Transcriptome-wide identification of A > I RNA editing sites by inosine specific cleavage

Adenosine to inosine (A > I) RNA editing, which is catalyzed by the ADAR family of proteins, is one of the fundamental mechanisms by which transcriptomic diversity is generated. Indeed, a number of genome-wide analyses have shown that A > I editing is not limited to a few mRNAs, as originally thought, but occurs widely across the transcriptome, especially in the brain. Importantly, there is increasing evidence that A > I editing is essential for animal development and nervous system function. To more efficiently characterize the complete catalog of ADAR events in the mammalian transcriptome we developed a high-throughput protocol to identify A > I editing sites, which exploits the capacity of glyoxal to protect guanosine, but not inosine, from RNAse T1 treatment, thus facilitating extraction of RNA fragments with inosine bases at their termini for high-throughput sequencing. Using this method we identified 665 editing sites in mouse brain RNA, including most known sites and suite of novel sites that include nonsynonymous changes to protein-coding genes, hyperediting of genes known to regulate p53, and alterations to non-protein-coding RNAs. This method is applicable to any biological system for the de novo discovery of A > I editing sites, and avoids the complicated informatic and practical issues associated with editing site identification using traditional RNA sequencing data. This approach has the potential to substantially increase our understanding of the extent and function of RNA editing, and thereby to shed light on the role of transcriptional plasticity in evolution, development, and cognition

Embryonic hematopoiesis modulates the inflammatory response and larval hematopoiesis in Drosophila

International audienceRecent lineage tracing analyses have significantly improved our understanding of immune system development and highlighted the importance of the different hematopoietic waves. The current challenge is to understand whether these waves interact and whether this affects the function of the immune system. Here we report a molecular pathway regulating the immune response and involving the communication between embryonic and larval hematopoietic waves in Drosophila. Down-regulating the transcription factor Gcm specific to embryonic hematopoiesis enhances the larval phenotypes induced by over-expressing the pro-inflammatory Jak/Stat pathway or by wasp infestation. Gcm works by modulating the transduction of the Upd cytokines to the site of larval hematopoiesis and hence the response to chronic (Jak/Stat over-expression) and acute (wasp infestation) immune challenges. Thus, homeostatic interactions control the function of the immune system in physiology and pathology. Our data also indicate that a transiently expressed developmental pathway has a long-lasting effect on the immune response

Functional Conservation of the Glide/Gcm Regulatory Network Controlling Glia, Hemocyte, and Tendon Cell Differentiation in Drosophila.

High-throughput screens allow us to understand how transcription factors trigger developmental processes, including cell specification. A major challenge is identification of their binding sites because feedback loops and homeostatic interactions may mask the direct impact of those factors in transcriptome analyses. Moreover, this approach dissects the downstream signaling cascades and facilitates identification of conserved transcriptional programs. Here we show the results and the validation of a DNA adenine methyltransferase identification (DamID) genome-wide screen that identifies the direct targets of Glide/Gcm, a potent transcription factor that controls glia, hemocyte, and tendon cell differentiation in Drosophila. The screen identifies many genes that had not been previously associated with Glide/Gcm and highlights three major signaling pathways interacting with Glide/Gcm: Notch, Hedgehog, and JAK/STAT, which all involve feedback loops. Furthermore, the screen identifies effector molecules that are necessary for cell-cell interactions during late developmental processes and/or in ontogeny. Typically, immunoglobulin (Ig) domain-containing proteins control cell adhesion and axonal navigation. This shows that early and transiently expressed fate determinants not only control other transcription factors that, in turn, implement a specific developmental program but also directly affect late developmental events and cell function. Finally, while the mammalian genome contains two orthologous Gcm genes, their function has been demonstrated in vertebrate-specific tissues, placenta, and parathyroid glands, begging questions on the evolutionary conservation of the Gcm cascade in higher organisms. Here we provide the first evidence for the conservation of Gcm direct targets in humans. In sum, this work uncovers novel aspects of cell specification and sets the basis for further understanding of the role of conserved Gcm gene regulatory cascades.We thank the DHSB and the Bloomington Stock Center for reagents and flies as well as J. Veenstra (INCIA UMR 5287 CNRS, France) for the gift of the Anti-DH31 antibody and B. Altenhein (U Mainz, Germany) for fly strains. We thank K. Jamet for initial bioinformatics analyses. We thank C. Diebold, C. Delaporte, and IGBMC facilities for technical assistance. We thank the members of the lab for valuable input and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by INSERM, CNRS, UDS, Hôpital de Strasbourg, ARC, INCA and ANR grants. A. Popkova and P. Cattenoz were funded by the FRM and by the ANR, respectively. A. Popkova also benefitted from a short Development traveling fellowship to visit the laboratory of A. Brand in Cambridge (UK). The IGBMC was also supported by a French state fund through the ANR labex. T.D.S and A.H.B were funded by Wellcome Trust Programme Grants 068055 and 092545 to A.H.B. A.H.B acknowledges core funding to the Gurdon Institute from the Wellcome Trust (092096) and CRUK (C6946/A14492).This is the final version of the article. It was first available from the American Genetics Society via http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.18215

