Identification of alkyl guaiacyl dehydroabietates as novel markers of wood tar from Pinaceae in archaeological samples

Resinous material from conifers from the Pinaceae family is frequently found in an archaeological context. The material was used, notably, as waterproofing agent, as adhesive or for the caulking of boats. Two main types of material can be distinguished: resin, the exudate of conifer trees, and wood tar obtained by dry distillation of wood. Molecular investigation of such material aims, notably, at developing new molecular tools for the determination of the biological and geographical origin or of the manufacturing techniques, and for the discrimination between resin and wood tar. In this context, we report the identification by synthesis of alkyl guaiacyl dehydroabietates, which occur in a series of recent and archaeological conifer wood tar samples from shipwrecks and Gallo-Roman tar preparation sites. They most likely result from the reaction of dehydroabietic acid and alkyl guaiacols, the latter being typical wood pyrolysis products formed during the preparation of wood tar. Alkyl guaiacyl dehydroabietates are therefore proposed to be specific molecular markers for conifer wood tar, allowing a clear molecular distinction between this material and resin to be made. They are also more resistant to the alteration undergone by archaeological samples than other compounds previously proposed as markers of conifer wood tar such as anhydrosugars or alkyl guaiacols

Anaerobic Cometabolic Conversion of Benzothiophene by a Sulfate-Reducing Enrichment Culture and in a Tar-Oil-Contaminated Aquifer

Anaerobic cometabolic conversion of benzothiophene was studied with a sulfate-reducing enrichment culture growing with naphthalene as the sole source of carbon and energy. The sulfate-reducing bacteria were not able to grow with benzothiophene as the primary substrate. Metabolite analysis was performed with culture supernatants obtained by cometabolization experiments and revealed the formation of three isomeric carboxybenzothiophenes. Two isomers were identified as 2-carboxybenzothiophene and 5-carboxybenzothiophene. In some experiments, further reduced dihydrocarboxybenzothiophene was identified. No other products of benzothiophene degradation could be determined. In isotope-labeling experiments with a [(13)C]bicarbonate-buffered culture medium, carboxybenzothiophenes which were significantly enriched in the (13)C content of the carboxyl group were formed, indicating the addition of a C(1) unit from bicarbonate to benzothiophene as the initial activation reaction. This finding was consistent with the results of earlier studies on anaerobic naphthalene degradation with the same culture, and we therefore propose that benzothiophene was cometabolically converted by the same enzyme system. Groundwater analyses of the tar-oil-contaminated aquifer from which the naphthalene-degrading enrichment culture was isolated exhibited the same carboxybenzothiophene isomers as the culture supernatants. In addition, the benzothiophene degradation products, in particular, dihydrocarboxybenzothiophene, were significantly enriched in the contaminated groundwater to concentrations almost the same as those of the parent compound, benzothiophene. The identification of identical metabolites of benzothiophene conversion in the sulfate-reducing enrichment culture and in the contaminated aquifer indicated that the same enzymatic reactions were responsible for the conversion of benzothiophene in situ

Making sense of residues on flaked stone artefacts: learning from blind tests

Residue analysis has become a frequently applied method for identifying prehistoric stone tool use. Residues adhering to the stone tool with varying frequencies are interpreted as being the result of an intentional contact with the worked material during use. Yet, other processes during the life cycle of a stone tool or after deposition may leave residues and these residues may potentially lead to misinterpretations. We present a blind test that was designed to examine this issue. Results confirm that production, retouch, prehension, hafting, various incidental contacts during use and deposition may lead to residue depositions that significantly affect the accurateness of identifications of tool-use. All currently applied residue approaches are concerned. We therefore argue for a closer interaction with independent wear studies and a step-wise procedure in which a low magnification of wear traces is used as a first step for selecting potentially used flakes in archaeological contexts. In addition, residue concentrations on a tool's edge should be sufficiently dense before linking them with use