Abstract Number ‐ 148: Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting On Acute Stroke Patients With Carotid Occlusion: Benefit Or Harm?

Introduction Almost one out of four patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion also have ipsilateral internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO). The interventions for acute stroke due to extracranial ICAO with or without intracranial occlusions are still a challenge. Case series reported early revascularization reduced stroke recurrence and improved outcomes. The benefits of this intervention on hyperacute ischemic strokes (within 6 hours) were much less known. We reported here two hyperacute stroke patients who emergent CAS on ICAO. Methods Electronic medical charts were reviewed, assessing intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in two hyperacute stroke patients resulting from emergent carotid artery stenting (CAS) on the occluded internal carotid artery (ICA). Results Case description:The first patient was a 60‐year‐old male who had acute right hemiparesis, aphasia, and left gaze deviation with NIHSS12. The last known normal was five hours ago. Head and neck CT angiography (CTA) showed left anterior M2 branch artery occlusion and left ICAO. Head CT perfusion (CTP) showed a small core infarct with a large perfusion mismatch. Emergent CAS was performed without distal embolic protection (DEP) and followed by distal mechanical thrombectomy (MT). TICI 2B recanalization was achieved. After CAS, aspirin and clopidogrel were administrated. He had a large left MCA and PCA stroke from fetal PCA. A few days later, the patient developed large intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). He expired shortly. The second was a 52‐year‐old male had acute right facial droop, aphasia, dysarthria, and decreased consciousness (NIHSS 8). CTA showed left ICAO but patent intracranial arteries. CT perfusion showed a large mismatch without core infarction. He received intravenous tPA and had emergent CAS with a DEP. Aspirin 600 mg was administrated afterward. A few hours later, he had worsened weakness. Head CT showed left IPH, IVH, and subarachnoid hemorrhages with cerebral edema, and midline shift. He was medically managed for a prolonged stay and was discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Conclusions We presented two consecutive cases of emergent revascularization of ICAO in hyperacute stroke carried a high risk of ICH with poor outcome. Our online database search found that only a few case series of emergent CAS on ICAO were reported. Overall, emergent CAS carried about 20% risk of ICH and high mortality. Other series reported angioplasty on stenotic or occluded cervical ICA lesions with MT on distal occlusions had less hemorrhagic risk because there was no need fordual antiplatelet treatment. Most emergent CAS cases were performed on tandem occlusions for faster direct access and better efficacy of distal recanalization. A futurestudy comparing hemorrhagic risk betweenemergent CAS versus angioplasty of ICAO in patients with tandem occlusions can help to establish a standard MT protocol. For isolated ICAO with patent intracranial arteries from good collaterals, CTP may not be a good guidance tool for decision‐making of emergent CAS as it can falsely show mismatch from existing collaterals due to occlusion. A randomized clinical trial of comparison of medical management versus emergent CAS on those patients is warranted