Sex Differential in 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Levels in the Lumen of Human Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is a promising medical therapy for the prevention of intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture. Recently, we found that men have a better response to aspirin than women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a sex differential exists in the level of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) in the lumen of human IAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing coiling or stent-assisted coiling for a saccular IA at our institution were enrolled. Two samples (A and B) were collected from IA lumens, and the plasma level of 15-PGDH was measured using an ELISA-based method. The study included 38 patients, with 20 women and 18 men. Women and men were comparable on baseline characteristics. The mean plasma concentration of 15-PGDH did not differ statistically between sample A (62.8±16.2 ng/mL) and sample B (61.8±17.9 ng/mL; 95% confidence interval -6.6 to 9.4). The mean plasma concentration of 15-PGDH in IA lumens of samples A and B was significantly higher in men (73.8±13.5 ng/mL) than women (49.6±7.8 ng/mL; P\u3c0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher enzyme levels of 15-PGDH exist in the lumen of IAs of men compared with women. This observation could explain why aspirin confers better protection against IA rupture in men than in women. The susceptibility of an individual to aspirin may differ according to the level of 15-PGDH

Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Evaluation and Management.

There has been increased detection of incidental AVMs as result of the frequent use of advanced imaging techniques. The natural history of AVM is poorly understood and its management is controversial. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, natural history, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of AVMs. The authors discussed the imaging techniques available for detecting AVMs with regard to the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality. Furthermore, this review paper discusses the factors that must be considered for the most appropriate management strategy (based on the current evidence in the literature) and the risks and benefits of each management option

Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case Report

Cerebrovascular venous thrombosis is an uncommon entity that may occur in the sinuses of the dura, the cortical veins, or the deep venous system. Common etiologies include states of hypercoagulability, such as oral contraceptives intake, malignancy, and trauma. Additional causes include inherent thrombophilic states, such as those caused by systemic lupus erythematosus, protein C or S deficiency, and antithrombin III deficiency. The pathogenesis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis stems from the obstruction of venous outflow. Consequently, venous engorgement occurs, leading to decreased effective blood flow and white matter edema. Infarction or hemorrhage are not uncommon in the setting of venous thrombosis. Intracranial pressure also rises. The most common presenting symptom is headache.2,3 The impact of intracranial hypotension due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak on venous flow and thrombosis is not clear.1, 4-8, 10, 11 We present the case and treatment course of a patient who initially presented with an acute venous sinus thrombosis and in was later found to have a CSF leak and intracranial hypotension

Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Evaluation and Management

There has been increased detection of incidental AVMs as result of the frequent use of advanced imaging techniques. The natural history of AVM is poorly understood and its management is controversial. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, natural history, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of AVMs. The authors discussed the imaging techniques available for detecting AVMs with regard to the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality. Furthermore, this review paper discusses the factors that must be considered for the most appropriate management strategy (based on the current evidence in the literature) and the risks and benefits of each management option

Flow-diversion panacea or poison?

Endovascular therapy is now the treatment of choice for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) for its efficacy and safety profile. The use of flow diversion (FD) has recently expanded to cover many types of IAs in various locations. Some institutions even attempt FD as first line treatment for unruptured IAs. The most widely used devices are the pipeline embolization device (PED), the SILK flow diverter (SFD), the flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED), and Surpass. Many questions were raised regarding the long-term complications, the optimal regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy, and the durability of treatment effect. We reviewed the literature to address these questions as well as other concerns on FD when treating IAs

Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Mycotic Aneurysm: A Review of the Literature and Single Center Experience

The management of mycotic aneurysm has always been subject to controversy. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the intracranial infected aneurysm from pathogenesis till management while focusing mainly on the endovascular interventions. This novel solution seems to provide additional benefits and long-term favorable outcomes

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Management of Cavernous Malformations

Cavernous malformations (CMs) are abnormal vascular formations of the brain with an estimated incidence of 0.4%-0.8% in the general population.1 CMs have the potential to cause significant morbidity, and have been associated with epileptic seizures, intracranial hemorrhage, and focal neurological deficits.2 Management options include non-treatment, surgical resection, and radiosurgery. We review here the efficacy of different management strategies for cavernous malformations and highlight the specific role of radiosurgery. One of the major complications of cerebral cavernous malformations is intracranial hemorrhage. To optimize patient treatment, it is beneficial to be able to identify patients that are at an increased risk of developing a hemorrhage and would most benefit from intervention. The overall rate of hemorrhage in patients with CMs has been estimated to be 2.25%.3 The rate of hemorrhage, however, is significantly affected by the initial symptom presentation. Patients presenting with a hemorrhage have significantly higher rates of rehemorrhage compared to patients presenting due to incidental findings.3,4 Flemming et al. found that patients presenting with hemorrhage had an overall annual rate of hemorrhage of 6.19% compared to patients presenting without hemorrhage of 0.33%. With increasing use of MR imaging, the percentage of cavernous malformations found incidentally approaches 40%.1 Because the risk of hemorrhage is low in patients with CMs found incidentally, surgical or radiosurgery management may not be indicated. In contrast, patients presenting with symptoms of hemorrhage should be considered for therapeutic intervention due to a high risk for subsequent hemorrhage. One option for the management of cavernous malformations is surgical intervention by CM resection. There is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the effectiveness of CM resection, likely due to different methodologies used for determining efficacy. When post-operative outcomes are compared to pre-operative values, significant improvement is observed as demonstrated by improvements in the modified Rankin scale and decreased annual hemorrhage rate.5,6 However, the results are limited by the fact that studies did not include a control group of patients that did not receive surgery. A recent retrospective study by Moultrie and colleagues compared the outcome of patients treated with surgical to conservative management. Patients who underwent CM resection had worsened short-term disability scores, increased risk of developing intracranial hemorrhage, and new focal neurologic deficits.