Results of surgery in patients with bilateral independent temporal lobe spiking (BITLS) with normal MRI or bilateral mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) investigated with bilateral subdural grids

PURPOSE: The introduction of new technologies in the clinical practice have greatly decreased the number of patients submitted to invasive recordings. On the other hand, some patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy have normal MR scans or bilateral potentially epileptogenic lesions. This paper reports the results of invasive neurophysiology and surgical outcome in such patients. METHOD: Sixteen patients were studied. Eleven had normal MRI (Group I) and five had bilateral mesial temporal sclerosis (Group II). All patients had BITLS and non-localizatory seizures on video-EEG monitoring. All patients were implanted bilaterally with 32-contacts subdural grids. They were submitted to a cortico-amygdalo-total hippocampectomy at the side defined by chronic electrocorticography (ECoG). RESULTS: In Group I, seizures came from a single side in nine patients. In nine patients, seizures started at one side, spread to the ipsolateral contacts and contralaterally afterwards. On the other hand, in two Group I patients seizures started in one mesial region and spread to the contralateral parahippocampus and neocortex before spreading to ipsolateral contacts. All patients in Group II had seizures starting unilaterally with focal EcoG onset in the mesial regions. Eight Group I patients are seizure-free and three are in Engel's class II. Eighty percent of Group II patients are seizure-free after surgery and one patient is in Engel's class II. CONCLUSION: Good surgical results can be obtained in patients with BITLS. Patients with normal MRI seem to have a worse prognosis when compared to patients with unilateral or even bilateral MTS. Extensive subdural coverage is essential in patients with normal MRI

Long-term outcome after callosotomy or vagus nerve stimulation in consecutive prospective cohorts of children with Lennox–Gastaut or Lennox-like syndrome and non-specific MRI findings

AbstractPurposeThere is currently no resective (potentially curative) surgical option that is useful in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Palliative procedures such as callosotomy (Cx), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or deep brain stimulation have been offered. We compared the outcomes after Cx or VNS in two consecutive prospective cohorts of patients with generalised epilepsy.MethodsTwenty-four patients underwent callosotomy from 2006 to 2007 (Group 1); 20 additional patients were submitted to VNS from 2008 to 2009 (Group 2). They had generalised epilepsy of the Lennox–Gastaut or Lennox-like type. They were submitted to a neurological interview and examination, interictal and ictal video-EEG, high resolution 1.5T MRI, and cognitive and quality of life evaluations. The two-year post-operative follow-up results were evaluated for each patient.ResultsThe final mean stimuli intensity was 3.0mA in the Group 2 patients. Seizure-free patients accounted for 10% in Group 1 and none in Group 2. Ten and sixteen percent of the Group 1 and 2 patients, respectively, were non-responders. Improvements in attention and quality of life were noted in 85% of both Group 1 and 2 patients. Rupture of the secondary bilateral synchrony was noted in 85% of Group 1 patients; there was no EEG modification after VNS in Group 2. Both procedures were effective regarding the control of atypical absences and generalised tonic–clonic seizures. Both procedures were not effective in controlling tonic seizures. Callosotomy was very effective in reducing the frequency of atonic seizures, but VNS was ineffective. In contrast, callosotomy was not effective in reducing myoclonic seizures, whereas VNS was.DiscussionCallosotomy might be preferred as the primary treatment in children with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, and no specific findings on MRI if atonic seizures prevail in the patient's clinical picture; when myoclonic seizures prevail, the same might hold true in favour of VNS. When atypical absence or generalised tonic–clonic seizures are the main concern, although both procedures carry similar effectiveness, VNS might be considered a good option as an initial approach, taking into account the adverse event profile. Patients should be advised that both procedures are not very effective in the treatment of tonic seizures

Seizure's outcome after cortical resections including the face and tongue rolandic areas in patients with refractory epilepsy and normal MRI submitted to subdural grids' implantation