The Repo homeodomain transcription factor suppresses hematopoiesis in Drosophila and preserves the glial fate

Despite their different origins, Drosophila glia and hemocytes are related cell populations that provide an immune function. Drosophila hemocytes patrol the body cavity and act as macrophages outside the nervous system whereas glia originate from the neuroepithelium and provide the scavenger population of the nervous system. Drosophila glia are hence the functional orthologs of vertebrate microglia, even though the latter are cells of immune origin that subsequently move into the brain during development. Interestingly, the Drosophila immune cells within (glia) and outside the nervous system (hemocytes) require the same transcription factor Glide/Gcm for their development. This raises the issue of how do glia specifically differentiate in the nervous system and hemocytes in the procephalic mesoderm. The Repo homeodomain transcription factor and pan-glial direct target of Glide/Gcm is known to ensure glial terminal differentiation. Here we show that Repo also takes center stage in the process that discriminates between glia and hemocytes. First, Repo expression is repressed in the hemocyte anlagen by mesoderm-specific factors. Second, Repo ectopic activation in the procephalic mesoderm is sufficient to repress the expression of hemocyte-specific genes. Third, the lack of Repo triggers the expression of hemocyte markers in glia. Thus, a complex network of tissue-specific cues biases the potential of Glide/Gcm. These data allow us to revise the concept of fate determinants and help us understand the bases of cell specification. Both sexes were analyzed.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTDistinct cell types often require the same pioneer transcription factor, raising the issue of how does one factor trigger different fates. In Drosophila, glia and hemocytes provide a scavenger activity within and outside the nervous system, respectively. While they both require the Glide/Gcm transcription factor, glia originate from the ectoderm, hemocytes from the mesoderm. Here we show that tissue-specific factors inhibit the gliogenic potential of Glide/Gcm in the mesoderm by repressing the expression of the homeodomain protein Repo, a major glial-specific target of Glide/Gcm. Repo expression in turn inhibits the expression of hemocyte-specific genes in the nervous system. These cell-specific networks secure the establishment of the glial fate only in the nervous system and allow cell diversification

