Perfil inmunofenotípico de cáncer de mama de pacientes atendidas en un hospital general de Lima, Perú

Immunohistochemistry (IH) allows to classify breast cancer in subtypes that are relevant for treatment and prognosis. Compared to genetic markers, IH is cheaper, easier to perform and has good correlation with molecular subtypes. Objective: To describe the immune phenotypic profile of patients with breast cancer attended at a public hospital in Lima, Peru. Methods: Cross-sectional study that included all cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed from May 1st 2015 to April 30, 2017. Histopathological description was performed and cases were classified based on current protocols into four subtypes. Results: 330 cases were included; 71 were excluded; 259 were left for analysis. Mean age was 54.64 ± 14.07 years. In half of cases the cancer was located in the right breast. The invasive ductal carcinoma accounted for 88.03% of cases; the intermediate histological degree was found in 53.28% of cases. The molecular subtype Luminal A accounted for 40.15% and only 11.97% were non-luminal HER2/neu positive. Conclusions: One in four cases of breast cancer presented with the IH pattern of HER2/neu positive, while the most common IH subtype was Luminal A. Histological degree was associated with the IH subtype.La inmunohistoquímica permite clasificar al cáncer de mama en subtipos que tienen relevancia para el tratamiento y pronóstico. En comparación con los marcadores genéticos, la inmunohistoquímica es de costos accesibles, más fácil de realizar y tiene buena correlación con los subtipos moleculares. Objetivo: Describir el perfil inmunohistoquímico de cáncer de mama en pacientes atendidos en un hospital general de Lima, Perú. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y retrospectivo que incluyó todos los casos de carcinoma invasivo de mama diagnosticados entre el 1 de mayo de 2015 y el 30 de abril del 2017. Se realizó la descripción histopatológica de los casos y se los clasificó de acuerdo con los protocolos actuales en cuatro subtipos. Resultados: Se reportaron 330 casos de cáncer de mama, 71 fueron excluidos, quedando 259 para el estudio. La media de edad fue de 54,64 ± 14,07. La neoplasia se localizó de la mama derecha en la mitad de casos. El 88,03% correspondió al tipo histológico carcinoma invasivo ductal no especial, y el grado histológico fue intermedio en el 53,28% de los casos. El subtipo molecular fue Luminal A en el 40,15% del total, y solo un 11,97% de las muestras fueron HER2/neu positivo no luminal. Conclusiones: Uno de cada cuatro casos de cancer de mama presentó una inmunohistoquímica de Her2/neu positivo, mientras que el subtipo inmunohistoquímico más común de carcinoma de mama invasivo fue Luminal A. De igual forma, el grado histológico se asocia al subtipo inmunohistoquímico

The population’s perceptions of generic drugs compared to original brand-name drugs in Peruvian hospitals

El objetivo del estudio fue conocer la percepción de la población con respecto a medicamentos genéricos, frente a los medicamentos de marca, en hospitales del Perú. Participaron del estudio 4.914 personas mayores de 18 años, de 13 ciudades del Perú; clasificándolas en Lima, grandes y pequeñas ciudades. Se exploraron características socioeconómicas, demográficas y de percepción de medicamentos genéricos, en comparación con los medicamentos de marca. Determinando las asociaciones para cada cruce de variables, se calcularon razones de prevalencias (RP) y sus intervalos del 95% de confianza (IC95%), usando regresiones de Poisson crudas y ajustadas con varianza robusta con Stata 14.0. De los 4.914 participantes, el 46,7% estaban de acuerdo con que los medicamentos genéricos son menos eficaces que los medicamentos de marca, el 49,3% ha recomendado o recomendaría a otras personas el uso de medicamentos genéricos, además, el análisis multivariado encontró que las personas que tenían un ingreso económico menor a PEN 1.000 estaban predispuestas a recomendar un medicamento genérico (RP = 1,36; IC95%: 1,14-1,63). Los resultados ponen en manifiesto que la población peruana aún tiene conceptos equívocos y baja aceptación a los medicamentos genéricos. El presente estudio debería servir para desarrollar políticas de salud, que velen por el bajo costo y calidad a la hora de escoger un medicamento

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit

Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research