[Decision process in oncology: the importance of multidisciplinary meeting]

International audienceMultidisciplinary meeting (MDM) in oncology has been institutionalised in France by the Cancer Plan. This study aims to determine the place of MDM in the decision process. From November 2004 to July 2005, we observed 29 meetings at the Tours Hospital and 324 case presentations, 80 in orthopaedics, 151 in gastroenterology and 93 in chest medicine. Forty physicians attending the meetings answered a questionnaire exploring their opinions on MDM and the collegial decision. We found that MDM is mostly the place for technical discussions and that patients' wishes are rarely addressed. The different medical specialities are well represented but we observed that only physicians attend MDM. Decisions for straightforward cases are rapidly validated. For more complex clinical situations (25 to 40% of case presentations), the multidisciplinary approach allows to adapt guidelines or to choose alternative treatments. All the physicians interviewed express that MDM legitimates the medical decision. It occurs that they disagree with the RCP decision. We discuss how MDM impacts on the medical decision as well as the shift from the individual decision to the collective one, particularly in term of responsibility

[Multidisciplinary meetings in oncology do not impact the physician-patient relationship].

International audienceCONTEXT: The setting of multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) by the French Cancer Plan has introduced new decisional elements in the patient-physician relationship in oncology. METHODS: To assess the potential impact of MDM on this relationship, a study was conducted at the Tours Hospital: 145 questionnaires were collected from patients whose files have been discussed in MDM, 40 questionnaires were collected from physicians attending these meetings and an analysis of 324 files was performed. RESULTS: Patients recognize the decisional process of MDM as reassuring for 80% of them. However, a majority (73%) expressed that the most important for them is the relationship with the referring physician, almost all (96%) having a total or great confidence in him. The results emphasize that trust appears to be related to the quality of communication, open dialogue and the competence of the doctor in particular in the choice of treatment. A review of files shows that in 91% of cases, the opinion of the RCP is applied and that, in 69% of cases, the referring doctor delivers the information to the patient after MDM. From the physicians' perspective, 33/40 report that the MDM do not alter their relationship with the patient. We note that 35/40 express that the consultation after MDM facilitates the presentation of the decision and 37/40 that the decision is always or often applied in accordance with the opinion of the MDM. CONCLUSION: MDM appears in most cases in this study not to modify the patient-physician relationship. Due to the patient confidence into the referring physician, the role of this one is essential in integrating the decisional multidisciplinary opinion of MDM and it is important to ensure from his/her disengagement in the decisional process

Prostate Bed Delineation Guidelines for Postoperative Radiation Therapy: On Behalf Of The Francophone Group of Urological Radiation Therapy

International audienc

Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in pediatric patients: preliminary toxicity results of a national prospective multicenter study.

While hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been largely adopted in the adult setting, its use remains limited in pediatric patients. This is due, among other factors, to fear of potential toxicities of hypofractionated regimens at a young age. In this context, we report the preliminary acute (<3 months from SBRT) and middle-term (3-24 months) toxicity results of a national prospective study investigating SBRT in pediatric patients. Between 2013 and 2019, 61 patients were included. The first 40 patients (median age: 12 y, range: 3-20) who completed a 2-year-follow-up were included in the present analysis. SBRT was used for treating lung, brain or (para)spinal lesions, either as first irradiation (35%) or in the reirradiation setting (65%). Acute and middle-term grade ≥2 toxicities occurred in 12.5 and 7.5% of the patients, respectively. No grade ≥4 toxicities occurred. Almost all toxicities occurred in the reirradiation setting. SBRT showed a favorable safety profile in young patients treated for lung, brain, and (para)spinal lesions. SBRT appeared to be safe in pediatric patients treated for multiple oncology indications. These results support further evaluation of SBRT, which may have a role to play in this patient population in the future

Online quality control, hyperfractionated radiotherapy alone and reduced boost volume for standard risk medulloblastoma: long-term results of MSFOP 98.

