Myocardial Protection by Vagal Stimulation in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice

Introducción: Previamente se demostraron beneficios de la estimulación vagal (EV) prolongada en el infarto de miocardio. No obstante, se desconocen los efectos y los mecanismos de protección cuando se aplica en forma selectiva y brevemente antes de la isquemia o al inicio de la reperfusión. Objetivo: Estudiar si la EV en la reperfusión reduce el tamaño del infarto de manera similar a la EV preisquémica y si en ambas la protección está mediada por receptores muscarínicos o nicotínicos. Material y métodos: En ratones FVB se realizó una isquemia miocárdica regional de 30 minutos y 2 horas de reperfusión sin EV (I/R), con EV preisquémica por 10 minutos (EVp), con EV preisquémica y bloqueo muscarínico con atropina y con EV preisquémica y bloqueo nicotínico a-7 con metilicaconitina. También se estudiaron los efectos de la EV al inicio de la reperfusión (EVr), con atropina y con metilicaconitina. Se cateterizó el ventrículo izquierdo para medir la función ventricular. Se midió el área de riesgo con azul de Evans y el área de infarto con cloruro de 2,3,5-trifeniltetrazolio. Resultados: La EVr redujo el tamaño del infarto de forma similar a la EVp, aunque los mecanismos de protección fueron diferentes. La EVp protegió a través de la activación colinérgica de los receptores muscarínicos. La EVr, en cambio, protegió por una vía colinérgica nicotínica a-7. Conclusión: El presente estudio demuestra por primera vez en un modelo de isquemia y reperfusión miocárdica en ratones que una EV breve de 10 minutos es capaz de reducir de manera similar el tamaño del infarto, tanto cuando se aplica previo a la isquemia como en el inicio de la reperfusión, mimetizando de esta manera al precondicionamiento y al poscondicionamiento isquémicos, respectivamente.Background: The beneficial effects of prolonged vagal stimulation (VS) applied during myocardial infarction have been previously demonstrated. However, the effects and mechanisms of protection are unknown when VS is applied selectively and briefly before ischemia or at the onset of reperfusion. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze whether VS applied during reperfusion is capable of reducing infarct size similarly to preischemic VS, and whether in both cases muscarinic or nicotinic receptors mediate the protection. Methods: FVB mice were subjected to 30-minute regional myocardial ischemia and 2-hour reperfusion without VS (I/R); with 10 minutes preischemic VS (pVS), with pVS and muscarinic blockade by atropine and with pVS and a-7 nicotinic blockade by methyllycaconitine. The effects of VS at the onset of reperfusion (rVS) were also studied with atropine and with methyllycaconitine. A left ventricular catheter was used to measure ventricular function. Area at risk was measured using Evans blue and infarct size was assessed with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium. Results: Vagal stimulation during reperfusion reduced infarct size similarly to pVS, albeit with different mechanisms of protection. Preischemic VS protected the heart through cholinergic activation of muscarinic receptors, while rVS protection was effected through an a-7 cholinergic nicotinic pathway. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated for the first time in an ischemia-reperfusion mice model that a brief 10-minute period of VS is able to similarly reduce infarct size when it is applied prior to ischemia or at the onset of reperfusion, mimicking ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning, respectively.Fil: Kelly, Jazmín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad Medicina. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Departamento de Patología; ArgentinaFil: Buchholz, Bruno. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad Medicina. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Departamento de Patología; Argentina. Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología; ArgentinaFil: Bernatene, Eduardo Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad Medicina. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Departamento de Patología; ArgentinaFil: Méndez Diodati, Nahuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad Medicina. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Departamento de Patología; ArgentinaFil: Casanova, Veronica Cecilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Cicale, Eliana Magalí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Gelpi, Ricardo Jorge. Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad Medicina. Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular; Argentin

The importance of methodological detail and conceptual context when presenting laboratory animal science education tools: The authors’ reply

The Laboratory Animals Technologist degree was created in 1989 by the University of BuenosAires jointly between the Faculty of Veterinary Science and the Faculty of Pharmacy andBiochemistry.It has a structure formed by 15 subjects, and it is crossed, from beginning to end, by thesubjects "Técnicas de Bioterio I, II, III, IV y V". These subjects contain a high percentage ofpractical content, whose appropriation by the student will be of relevant importance for theirprofessional practice.From the beginning of the development of teaching tasks at the subjects previouslymentioned, the need to provide improvements in the dictation of these from the entire teamthat conforms the chair has been felt. From its beginning, one of the critical points of thesesubjects has been the evaluation ways and the criteria differences among the teachers.The functions of evaluation answer the why of the evaluation. That is why it is so important todefine a conception of evaluation in each instance, which allows us, based on the agreements,to redefine why evaluation is done.It has been assigned multiple functions to it. The most critical consequence of this multiplicityhas been the confusion between them, sometimes at the theoretical level, considering that ithas a function of control and surveillance of learning and the subjects in the operational order.In this context, it ceases to fulfill its real role as an accompaniment to the instructive processand is dedicated to being the force that tries to equalize and repress.Fil: Cicale, Eliana Magalí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Casanova, Veronica Cecilia. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Caturini, Eduardo Daniel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Ceol Retamal, Marianela Noemí. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof. Eduardo de Robertis". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia; ArgentinaFil: Greco, María Carla. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Gimenez, Sofía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Gulin, Julián Ernesto Nicolás. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Cátedra de Histología y Embriologías; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentin

Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients on dialysis: a multicentre cohort study in Italy

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients undergoing haemodialysis in Italy compared to the general population.Methods In this cohort study, 118 dialysis centres from 18 Italian Regions participated. Individuals older than 16 years on dialysis treatment for at least 3 months, who provided informed consent were included. We collected demographic and clinical information, as well as data on vaccination status, hospitalisations, access to intensive care units and adverse events. We calculated the incidence, hospitalisation, mortality, and fatality rates in the vaccinated dialysis cohort, adjusted for several covariates. The incidence rates of infection in the dialysis cohort and the general population were compared through Standardised Incidence Rate Ratio.Results The study included 6555 patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 infection according to the schedule recommended in Italy. Between March 2021 and May 2022, there were 1096 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with an incidence rate after completion of the three-dose vaccination cycle of 37.7 cases per 100 person-years. Compared to the general population, we observed a 14% reduction in the risk of infection for patients who received three vaccine doses (Standardised Incidence Rate Ratio: 0.86; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.81-0.91), whereas no statistically significant differences were found for COVID-19-related hospitalisations, intensive care unit admissions or death. No safety signals emerged from the reported adverse events.Conclusions The vaccination program against SARS-CoV-2 in the haemodialysis population showed an effectiveness and safety profile comparable to that seen in the general population

Effects of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery: an international prospective cohort study an international prospective cohort study

We aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We performed an international prospective cohort study including patients undergoing elective surgery in October 2020. Isolation was defined as the period before surgery during which patients did not leave their house or receive visitors from outside their household. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, adjusted in multivariable models for measured confounders. Pre-defined sub-group analyses were performed for the primary outcome. A total of 96,454 patients from 114 countries were included and overall, 26,948 (27.9%) patients isolated before surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded in 1947 (2.0%) patients of which 227 (11.7%) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients who isolated pre-operatively were older, had more respiratory comorbidities and were more commonly from areas of high SARS-CoV-2 incidence and high-income countries. Although the overall rates of postoperative pulmonary complications were similar in those that isolated and those that did not (2.1% vs 2.0%, respectively), isolation was associated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses revealed no further differences when patients were categorised by: pre-operative testing; use of COVID-19-free pathways; or community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications increased with periods of isolation longer than 3 days, with an OR (95%CI) at 4–7 days or ≥ 8 days of 1.25 (1.04–1.48), p = 0.015 and 1.31 (1.11–1.55), p = 0.001, respectively. Isolation before elective surgery might be associated with a small but clinically important increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Longer periods of isolation showed no reduction in the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These findings have significant implications for global provision of elective surgical care. We aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We performed an international prospective cohort study including patients undergoing elective surgery in October 2020. Isolation was defined as the period before surgery during which patients did not leave their house or receive visitors from outside their household. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, adjusted in multivariable models for measured confounders. Pre-defined sub-group analyses were performed for the primary outcome. A total of 96,454 patients from 114 countries were included and overall, 26,948 (27.9%) patients isolated before surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded in 1947 (2.0%) patients of which 227 (11.7%) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients who isolated pre-operatively were older, had more respiratory comorbidities and were more commonly from areas of high SARS-CoV-2 incidence and high-income countries. Although the overall rates of postoperative pulmonary complications were similar in those that isolated and those that did not (2.1% vs 2.0%, respectively), isolation was associated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses revealed no further differences when patients were categorised by: pre-operative testing; use of COVID-19-free pathways; or community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications increased with periods of isolation longer than 3 days, with an OR (95%CI) at 4–7 days or ≥ 8 days of 1.25 (1.04–1.48), p = 0.015 and 1.31 (1.11–1.55), p = 0.001, respectively. Isolation before elective surgery might be associated with a small but clinically important increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Longer periods of isolation showed no reduction in the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These findings have significant implications for global provision of elective surgical care

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Analysis of Outcomes in Ischemic vs Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation A Report From the GARFIELD-AF Registry

IMPORTANCE Congestive heart failure (CHF) is commonly associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and their combination may affect treatment strategies and outcomes