Characterization of Alu element expression and A-to-I RNA editing in mammals

Les éléments Alu sont les retrotransposons les plus prolifiques chez l’humain avec plus d’1 million de copies occupant plus de 10% du génome. Afin de contrecarrer l’expansion des rétro-éléments, les organismes ont développés différents mécanismes pour préserver l’intégrité de leurs génomes. Le plus proéminent, également utilisé pour lutter contre la réinsertion d’ADN viral dans le génome hôte, est l’édition de l’ARN. Chez les mammifères, la plus courante est la déamination de l’adénine en inosine catalysée par la famille de protéine ADAR dont Les principales cibles sont les éléments Alu chez l’humain. L’édition des éléments Alu conduit à leur séquestration dans le noyau des cellules, mute leurs promoteurs internes, cible de l’ARN polymérase III (POLIII), et leurs queues poly-A, prévenant ainsi leur future rétrotransposition. Dans la première partie de cette étude, l’analyse de données de séquençage haut-débit révèle que ~40% des éléments Alu sont reconnus par POLIII, qu’ils sont présents en tant que petits ARN dans le cytoplasme et le noyau des cellules, que certain d’entre eux sont associés à la chromatine, et que la transcription des éléments Alu est un phénomène courant dans les tissus somatiques qui concorde avec l’expression d’éléments LINE1 fonctionnels. Ceci suggère que la rétrotransposition peut être un mécanisme normal dans la plupart des tissus humains. Enfin, l’analyse de l’expression des éléments Alu et LINE1 chez la souris montre que la transcription de rétrotransposons n’est pas spécifique de l’humain. Dans la seconde partie de cette étude, une nouvelle méthode a été développée pour explorer l’impact de l’édition de l’ARN sur le transcriptome en identifiant les ARN édités par séquençage haut-débit. Dans un premier temps, un anticorps ciblant ADAR a été utilisé pour extraire les ARN associés aux protéines de l’édition. Cette méthode n’étant pas suffisamment efficace, une autre stratégie, qui extrait directement les ARN contenant de l’inosine, a été développée : dans un premier temps, l’ARN est fixé à des billes magnétiques par leurs extrémités 3’, ensuite, les billes sont traitées au glyoxal/acide borique et à la RNAse T1 pour libérer la région 5’ des ARN contenant une ou plusieurs inosines, et enfin, les ARN libérés sont séquencés par séquençage haut débit. En utilisant cette méthode, 1822 sites d’éditions ont été identifiés dans l’ARN de cerveau de souris, incluant 28 nouveaux sites présents dans des séquences codantes qui conduisent à des mutations non-synonymes des futures protéines. Des sites d’éditions ont aussi été observés pour la première fois dans les ARN ribosomaux, les snoRNA et les snRNA.The Alu repeats comprise more than 10% of the human genome. They spread in the genome by retrotransposition. As a response to this invasion, organisms developed mechanisms to preserve the integrity of their genome, such as RNA editing. The most abundant type of editing in mammals is A-to-I editing where the ADAR proteins transform adenosine into inosine and targets mainly Alu elements in human. Editing of the Alu elements leads to their sequestration in the nucleus and mutates their internal POLIII promoter and their poly-A tail, thus preventing their subsequent transposition. In the first part of this study, we challenged the view that Alu elements are dormant occupant of the genome by characterizing their activity. Deep-sequencing data analyses revealed that ~40% of Alu elements can bind POLIII, they present a definite localization in the cell and associate with chromatin and polysomes, and that Alu elements transcription is a widespread phenomenon in normal tissues which correlates with functional LINE1 elements expression. This suggested that Alu element retrotransposition may be a natural mechanism in most normal human tissues. Further analyses showed that SINE and LINE expression in somatic tissues was not exclusive to human but also occurs in mouse. Finally, attempts were made to identify tissue specific insertions in the human genome resulting from retrotransposition events. In the second part of this study, a new method was developed to understand the full impact of RNA editing on transcriptomes by characterizing the edited RNA in a high-throughput fashion. First, immunoprecipitation was attempted to pull-down RNA associated with the editing enzymes ADARs. Since this method was inefficient, another approach purifying directly the edited RNA was developed. First, the RNA was sequestered on magnetic beads. Then an inosine specific cleavage based on RNAseT1 treatment of RNA protected with glyoxal and borate allowed the separation of the edited RNA from the total RNA. Finally, deep sequencing was used to identify edited RNA. 1,822 editing sites were found in mouse brain RNA by this method, including 28 new editing sites modifying the coding sequences of genes and editing in rRNA, snoRNA and snRNA which were never observed before

