Taxonomy, ecology, and relevance to food safety of the genus Listeria with a particular consideration of new Listeria species described between 2010 and 2022

ABSTRACTSince 2010, the genus Listeria has had the addition of 22 new species that more than tripled the number of species identified until 2010. Sixteen of these 22 new species are distantly related to the type species, Listeria monocytogenes, and several of these present phenotypes that distinguish them from classical Listeria species (L. monocytogenes, Listeria innocua, Listeria ivanovii, Listeria seeligeri, Listeria welshimeri, and Listeria grayi). These 22 newly described species also show that Listeria is more genetically diverse than previously estimated. While future studies and surveys are needed to clarify the distribution of these species, at least some of these species may not be widely spread, while other species may be frequently found spread to human-related settings (e.g., farms and processing facilities), and others may be adapted to specific environmental habitats. Here, we review the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and ecological characteristics of these new Listeria species identified since 2010 and re-iterate the suggestion of re-classification of some species into three new genera: Murraya, Mesolisteria, and Paenilisteria. We also provide a review of current detection issues and the relevance to food safety related to the identification of these new species. For example, several new non-pathogenic species could be misidentified as the pathogen L. monocytogenes, based on methods that do not target L. monocytogenes-specific virulence genes/factors, leading to unnecessary product recalls. Moreover, eight species in the proposed new genus Mesolisteria are not good indicators of environmental conditions that could allow L. monocytogenes to grow since Mesolisteria species are unable to grow at low temperatures

An Alternative Rapid Confirmation Method for Identifying Listeria monocytogenes from a Variety of 125 g Food Samples Within Two Days of a PCR Presumptive Positive

Cultural confirmation following detection of a Listeria monocytogenespresumptive positive can take 3–7 days to finalize; this uncertainty is a point of frustration for food producers needing to make time-sensitive disposition decisions. To address the demand for shortened time-to-results, an alternative L. monocytogenes confirmation method consisting of two components, (i) a secondary screen using a different rapid method, and (ii) concurrent cultural isolation followed by next-day colony identification was evaluated. For the study, four food matrices (hot dogs, peanut butter, frozen vegetables, and multicomponent frozen meals) were inoculated with low levels (0.36–1.39 MPN/125 g) of L. monocytogenes per the AOAC guidelines for a matrix study. Analyses were performed on 125 g test portions and started with a PCR primary screen (Bio-Rad iQ-Check Listeria monocytogenes II). Next, all enriched food samples underwent a secondary screen by bioMérieux’s GENE-UP LMO2 Real-Time PCR and VIDAS LMX ELFA along with streaking onto RAPID’L.mono Agar. Presumptive positive L. monocytogenes colonies were identified utilizing a high throughput rapid identification method (Hygiena’s BAX System L. monocytogenes Real-Time PCR assay, Neogen’s ANSR isothermal nucleic acid amplification assay, and Bruker’s MALDI Biotyper). Importantly, this study evaluated multiple commercially available options for the secondary screen (n = 2) and rapid identification (n = 3) to allow for easy adoption by testing laboratories. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between the number of L. monocytogenes-positive 125 g samples obtained by the cultural reference method and the alternative confirmation methods (regardless of which method combinations were evaluated). Additionally, this study supports that, when both the primary and secondary screen methods yield a positive result, the sample could be considered a confirmed positive for L. monocytogenes