Entre bidonvilles et logements de masse. Un projet pour 58 familles relogées à Santiago du Chili (commune de Renca)

Ce projet de master, basé sur une situation réelle, s'inscrit dans la problématique complexe de l'habitat des pauvres de Santiago du Chili. Il s'insère au sein d'un projet mené par une ONG locale. Mon rôle est de collaborer en tant qu'architecte à un projet interdisciplinaire chilien (social, politique, économique...). Il s'agit de projeter un quartier d'habitations destiné à reloger 58 familles qui habitent actuellement le même bidonville (Parcela 4). Le contexte urbain L'expansion urbaine de Santiago, rapide et peu dense, repousse toujours plus loin du centre les nouveaux quartiers de logements sociaux. D'autre part, la métropole recèle de terrains résiduels, créés par un modèle géométrique de planification urbaine peu contextualisée. Aujourd'hui, afin de réduire cette expansion urbaine démesurée, ces nombreux terrains représentent un potentiel important de densification urbaine. Le projet, implanté sur un terrain résiduel de Renca (commune périphérique) profite de la proximité des services de base tout en étant proche de Parcela 4 et du centre. Le quartier Je considère que ces 58 familles sont détentrices d'une précieuse richesse sociale (solidarité, réseau social) créée et entretenue par les conditions de vie extrêmes des bidonvilles. Il s'agit de la préserver tout en améliorant le confort matériel des logements. La diversité, la participation et la progressivité sont trois autres concepts développés ici liés à l'identification et donc à la durabilité du projet

ملف تفصيلي لاستجابة المأوى في اليمن: بناء ثقافات محلية من أجل مساكن مستدامة وقادرة على الصمود

International audienceعملت المنظمات القائمة على هذا الكتيب (انظر الغلاف الخلفي) لعدة سنوات على إعداد طريقة تعريفية لثقافات وممارسات البناء المحلي ونشرها، لا سيما فيما يخص قدرتها على المساهمة في الحد من مخاطر الكوارث، وأيضاً لاستجابات المأوى والمسكن في أوضاع ما بعد الصراع. والهدف هو تيسير تحديد مواطن القوة والضعف لثقافات وممارسات البناء المحلي والفرص التي تقدمها – في نسخة معدلة إذا لزم الأمر – في مشاريع إعادة بناء المسكن أو تعديله أو تحسينه. من المهم عند القيام بهذا العمل الوضع في عين الاعتبار أن الأسر والمجتمعات غالباً ما تعيش في بيئات متقلبة بسبب عوامل كثيرة منها النزاعات وتغيرات المناخ والتحضر والعولمة وتغير التصرفات الثقافية الاجتماعية، ولهذا – وإن كانت الممارسات المحلية ذات مغزى – تظهر التحديات، ومن المستحسن الوصول الى حلول محلية يمكن إدارتها وتحديد الابتكارات التي من الممكن تكييفها لتحقيق تنمية مستدامة ورفع قدرة المرونة المحلية.دراسة استجابة المأوى جزء من مجموعة أوسع من الأدوات والمستندات، وهي واحدة من أنشطة الخطوة 1: فهم سياق بروتوكول توجيه اختيار مأوى أفضل (لمزيد من المعلومات انظر الرابط في المربع أدناه)، الذي أعدته “مجموعة عمل تعزيز بناء أكثر أماناً” (التعافي الذاتي) من كتلة المأوى العالمية.تقدم هذه الوثيقة بيانات مرجعية عن ثقافات البناء المحلية والاستراتيجيات الاجتماعية والثقافية التي تساعد في تعزيز مرونة الناس. كما توضح معايير التقييم التي يمكن أن تساعد في تطوير استراتيجيات المشاريع المتكيفة محلياً.تختلف السياقات والتفاصيل من مكان إلى آخر، ويستفيد أصحاب المصلحة من البيانات المجمعة لاتخاذ قرارات شاملة ودقيقة. وبالتالي، لا ينبغي اعتبار دراسة استجابة المأوى شاملة، فهي تمثل مستوى أول من المعلومات التي يجب تعميقها من خلال التحليل الميداني لسياق التدخل المحدد، ولهذا من المهم بمكان تنظيم المسوحات الميدانية التي ستسمح أيضاً بالتناقش مع الجهات الفاعلة المحلية والسكان حول القيود والإمكانيات في مواطنهم من ناحية الوصول إلى الأراضي وأنماط الحياة والموارد المادية والبشرية والممارسات والمعرفة وقدرات البناء

Detailed shelter response profile Yemen: local building cultures for sustainable and resilient habitats