Characterization of Alu element expression and A-to-I RNA editing in mammals

Les éléments Alu sont les retrotransposons les plus prolifiques chez l’humain avec plus d’1 million de copies occupant plus de 10% du génome. Afin de contrecarrer l’expansion des rétro-éléments, les organismes ont développés différents mécanismes pour préserver l’intégrité de leurs génomes. Le plus proéminent, également utilisé pour lutter contre la réinsertion d’ADN viral dans le génome hôte, est l’édition de l’ARN. Chez les mammifères, la plus courante est la déamination de l’adénine en inosine catalysée par la famille de protéine ADAR dont Les principales cibles sont les éléments Alu chez l’humain. L’édition des éléments Alu conduit à leur séquestration dans le noyau des cellules, mute leurs promoteurs internes, cible de l’ARN polymérase III (POLIII), et leurs queues poly-A, prévenant ainsi leur future rétrotransposition. Dans la première partie de cette étude, l’analyse de données de séquençage haut-débit révèle que ~40% des éléments Alu sont reconnus par POLIII, qu’ils sont présents en tant que petits ARN dans le cytoplasme et le noyau des cellules, que certain d’entre eux sont associés à la chromatine, et que la transcription des éléments Alu est un phénomène courant dans les tissus somatiques qui concorde avec l’expression d’éléments LINE1 fonctionnels. Ceci suggère que la rétrotransposition peut être un mécanisme normal dans la plupart des tissus humains. Enfin, l’analyse de l’expression des éléments Alu et LINE1 chez la souris montre que la transcription de rétrotransposons n’est pas spécifique de l’humain. Dans la seconde partie de cette étude, une nouvelle méthode a été développée pour explorer l’impact de l’édition de l’ARN sur le transcriptome en identifiant les ARN édités par séquençage haut-débit. Dans un premier temps, un anticorps ciblant ADAR a été utilisé pour extraire les ARN associés aux protéines de l’édition. Cette méthode n’étant pas suffisamment efficace, une autre stratégie, qui extrait directement les ARN contenant de l’inosine, a été développée : dans un premier temps, l’ARN est fixé à des billes magnétiques par leurs extrémités 3’, ensuite, les billes sont traitées au glyoxal/acide borique et à la RNAse T1 pour libérer la région 5’ des ARN contenant une ou plusieurs inosines, et enfin, les ARN libérés sont séquencés par séquençage haut débit. En utilisant cette méthode, 1822 sites d’éditions ont été identifiés dans l’ARN de cerveau de souris, incluant 28 nouveaux sites présents dans des séquences codantes qui conduisent à des mutations non-synonymes des futures protéines. Des sites d’éditions ont aussi été observés pour la première fois dans les ARN ribosomaux, les snoRNA et les snRNA.The Alu repeats comprise more than 10% of the human genome. They spread in the genome by retrotransposition. As a response to this invasion, organisms developed mechanisms to preserve the integrity of their genome, such as RNA editing. The most abundant type of editing in mammals is A-to-I editing where the ADAR proteins transform adenosine into inosine and targets mainly Alu elements in human. Editing of the Alu elements leads to their sequestration in the nucleus and mutates their internal POLIII promoter and their poly-A tail, thus preventing their subsequent transposition. In the first part of this study, we challenged the view that Alu elements are dormant occupant of the genome by characterizing their activity. Deep-sequencing data analyses revealed that ~40% of Alu elements can bind POLIII, they present a definite localization in the cell and associate with chromatin and polysomes, and that Alu elements transcription is a widespread phenomenon in normal tissues which correlates with functional LINE1 elements expression. This suggested that Alu element retrotransposition may be a natural mechanism in most normal human tissues. Further analyses showed that SINE and LINE expression in somatic tissues was not exclusive to human but also occurs in mouse. Finally, attempts were made to identify tissue specific insertions in the human genome resulting from retrotransposition events. In the second part of this study, a new method was developed to understand the full impact of RNA editing on transcriptomes by characterizing the edited RNA in a high-throughput fashion. First, immunoprecipitation was attempted to pull-down RNA associated with the editing enzymes ADARs. Since this method was inefficient, another approach purifying directly the edited RNA was developed. First, the RNA was sequestered on magnetic beads. Then an inosine specific cleavage based on RNAseT1 treatment of RNA protected with glyoxal and borate allowed the separation of the edited RNA from the total RNA. Finally, deep sequencing was used to identify edited RNA. 1,822 editing sites were found in mouse brain RNA by this method, including 28 new editing sites modifying the coding sequences of genes and editing in rRNA, snoRNA and snRNA which were never observed before

Caractérisation de l'expression des éléments Alu et du phénomène d'édition de l'ARN chez l'humain et la souris

