All-cause mortality in the cohorts of the Spanish AIDS Research Network (RIS) compared with the general population: 1997Ł2010

Abstract Background: Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has produced significant changes in mortality of HIVinfected persons. Our objective was to estimate mortality rates, standardized mortality ratios and excess mortality rates of cohorts of the AIDS Research Network (RIS) (CoRIS-MD and CoRIS) compared to the general population. Methods: We analysed data of CoRIS-MD and CoRIS cohorts from 1997 to 2010. We calculated: (i) all-cause mortality rates, (ii) standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and (iii) excess mortality rates for both cohort for 100 personyears (py) of follow-up, comparing all-cause mortality with that of the general population of similar age and gender. Results: Between 1997 and 2010, 8,214 HIV positive subjects were included, 2,453 (29.9%) in CoRIS-MD and 5,761 (70.1%) in CoRIS and 294 deaths were registered. All-cause mortality rate was 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.15) per 100 py, SMR was 6.8 (95% CI 5.9-7.9) and excess mortality rate was 0.8 (95% CI 0.7-0.9) per 100 py. Mortality was higher in patients with AIDS, hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection, and those from CoRIS-MD cohort (1997. Conclusion: Mortality among HIV-positive persons remains higher than that of the general population of similar age and sex, with significant differences depending on the history of AIDS or HCV coinfection

How Novice EFL Teachers Regulate Their Negative Emotions

This research report shares the findings that emerged from a qualitative study in which the main objective was to discover whether or not novice English as a foreign language teachers regulate their negative emotions during their initial teaching practice, and if so, how they do this. The data were collected by semi-structured interviews and observations, and analyzed by microanalysis and constant comparative analysis. The participants were five novice teachers who study English at the same university, and who were giving classes as part of their internship. The results from this research revealed that these particular novice English as a foreign language teachers use different emotional strategies to regulate their negative emotions

La magia de las palabras

Este proyecto fomenta las actividades ligadas a la lectura, escritura y expresión oral, así como la mejora de la ortografía. La variedad y diversidad de alumnos ESO, Bachillerato, programas de Compensatoria, Diversificación y necesidades educativas especiales, junto al gran número de inmigrantes y minorías étnicas, motiva aún más al profesorado para desarrollar nuevas estrategias de enseñanza y adquirir nuevos recursos didácticos. Los objetivos que plantea el proyecto son acercar los libros y la biblioteca a los alumnos; proporcionar apoyo al programa de enseñanza; asegurar el acceso de toda la comunidad educativa a una amplia gama de recursos y servicios; organizar actividades que contribuyan a compensar las desigualdades formativas y culturales de los alumnos; fomentar el uso correcto de la lengua hablada y escrita; optimizar la competencia lingüística y desarrollar la capacidad de comprensión y expresión; manejar distintos recursos para la búsqueda y clasificación de la información; desarrollar la imaginación, la fantasía y la creatividad en los distintos modos de expresión y despertar aficiones para contribuir al disfrute del ocio y del tiempo libre de forma creativa y culta. Las actividades se desarrollan en cuatro ejes: la biblioteca, la revista, los recursos informáticos y el cuenta cuentos. La metodología se caracteriza por la coordinación y colaboración en todas las actividades. Durante el primer trimestre se realizan las funciones de selección de material y puesta en marcha de los ejercicios como organizar el grupo de teatro, el coro, seleccionar los encargados de los cuenta cuentos, publicación del quinto número de la revista La Cucaña o participar dentro de la Semana de la Ciencia en el proyecto Comenius que organiza la Universidad Carlos III. Durante el segundo y el tercer trimestre el proyecto gira en torno a la Jornada Cultural en mayo con el lema Cuentos, Leyendas y Canciones del Mundo. Se elaboran materiales para poder ser utilizados en proyectos posteriores como paneles, murales, material audiovisual o unidades didácticas. La evaluación es continua, a través de reuniones periódicas, en las que se valora el número y la calidad de las actividades realizadas y los resultados obtenidos. También se valora la opinión del alumnado. Los anexos aportan gran cantidad de material elaborado durante este curso escolar..Madrid (Comunidad Autónoma). Consejería de Educación. Dirección General de Mejora de la Calidad de la EnseñanzaMadridMadrid (Comunidad Autónoma). Subdirección General de Formación del Profesorado. CRIF Las Acacias; General Ricardos 179 - 28025 Madrid; Tel. + 34915250893ES

Vivir.com

Se desarrolla un proyecto de innovación educativa que pretende mejorar la comunicación, el trato y el respeto entre iguales, fomentando la convivencia y ayudando a detectar y afrontar problemas básicos en resolución de conflictos desde la práctica educativa diaria. El plan de trabajo se adapta a las necesidades del colegio con la organización de los recursos humanos y materiales. El proyecto se desarrolla en todos los cursos y niveles del centro implicando a toda la comunidad educativa y especialmente a las familias. En una primera fase se han llevado a acabo actividades de toma de contacto, sensibilización y formación de profesores, padres y alumnos. En una segunda fase, se desarrollan las actividades más participativas dirigidas a los alumnos en los diferentes niveles educativos. Y por último en una tercera fase, el inicio de las tutorías y actividades más específicas, con futura continuidad en los conocimientos básicos para la futura mediación entre iguales como estrategia en la resolución de conflictos en educación Primaria y Educación Secundaria. La metodología es fundamentalmente es activa, donde el profesorado y el alumnado son protagonistas del proceso de creación, desarrollo y aprendizaje. Los principios metodológicos utilizados son comunes a todas las actuaciones pedagógicas como trabajar la adquisición de estrategias de exploración y descubrimiento en el proceso de construcción de los conocimientos, partir de los conocimientos previos y aplicación de las nuevas tecnologías a la educación. Tras la aplicación del proyecto se ha dado una respuesta para favorecer el aprendizaje de loa alumnos y alumnas y se ha fomentado el trabajo en equipo. Se han desarrollado actitudes de respeto y valoración positiva adecuados a las necesidades educativas diarias en relación al trato con iguales, respeto sentimientos y empatía.Castilla y LeónConsejería de Educación. Dirección General de Universidades e Investigación; Monasterio de Nuestra Señora de Prado, Autovía Puente Colgante s. n.; 47071 Valladolid; +34983411881; +34983411939ES

Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX ). Methods In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence. Results A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I2 = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3% of the weight in the meta-analysis. Conclusions Convalescent plasma treatment of patients with COVID-19 did not reduce all-cause mortality. These results provide strong evidence that convalescent plasma treatment for patients with COVID-19 should not be used outside of randomized trials. Evidence synthesis from collaborations among trial investigators can inform both evidence generation and evidence application in patient care

Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX ). Methods In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence. Results A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I2 = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3% of the weight in the meta-analysis. Conclusions Convalescent plasma treatment of patients with COVID-19 did not reduce all-cause mortality. These results provide strong evidence that convalescent plasma treatment for patients with COVID-19 should not be used outside of randomized trials. Evidence synthesis from collaborations among trial investigators can inform both evidence generation and evidence application in patient care