PURPOSE: To study the seizure's outcome in patients with refractory epilepsy and normal MRI submitted to resections including the rolandic cortex. METHODS: Four adult patients were studied. All patients had motor or somatosensory simple partial seizures and normal MRI and were submitted to subdural grids' implantation with extensive coverage of the cortical convexity (1 in the non-dominant and 3 in the dominant hemisphere). RESULTS: ECoG was able to define focal areas of seizures' onset in every patient. All patients were submitted to resection of the face and tongue motor and sensitive cortex; two patients had resections including the perirolandic cortex and 2 had additional cortical removals. Three patients are seizures' free and one had a greater then 90% reduction in seizure frequency. CONCLUSION: Resections including the face and tongue rolandic cortex can be safely performed even within the dominant hemisphere

Paradigms for subdural grids' implantation in patients with refractory epilepsy Paradigmas para implante de placas subdurais em pacientes com epilepsia refratária

RATIONALE: The need for invasive monitoring in patients with refractory epilepsy has been greatly reduced by the introduction of new technologies such as PET, SPECT and MRI in the clinical practice. On the other hand, 10 to 30% of the patients with refractory epilepsy have non-localizatory non-invasive preoperative work-up results. This paper reports on the paradigms for subdural electrodes implantation in patients with different refractory epileptic syndromes. METHODS: Twenty-nine adult refractory epileptic patients were studied. Patients were divided into five different epileptic syndromes that represented the majority of the patients who needed invasive recordings: bitemporal (Group I; n=16 ), bi-frontal-mesial (Group II, n=5), hemispheric (Group III; n=2), anterior quadrant (Group IV; n=3) and posterior quadrant (Group V; n=3). All of them were submitted to extensive subdural electrodes' implantation (from 64 to 160 contacts) covering all the cortical surface potentially involved in epileptogenesis under general anesthesia. Results: All patients tolerated well the procedure. There was no sign or symptom of intracranial hypertension except for headache in 22 patients. In all except one Group II patient, prolonged electrocorticographic monitoring using the described subdural cortical coverage patterns was able to define a focal area amenable for resection. In all Groups II-V patients cortical stimulation was able to adequately map the rolandic and speach areas as necessary. CONCLUSION: Despite recent technological advances invasive neurophysiological studies are still necessary in some patients with refractory epilepsy. The standardization of the paradigms for subdural implantation coupled to the study of homogeneous patients' populations as defined by MRI will certainly lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology involved in such cases and an improved surgical outcome.INTRODUÇÃO: O advento de novas tecnologias de imagem tais como o PET, SPECT e RM diminuíram em muito a necessidade da utilização de eletrodos invasivos na investigação pré-operatória de pacientes epilépticos. No entanto, 10 a 30% dos pacientes com epilepsias refratárias ainda possuem investigação não-invasiva inconclusiva. Este estudo relata nossos paradigmas para o implante de eletrodos subdurais nesta população de epilépticos refratários. MÉTODOS: Vinte e nove pacientes portadores de epilepsias refratárias foram estudados. Eles foram divididos em 5 grupos de síndromes epilépticas que incluíam a maioria dos pacientes submetidos a implantes: bitemporais (grupo I; n=16), bifrontomesiais (grupo II; n=5), hemisféricos (grupo III; n=2), quadrante anterior (grupo IV; n=3) e quadrante posterior (grupo V; n=3). Todos foram submetidos a extensos implantes subdurais (de 64 a 160 contatos) cobrindo todo o córtex potencialmente epileptogênico, sob anestesia geral. RESULTADOS: Todos pacientes toleraram bem o procedimento. Vinte e dois pacientes referiram cefaléia. Não houve outro sinal ou sintoma sugestivo de hipertensão intracraniana. Com exceção de um paciente do grupo II, a monitorização eletrocorticográfica crônica foi capaz de definir uma área focal própria para a ressecção cortical. A estimulação cortical foi capaz de mapear as áreas eloquentes necessárias em todos os pacientes dos grupos II a V. CONCLUSÃO: Alguns pacientes com epilepsia refratária ainda necessitam de avaliação invasiva apesar dos avanços nos métodos diagnósticos pré-operatórios. A padronização dos paradigmas para implante subdural destes pacientes bem como o estudo de populações homogêneas de pacientes definidas por RM levará a melhor compreensão da fisiopatologia envolvida nestes casos bem como a melhores resultados cirúrgicos