14 research outputs found

    Benefit of Phonemic Cueing in Alzheimer's Disease Patients' Naming Performance: Baseline Correlates and Predictive Utility

    No full text
    Word-finding difficulty, especially when confronted with naming items, is a well-known problem that many individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) encounter. The use of neuropsychological measures, imaging technology, and genetic research has all contributed to the understanding of naming deficits in AD and the underlying cognitive processes involved. The effects of providing cues during confrontation naming tasks have also been studied, and research has suggested overall benefits of phonemic cueing. This research project further investigated the benefits of phonemic cueing cross-sectionally and longitudinally among a large sample (N = 1104) of individuals with mild to moderate AD. Cross-sectionally, the study examined neuropsychological and socio-demographic correlates of phonemic cueing benefit, as well as potential modifying effects of genetic vulnerability and dementia severity. Longitudinally, the study determined whether phonemic cueing benefit predicts rate of decline on several dementia severity measures. Results indicated that, consistent with previous literature, mild AD subjects benefited from phonemic cues significantly more than moderate AD subjects. Individuals with higher premorbid IQ were found to benefit more from phonemic cueing, which was expected given research findings on the effects of education on cognitive reserve. Women and men were comparable in overall confrontation naming ability, which contradicted current literature, and women were found to benefit more than men from phonemic cues. Confrontation naming ability accounted for the observed inverse relationship between age and phonemic cueing benefit. Observed differences in PCI between carriers and noncarriers of the ApoE ε4 allele were also accounted for by confrontation naming ability, with carriers performing better on naming tasks compared to noncarriers. Phonemic cueing benefit uniquely contributed to baseline cognitive performance on some semantic measures, phonemic fluency, and one non-semantic visuospatial task. Only lower levels of baseline dementia severity and older age predicted less cognitive impairment at 2-year follow-up.Psychology, Department o

    Predictors of Rate of Cognitive and Functional Decline in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

    No full text
    Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a known risk factor for conversion to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Although substantial research has been conducted on the general profile of amnestic MCI subjects and predictors of conversion to AD, the research on predictors of rate of decline has been less comprehensive and studied. The present study sought to fill the gaps in this portion of research by systematically and comprehensively examining predictors of rate of decline in a longitudinal sample of individuals with MCI. Specifically, this study identified predictors of rate of cognitive and functional decline, including age, genetic vulnerability, baseline cognitive performance, baseline functional ability, and baseline neuropsychiatric severity. Participants with single or multi-domain aMCI (N = 151) were assessed at baseline and for a mean of 1.32 follow-up visits (mean interval from baseline to last follow-up = 1.61 years). Results showed that carriers of the ApoE ε4 allele declined more quickly on all three dementia severity measures, but not on instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) functioning, compared to non-carriers. Older individuals declined more rapidly on iADL functioning (but not in dementia severity). Participants with average baseline iADL ratio scores declined more quickly compared to participants with above or below average baseline iADL ratio scores. Participants with lower Executive Functions composite scores at baseline declined more quickly on dementia severity measures but more slowly on iADL functioning. In addition, lower Memory composite scores at baseline predicted faster decline on iADL functioning only. Greater memory impairment severity (operationalized as the number of memory scores in the impaired range) at baseline predicted faster decline on the MMSE in particular. Contrary to hypotheses, those with lower levels of depression at baseline declined more rapidly on dementia severity measures compared to those with higher levels of depression. Identifying potential predictors of rate of decline from amnestic MCI to AD could be clinically meaningful for prognostic purposes, understanding risk and protective factors, as well as guiding future treatments and clinical trials that could aim to target and delay progression among those patients who are particularly vulnerable to more quickly convert to AD.Psychology, Department o
    corecore