International audiencePURPOSE: To determine event free and overall survival, and long-term cognitive sequelae of children with standard-risk medulloblastoma (SRM) treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy, conformal reduced boost volume without chemotherapy, and online quality assurance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (age 5 to 18 years) were included in the Medulloblastoma-Société Française d'Oncologie Pédiatrique (MSFOP 98) protocol (December 1998 to October 2001). Patients received hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT; 36 Gy, 1 Gy/fraction twice per day) to the craniospinal axis followed by a boost to the tumor bed (1.5-cm margin) to a dose of 68 Gy. Records of craniospinal irradiation were reviewed before treatment started. Neuropsychologic evaluations were done according to the protocol (1, 3, 5, and 7 years after irradiation). Cognitive outcomes were followed longitudinally with full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) obtained with age-adapted Wechsler scales. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 77.7 months, 6-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates for the cohort were 78% (95% CI, 66% to 90%) and 75%, respectively (95% CI, 62% to 87%). Thanks to quality control, 14 major deviations were detected. Annual full scale IQ decline was 2 points over a 6-year period. Predicted change in FSIQ points per year was 2.15 (95% CI, -1.24 to 3.51) with an intercept (ie, predicted FSIQ) of 93.57 at baseline. CONCLUSION: HFRT protocol with conformal reduced boost and online quality control allows excellent long-term OS and EFS in the absence of chemotherapy. In addition, FSIQ drops seem to be less pronounced than previously reported with standard irradiation regimens

Complete Pathological Response Following Radiochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Short and Long-term Outcome

International audienceBackground/Aim: Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) followed by total mesorectum excision has become the gold standard for locally advanced carcinoma of the low and middle rectum. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of patients in complete pathological response (PR) following this treatment sequence. Patients and Methods: One hundred and thirty patients were retrospectively included between 2005 and 2017 in an expert centre, with 3 groups formed, according to the PR: i) complete PR (absence of tumour cells on the surgical specimen ypT0N0), ii) partial PR (T or N downsizing) and iii) without PR. Results: The complete PR rate was 13.1%. The complete PR group tended to develop less symptomatic fistulas compared to partial PR and without PR groups (5.8% versus 13.5% versus 18.7, respectively; p=0.607). The 5-year disease-free survival was increased for complete-PR patients (93% versus 79% versus 47%, respectively; p=0.0003) without an improvement in overall survival. Conclusion: Complete PR is associated with an improvement in survival without recurrence and without an improvement in the overall survival at 5 years

Weekly Adaptive Radiotherapy vs Standard Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Improving Salivary Function in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

International audienceImportance: Xerostomia is a major toxic effect associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancers.Objective: To assess whether adaptive radiotherapy (ART) improves salivary function compared with IMRT in patients with head and neck cancer.Design, setting, and participants: This phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 11 French centers. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with stage III-IVB squamous cell oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy were enrolled between July 5, 2013, and October 1, 2018. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to May 2022.Interventions: The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard IMRT (without replanning) or ART (systematic weekly replanning).Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the frequency of xerostomia, measured by stimulating salivary flow with paraffin. Secondary end points included salivary gland excretory function measured using technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy, patient-reported outcomes (Eisbruch xerostomia-specific questionnaire and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer questionnaire), early and late toxic effects, disease control, and overall and cancer-specific survival.Results: A total of 132 patients were randomized, and after 1 exclusion in the ART arm, 131 were analyzed: 66 in the ART arm (mean [SD] age at inclusion, 60 [8] years; 57 [86.4%] male) and 65 in the standard IMRT arm (mean [SD] age at inclusion, 60 [8] years; 57 [87.7%] male). The median follow-up was 26.4 months (IQR, 1.2-31.3 months). The mean (SD) salivary flow (paraffin) at 12 months was 630 (450) mg/min in the ART arm and 584 (464) mg/min in the standard arm (P = .64). The mean (SD) excretory function of the parotid gland at 12 months, measured by scintigraphy, improved in the ART arm (48% [17%]) compared with the standard arm (41% [17%]) (P = .02). The 2-year-overall survival was 76.9% (95% CI, 64.7%-85.4%) in both arms.Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial did not demonstrate a benefit of ART in decreasing xerostomia compared with standard IMRT. No significant differences were found in secondary end points except for parotid gland excretory function, as assessed by scintigraphy, or in survival rates.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01874587