1,442 research outputs found

    Gendering the Second Amendment

    Get PDF

    The important relationship between socioeconomic decline, masculinity, and guns

    Get PDF
    Recent events have reopened the debate over the role of guns in U.S. society, at a time when many states are expanding gun laws through open and concealed carry measures. How can we account for the popularity of guns in America, especially among men? Jennifer Carlson investigated this question by interviewing, and spending time with, gun-owning men in Michigan. She found that for these men, protecting their family and community was an important part of their gun ownership, a role which is has become even more important in light of their decline as breadwinners in a difficult economic climate

    Electrical Stimulation for Post-CVA Individuals

    Get PDF

    Beyond Law and Order in the Gun Debate: Black Lives Matter, Abolitionism, and Anti-Racist Gun Policy

    Get PDF
    In 2020, millions of Americans mobilized for racial justice and police accountability under the banner of the Black Lives Matter movement. The diverse range of their demands notwithstanding, activists overwhelmingly called for the decentering (if not also defunding) of police as the go-to institution for solving problems of crime, broadly reflecting the anti-racist politics embraced by the contemporary criminal justice abolition movement. Recognizing that American gun policy has often deepened the reach of the criminal justice system amid the war on crime's broad ambit, this article considers how abolitionist approaches -- and the broader scholar-activist work in which they are embedded -- challenge the traditional coordinates of gun politics and gun policy and provide a framework for forging an anti-racist gun politics. Putting criminal justice abolitionism into conversation with existing community-led efforts that decenter the criminal justice apparatus in gun violence prevention, this essay examines gun abolitionism as a means of revamping dominant visions of safety and justice from an anti-racist perspective -- and reformulating the leading approaches to gun policy accordingly

    Relative Sensitivities of Diatoms to Selected Heavy Metals

    Get PDF
    Baseline data, including diatom community structure, metal concentrations of water, sediments and periphyton of the Embarras River were determined previously (Vaultonburg, 1991). Data on diatom community structure in conjunction with efforts to identify relative sensitivity of diatoms may be useful in establishing an effective method for biomonitoring metal pollution in the Embarras River and other aquatic systems. The main objectives of this project were: i) develop a bioassay method; ii) evaluate relative toxicities of several metals towards diatoms; and, iii) evaluate relative sensitivities of diatoms toward dissolved metals. Unialgal cultures of Cyclotella meneghiniana, Navicula vaucheriae, and Nitzschia palea were isolated from Embarras River water and associated substrata (e.g. mud, stones, twigs). Standard 14-day, non-renewal bioassay procedures were used to investigate the effects of various concentrations of Al, Cu, Ni, and Zn on diatom population growth and survival. Copper was found to be the most toxic metal to all three diatoms with EC50 values of 5-10 ÎĽM. Nickel EC50 values were 18 ÎĽM for N. palea, and 10-12.5 ÎĽM for C. meneghiniana and N. vaucheriae. Zinc was found to be less toxic than Ni with an EC50 of 17 ÎĽM for C. meneghiniana and 50-100 ÎĽM for N. vaucheriae and N. palea. Aluminum was the least toxic to all diatoms with EC50 values of 150 ÎĽM for C. meneghiniana, 360 ÎĽM for N. vaucheriae and 500-1000 ÎĽM for N. palea. All three species appear to be equally sensitive to Cu. Cyclotella meneghiniana was found to be the most sensitive to Al and Zn. Both C. meneghiniana and N. vaucheriae were more sensitive to Ni than was N. palea

    Relative Sensitivities of Diatoms to Selected Heavy Metals

    Get PDF
    Baseline data, including diatom community structure, metal concentrations of water, sediments and periphyton of the Embarras River were determined previously (Vaultonburg, 1991). Data on diatom community structure in conjunction with efforts to identify relative sensitivity of diatoms may be useful in establishing an effective method for biomonitoring metal pollution in the Embarras River and other aquatic systems. The main objectives of this project were: i) develop a bioassay method; ii) evaluate relative toxicities of several metals towards diatoms; and, iii) evaluate relative sensitivities of diatoms toward dissolved metals. Unialgal cultures of Cyclotella meneghiniana, Navicula vaucheriae, and Nitzschia palea were isolated from Embarras River water and associated substrata (e.g. mud, stones, twigs). Standard 14-day, non-renewal bioassay procedures were used to investigate the effects of various concentrations of Al, Cu, Ni, and Zn on diatom population growth and survival. Copper was found to be the most toxic metal to all three diatoms with EC50 values of 5-10 ÎĽM. Nickel EC50 values were 18 ÎĽM for N. palea, and 10-12.5 ÎĽM for C. meneghiniana and N. vaucheriae. Zinc was found to be less toxic than Ni with an EC50 of 17 ÎĽM for C. meneghiniana and 50-100 ÎĽM for N. vaucheriae and N. palea. Aluminum was the least toxic to all diatoms with EC50 values of 150 ÎĽM for C. meneghiniana, 360 ÎĽM for N. vaucheriae and 500-1000 ÎĽM for N. palea. All three species appear to be equally sensitive to Cu. Cyclotella meneghiniana was found to be the most sensitive to Al and Zn. Both C. meneghiniana and N. vaucheriae were more sensitive to Ni than was N. palea

    Breaking the Barriers to Specialty Care: Practical Ideas to Improve Health Equity and Reduce Cost - Ensuring High-Quality Specialty Care

    Get PDF
    Tremendous health outcome inequities remain in the U.S. across race and ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation, socio-economic status, and geography—particularly for those with serious conditions such as lung or skin cancer, HIV/AIDS, or cardiovascular disease.These inequities are driven by a complex set of factors—including distance to a specialist, insurance coverage, provider bias, and a patient's housing and healthy food access. These inequities not only harm patients, resulting in avoidable illness and death, they also drive unnecessary health systems costs.This 5-part series highlights the urgent need to address these issues, providing resources such as case studies, data, and recommendations to help the health care sector make meaningful strides toward achieving equity in specialty care.Top TakeawaysThere are vast inequalities in access to and outcomes from specialty health care in the U.S. These inequalities are worst for minority patients, low-income patients, patients with limited English language proficiency, and patients in rural areas.A number of solutions have emerged to improve health outcomes for minority and medically underserved patients. These solutions fall into three main categories: increasing specialty care availability, ensuring high-quality care, and helping patients engage in care.As these inequities are also significant drivers of health costs, payers, health care provider organizations, and policy makers have a strong incentive to invest in solutions that will both improve outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs. These actors play a critical role in ensuring that equity is embedded into core care delivery at scale.Part 3: "Ensuring High-Quality Specialty Care"New efforts to mitigate provider implicit bias, establish culturally-competent care, and leverage quality improvement approaches help identify and eliminate disparities in care
    • …
    corecore