45 research outputs found

    Monocytes are increased in pregnancy after gestational hypertensive disease.

    Get PDF
    Monocytes derive from bone marrow and circulate in the blood. They phagocytose, produce cytokines and present antigens. Individual monocyte subsets play distinct roles in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, but their implications in gestational hypertensive disease are unclear. Our objective was to examine the difference in monocyte subsets between pregnant women with or without previous hypertension in pregnancy. Women were enrolled in a prospective observational study in which monoclonal antibodies against cell surface receptors were used to detect monocytes in the peripheral blood by flow cytometry. We compared 17 pregnant women with previous hypertension in pregnancy (Group 1) and 42 pregnant women without previous gestational hypertensive disease (Group 2) with 27 healthy, non-pregnant controls (Group 3). The pregnant women were studied at 13 ± 1 weeks gestation. Monocyte subsets were quantified by flow cytometry: Mon1 (CD14++CD16-CCR2+), Mon2 (CD14++CD16+CCR2+), Mon3 (CD14+CD16+CCR2-), their aggregates with platelets and expression of the surface markers. The groups were well-matched for age, body mass index and ethnicity (P > 0.05 for all). Mon1 counts were higher in women with a history of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia compared to other groups (Group 1 = 441 per µl (376-512); Group 2 = 357 (309-457); Group 3 = 323 (277-397); P < 0.001). Mon3 was higher in both groups of pregnant women compared to non-pregnant controls (Group 1 = 51 (38-62); Group 2 = 38 (29-58); Group 3 = 26 (20-40), P = 0.002). Increased monocytes in women with a previous hypertensive pregnancy generates a hypothesis that these cells may link hypertension in pregnancy, chronic inflammation and future cardiovascular risk

    Echocardiographic structure and function in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy:a systematic review

    Get PDF
    Background— Echocardiography is commonly used to direct the management of hypertensive disorders in medical patients, but its application in pregnancy is unclear. Our objective was to define the use of echocardiography in pregnancies complicated by gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia. Methods and Results— We performed a systematic review of articles using an electronic search of databases from inception to March 2015, prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015015700). Eligible studies included pregnant women with GH or preeclampsia, evaluating left ventricular structure and function using echocardiography. The search strategy identified 36 studies, including 745 women with GH and 815 women with preeclampsia. The populations were heterogeneous with respect to clinical characteristics, parity, and risk of bias. Increased vascular resistance and left ventricular mass were the most consistent findings in GH and preeclampsia. Differentiating features from normal pregnancy were left ventricular wall thickness of ≥1.0 cm, exaggerated reduction in E/A, and lateral e′ of &lt;14 cm/s. There was disagreement between studies with regard to cardiac output because of the timing of echocardiography, although reduced stroke volume was an indicator of adverse prognosis. Diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular remodeling are most marked in severe and early-onset preeclampsia, but are also markers of preeclampsia before clinical manifestation, and are associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusions— Echocardiography is a valuable tool to stratify risk and can guide management and counseling in the preclinical and clinical phases of GH and preeclampsia. Changes in cardiac function and morphology are recognizable at an asymptomatic early stage and correlate with disease severity and adverse outcomes. </jats:sec

    Maternal mental health:a key area for future research among women with congenital heart disease

    Get PDF
    In this viewpoint, we respond to the recently published national priorities for research in congenital heart disease (CHD) among adults, established through the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership, with specific attention to priority 3 (mental health) and priority 5 (maternal health). Our recent policy impact project explored how maternal mental health is currently addressed in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) services in the National Health Service, identified gaps and discussed possible ways forward. Our multidisciplinary discussion groups, which included women with lived experience of CHD and pregnancy, cardiology and obstetrics clinicians and medical anthropologists, found that while pregnancy and the postnatal period increase the mental health challenges faced by women with CHD, current services are not yet equipped to address them. Based on this work, we welcome the prioritisation of both mental health and maternal health in ACHD, and suggest that future research should focus on the overlaps between these two priority areas
    corecore