International audienceThe organisations backing this document (see back cover) have been working for several years on the elaboration and dissemination of an identification method for local building cultures and practices (LBC/LBP), especially regarding their potential to contribute to Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), and also to shelter and housing responses in post-conflict situations. The aim is to facilitate the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of LBC/LBP and the opportunities they offer – in an adapted version if necessary – in housing reconstruction, retrofitting or improvement projects. In doing so, it is essential to consider that families and communities often live in changing environments due to factors such as conflict, climate change, urbanization, globalization, and changing socio-cultural attitudes. Thus, even if local practices are meaningful, they are challenged, and it is still advisable to find locally manageable solutions and limit innovations so that they can be adopted toward sustainable development and increased local resilience capacity. SRPs are part of a broader set of tools and documents. They are one of the activities of Step 1 Understanding the context of the Protocol Informing choice for better shelter (see link in the box “To find out more” below), developed by the “Promoting Safer Building Working Group” (Self-recovery) of the Global Shelter Cluster.This document introduces reference data on local building cultures and sociocultural strategies that result in people’s resilience. It also provides evaluation criteria that can help in elaborating locally adapted project- strategies. Context and details differ from place to place, and stakeholders benefit from the collected data to make comprehensive and accurate decisions. Thus, SRPs should not be considered exhaustive. They are just a first level of information that needs to be deepened through field analysis of the specific intervention context. Therefore, it remains essential to organize field surveys that will also allow exchanges with local actors and inhabitants on the constraints and potentials of their territories in terms of access to land, lifestyles, material and human resources, practices, knowledge and construction capacities

Detailed shelter response profile Yemen: local building cultures for sustainable and resilient habitats

International audienceThe organisations backing this document (see back cover) have been working for several years on the elaboration and dissemination of an identification method for local building cultures and practices (LBC/LBP), especially regarding their potential to contribute to Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), and also to shelter and housing responses in post-conflict situations. The aim is to facilitate the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of LBC/LBP and the opportunities they offer – in an adapted version if necessary – in housing reconstruction, retrofitting or improvement projects. In doing so, it is essential to consider that families and communities often live in changing environments due to factors such as conflict, climate change, urbanization, globalization, and changing socio-cultural attitudes. Thus, even if local practices are meaningful, they are challenged, and it is still advisable to find locally manageable solutions and limit innovations so that they can be adopted toward sustainable development and increased local resilience capacity. SRPs are part of a broader set of tools and documents. They are one of the activities of Step 1 Understanding the context of the Protocol Informing choice for better shelter (see link in the box “To find out more” below), developed by the “Promoting Safer Building Working Group” (Self-recovery) of the Global Shelter Cluster.This document introduces reference data on local building cultures and sociocultural strategies that result in people’s resilience. It also provides evaluation criteria that can help in elaborating locally adapted project- strategies. Context and details differ from place to place, and stakeholders benefit from the collected data to make comprehensive and accurate decisions. Thus, SRPs should not be considered exhaustive. They are just a first level of information that needs to be deepened through field analysis of the specific intervention context. Therefore, it remains essential to organize field surveys that will also allow exchanges with local actors and inhabitants on the constraints and potentials of their territories in terms of access to land, lifestyles, material and human resources, practices, knowledge and construction capacities

Detailed shelter response profile Yemen: local building cultures for sustainable and resilient habitats

International audienceThe organisations backing this document (see back cover) have been working for several years on the elaboration and dissemination of an identification method for local building cultures and practices (LBC/LBP), especially regarding their potential to contribute to Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), and also to shelter and housing responses in post-conflict situations. The aim is to facilitate the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of LBC/LBP and the opportunities they offer – in an adapted version if necessary – in housing reconstruction, retrofitting or improvement projects. In doing so, it is essential to consider that families and communities often live in changing environments due to factors such as conflict, climate change, urbanization, globalization, and changing socio-cultural attitudes. Thus, even if local practices are meaningful, they are challenged, and it is still advisable to find locally manageable solutions and limit innovations so that they can be adopted toward sustainable development and increased local resilience capacity. SRPs are part of a broader set of tools and documents. They are one of the activities of Step 1 Understanding the context of the Protocol Informing choice for better shelter (see link in the box “To find out more” below), developed by the “Promoting Safer Building Working Group” (Self-recovery) of the Global Shelter Cluster.This document introduces reference data on local building cultures and sociocultural strategies that result in people’s resilience. It also provides evaluation criteria that can help in elaborating locally adapted project- strategies. Context and details differ from place to place, and stakeholders benefit from the collected data to make comprehensive and accurate decisions. Thus, SRPs should not be considered exhaustive. They are just a first level of information that needs to be deepened through field analysis of the specific intervention context. Therefore, it remains essential to organize field surveys that will also allow exchanges with local actors and inhabitants on the constraints and potentials of their territories in terms of access to land, lifestyles, material and human resources, practices, knowledge and construction capacities

Reconstruction with local architecture. Panay_Island. Philippines. 2104 - 2017

International audienc

Reconstruction with local architecture. Panay_Island. Philippines. 2104 - 2017

International audienc

Reconstruction with local architecture. Panay_Island. Philippines. 2104 - 2017

International audienc