The Alu repeats comprise more than 10% of the human genome. They spread in the genome by retrotransposition. As a response to this invasion, organisms developed mechanisms to preserve the integrity of their genome, such as RNA editing. The most abundant type of editing in mammals is A-to-I editing where the ADAR proteins transform adenosine into inosine and targets mainly Alu elements in human. Editing of the Alu elements leads to their sequestration in the nucleus and mutates their internal POLIII promoter and their poly-A tail, thus preventing their subsequent transposition. In the first part of this study, we challenged the view that Alu elements are dormant occupant of the genome by characterizing their activity. Deep-sequencing data analyses revealed that ~40% of Alu elements can bind POLIII, they present a definite localization in the cell and associate with chromatin and polysomes, and that Alu elements transcription is a widespread phenomenon in normal tissues which correlates with functional LINE1 elements expression. This suggested that Alu element retrotransposition may be a natural mechanism in most normal human tissues. Further analyses showed that SINE and LINE expression in somatic tissues was not exclusive to human but also occurs in mouse. Finally, attempts were made to identify tissue specific insertions in the human genome resulting from retrotransposition events. In the second part of this study, a new method was developed to understand the full impact of RNA editing on transcriptomes by characterizing the edited RNA in a high-throughput fashion. First, immunoprecipitation was attempted to pull-down RNA associated with the editing enzymes ADARs. Since this method was inefficient, another approach purifying directly the edited RNA was developed. First, the RNA was sequestered on magnetic beads. Then an inosine specific cleavage based on RNAseT1 treatment of RNA protected with glyoxal and borate allowed the separation of the edited RNA from the total RNA. Finally, deep sequencing was used to identify edited RNA. 1,822 editing sites were found in mouse brain RNA by this method, including 28 new editing sites modifying the coding sequences of genes and editing in rRNA, snoRNA and snRNA which were never observed before.Les éléments Alu sont les retrotransposons les plus prolifiques chez l’humain avec plus d’1 million de copies occupant plus de 10% du génome. Afin de contrecarrer l’expansion des rétro-éléments, les organismes ont développés différents mécanismes pour préserver l’intégrité de leurs génomes. Le plus proéminent, également utilisé pour lutter contre la réinsertion d’ADN viral dans le génome hôte, est l’édition de l’ARN. Chez les mammifères, la plus courante est la déamination de l’adénine en inosine catalysée par la famille de protéine ADAR dont Les principales cibles sont les éléments Alu chez l’humain. L’édition des éléments Alu conduit à leur séquestration dans le noyau des cellules, mute leurs promoteurs internes, cible de l’ARN polymérase III (POLIII), et leurs queues poly-A, prévenant ainsi leur future rétrotransposition. Dans la première partie de cette étude, l’analyse de données de séquençage haut-débit révèle que ~40% des éléments Alu sont reconnus par POLIII, qu’ils sont présents en tant que petits ARN dans le cytoplasme et le noyau des cellules, que certain d’entre eux sont associés à la chromatine, et que la transcription des éléments Alu est un phénomène courant dans les tissus somatiques qui concorde avec l’expression d’éléments LINE1 fonctionnels. Ceci suggère que la rétrotransposition peut être un mécanisme normal dans la plupart des tissus humains. Enfin, l’analyse de l’expression des éléments Alu et LINE1 chez la souris montre que la transcription de rétrotransposons n’est pas spécifique de l’humain. Dans la seconde partie de cette étude, une nouvelle méthode a été développée pour explorer l’impact de l’édition de l’ARN sur le transcriptome en identifiant les ARN édités par séquençage haut-débit. Dans un premier temps, un anticorps ciblant ADAR a été utilisé pour extraire les ARN associés aux protéines de l’édition. Cette méthode n’étant pas suffisamment efficace, une autre stratégie, qui extrait directement les ARN contenant de l’inosine, a été développée : dans un premier temps, l’ARN est fixé à des billes magnétiques par leurs extrémités 3’, ensuite, les billes sont traitées au glyoxal/acide borique et à la RNAse T1 pour libérer la région 5’ des ARN contenant une ou plusieurs inosines, et enfin, les ARN libérés sont séquencés par séquençage haut débit. En utilisant cette méthode, 1822 sites d’éditions ont été identifiés dans l’ARN de cerveau de souris, incluant 28 nouveaux sites présents dans des séquences codantes qui conduisent à des mutations non-synonymes des futures protéines. Des sites d’éditions ont aussi été observés pour la première fois dans les ARN ribosomaux, les snoRNA et les snRNA

New insights in the clockwork mechanism regulating lineage specification: Lessons from the Drosophila nervous system

International audiencePowerful transcription factors called fate determinants induce robust differentiation programs in multipotent cells and trigger lineage specification. These factors guarantee the differentiation of specific tissues/organs/cells at the right place and the right moment to form a fully functional organism. Fate determinants are activated by temporal, positional, epigenetic, and post-transcriptional cues, hence integrating complex and dynamic developmental networks. In turn, they activate specific transcriptional/epigenetic programs that secure novel molecular landscapes

Revisiting the role of the Gcm transcription factor, from master regulator to Swiss army knife

International audienceMaster genes are known to induce the differentiation of a multipotent cell into a specific cell type. These molecules are often transcription factors that switch on the regulatory cascade that triggers cell specification. Gcm was first described as the master gene of the glial fate in Drosophila as it induces the differentiation of neuroblasts into glia in the developing nervous system. Later on, Gcm was also shown to regulate the differentiation of blood, tendon and peritracheal cells as well as that of neuronal subsets. Thus, the glial master gene is used in at least 4 additional systems to promote differentiation. To understand the numerous roles of Gcm, we recently reported a genome-wide screen of Gcm direct targets in the Drosophila embryo. This screen provided new insight into the role and mode of action of this powerful transcription factor, notably on the interactions between Gcm and major differentiation pathways such as the Hedgehog, Notch and JAK/STAT. Here, we discuss the mode of action of Gcm in the different systems, we present new tissues that require Gcm and we revise the concept of 'master gene'