kidney injury, just a few days after treatment of a respiratory tract infection with moxifloxacin. The renal biopsy revealed dense infiltrates mainly composed of eosinophils and severe interstitial edema. A course of oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) was commenced and rapidly tapered to zero within three weeks. The renal function improved, and the patient was discharged with a creatinine of 107 μmol/l.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This case illustrates that pharmacovigilance is important to early detect rare side effects, such as AIN, even in drugs with a favourable risk/benefit ratio such as moxifloxacin.</p

Minimal change nephrotic syndrome in an 82 year old patient following a tetanus-diphteria-poliomyelitis-vaccination

Abstract Background The most common cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children and younger adults is the minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS). In the elderly MCNS is relatively uncommon. Over the last decade some reports suggest a rare but possible association with the administration of various vaccines. Case presentation A 82-year old Caucasian female presented with pronounced nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria of 7.1 g/d, hypoproteinemia of 47 g/l). About six weeks prior to admission, she had received a combination vaccination for tetanus, diphtheria and poliomyelitis as a booster-vaccination from her general practitioner. The renal biopsy revealed typical minimal change lesions. She responded well to the initiated steroid treatment. As through physical examination as well as extensive laboratory and imaging studies did neither find any evidence for malignancies nor infections we suggest that the minimal change nephrotic syndrome in this patient might be related to the activation of the immune system triggered by the vaccination. Conclusion Our case as well as previous anecdotal reports suggests that vaccination and the resulting stimulations of the immune system might cause MCNS and other severe immune-reactions. Increased awareness in that regard might help to expand the database of those cases.</p

The Randomized Olmesartan and Diabetes Microalbuminuria Prevention (ROADMAP) Observational Follow-Up Study:Benefits of RAS Blockade With Olmesartan Treatment Are Sustained After Study Discontinuation

BACKGROUND: The Randomized Olmesartan and Diabetes Microalbuminuria Prevention (ROADMAP) study showed that 40 mg Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) versus placebo delayed microalbuminuria onset in patients with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria. METHODS AND RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred and fifty‐eight ROADMAP patients (placebo arm: 877; OM arm: 881) participated in the observational follow up (OFU) with an average of 3.3 years. They received standard medical care and micro‐ and macrovascular events were documented. During observational follow‐up 62.9% and 60.1% in the former OM and placebo group, respectively, received treatment with a RAS blocking agent. During the OFU period the systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased to mean values of 135 mm Hg in both groups. Patients who had developed microalbuminuria during ROADMAP had a higher incidence of cardio‐ and cerebrovascular events (OR 1.77, CI 1.03 to 3.03, P=0.039) during the OFU period compared with patients in whom this was not the case. Diabetic retinopathy was significantly reduced in the former OM group (8 [0.9%] versus 23 [2.6%], OR: 0.34, CI 0.15 to 0.78, P=0.011) and the rate of microalbuminuria was numerically reduced. Congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization (3 [0.3%] versus 12 [1.4%], OR: 0.23, CI 0.06 to 0.85, P=0.027) was reduced and there was a trend of reduced cardio‐/cerebrovascular events (OM versus Pb: 73 [8.3%] versus 86 [9.8%] patients). Seven (0.8%) deaths (including 2 CV events) were reported in former placebo patients versus 3 (0.3%) (non‐CV events) in former OM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Development of microalbuminuria is a valid marker for future CV events. RAS blockade with Olmesartan might cause sustained reduction (legacy effect) of micro‐ and macrovascular events

Influence of pre-treatment blood pressure levels on antihypertensive drug benefits in diabetics: the roadmap experience

Purpose: Most guidelines for treatment of hypertension in the setting of diabetes recommend a blood pressure (BP) target of 160/100 from 9 to 2%[[mean BP change −31 (15.7)/ −14 (9.8) mmHg]] and of 140–159/90–99 mmHg from 32 to 11% [[mean BP change −16(12.7)/ −8.9 (8.7) mmHg]], with corresponding increases in the prevalence of patients with baseline BP levels of 120–139/80–99 from 48 to 65% [[mean BP change −4.1 (10.6)/ −3.1 (7.8) mmHg]]and of <120/80 from 11 to 22% [[mean BP change +5.9 (11.8)/+2.5 (8.6) mmHg]]. These effects did not change significantly thereafter and were maintained throughout follow-up. Conclusion: Blood pressure control is feasible in patients with diabetes without nephropathy, independent of baseline BP values. Asymmetric BP-lowering in the first year after starting therapy represents a true antihypertensive effect with sustainable shifts in BP severity

Effect of on outcome after transplantation of marginal donor kidneys

Introduction Predicting outcome after transplantation of marginal kidneys is a challenging task. Donor creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are integral components of the respective risk scores. However, there is uncertainty on which of their values obtained successively during procurement is the most suitable. Material and methods This is a retrospective study of 221 adult brain death donors with marginal kidneys, transplanted in 223 recipients. We applied logistic regression analysis to investigate the association between initial (at hospital admission), nadir (lowest), zenith (highest) and terminal (at recovery) donor eGFR with primary non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), 3- and 12-month graft function and 1- and 3-year patient- and death-censored graft survival. Results In the multivariate analysis, admission, terminal, and the lowest donor eGFR could most accurately predict DGF. The respective ORs [95% CI] were: 0.875 [0.771-0.993], 0.818 [95% CI: 0.726-0.922] and 0.793 [0.689-0.900]. Although not being significant for DGF (OR 0.931 [95% CI: 0.817-1.106]), the highest eGFR was the best predictor of 3-month graft function (adjusted b coefficient 1.161 [95% CI: 0.355-1.968]). Analysis of primary nonfunction showed that determination of initial and the highest eGFR proved to be the best predictors. The respective ORs [95% CI] were: 0.804 [0.667-0.968] and 0.750 [0.611-0.919]. There were no differences in the risk associations of each of the four eGFR recordings with patient- and graft survival. Conclusion The various eGFR recordings determined during the procurement process of marginal donors can predict PNF, DGF and 3- and 12-month graft function. Regarding short-term patient- and graft survival, there appears to be impacted by recipient factors rather than donor kidney function

Short-term outcomes after transplantation of deceased donor kidneys with acute kidney injury: a retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort of marginal donor kidneys with post-explantation biopsies

Background Deceased donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) are often discarded because of concerns about inferior transplant outcomes. A means of grading the quality of such kidneys is the performance of procurement biopsies. Methods This is a retrospective study of 221 brain death donors with marginal kidneys transplanted in 223 recipients in Germany. Marginal kidneys were defined as kidneys with procurement biopsies done exceptionally to assess suitability for transplantation in otherwise potentially discarded organs. The impact of deceased donor AKI on patient survival and death-censored graft survival at 1, 3 and 5 years and graft function at 1 and 3 years after transplantation was investigated. Results Recipients of kidneys with stage 3 AKI had a greater incidence of delayed graft function [DGF; ORStage 1: 1.435 (95% CI 0.438-0.702), ORStage 2: 2.463 (95% CI 0.656-9.245), ORStage 3: 4.784 (95% CI 1.421-16.101)] but a similar graft and patient survival compared to recipients of donors without AKI and with AKI stage 1 and 2 as well. The coexistence of recipient DGF and donor AKI was associated with the lowest graft survival and function rates. Conclusion The transplantation of deceased donor marginal kidneys with AKI confers a higher risk for DGF but is associated with acceptable graft and patient outcomes, which do not differ in comparison with marginal donor kidneys without AKI. Graft prognosis is especially poor if donor AKI and recipient DGF concur. Donor AKI was a risk factor independent of the histological lesions of procurement biopsies