41,041 research outputs found
Disambiguating Different Covariation Types
Covariations in neuronal latency or excitability can lead to peaks in spike train covariograms that may be very similar to those caused by spike timing synchronization (see companion article). Two quantitative methods are described here. The first is a method to estimate the excitability component of a covariogram, based on trial-by-trial estimates of excitability. Once estimated, this component may be subtracted from the covariogram, leaving only other types of contributions. The other is a method to determine whether the covariogram could potentially have been caused by latency covariations
Recommended from our members
Desmognathus folkertsi
Number of Pages: 3Integrative BiologyGeological Science
Correlations Without Synchrony
Peaks in spike train correlograms are usually taken as indicative of spike timing synchronization between neurons. Strictly speaking, however, a peak merely indicates that the two spike trains were not independent. Two biologically plausible ways of departing from independence that are capable of generating peaks very similar to spike timing peaks are described here: covariations over trials in response latency and covariations over trials in neuronal excitability. Since peaks due to these interactions can be similar to spike timing peaks, interpreting a correlogram may be a problem with ambiguous solutions. What peak shapes do latency or excitability interactions generate? When are they similar to spike timing peaks? When can they be ruled out from having caused an observed correlogram peak? These are the questions addressed here. The previous article in this issue proposes quantitative methods to tell cases apart when latency or excitability covariations cannot be ruled out
Supersymmetry and Bosonization in Three Dimensions
We discuss on the possible existence of a supersymmetric invariance in purely
fermionic planar systems and its relation to the fermion-boson mapping in
three-dimensional quantum field theory. We consider, as a very simple example,
the bosonization of free massive fermions and show that, under certain
conditions on the masses, this model displays a supersymmetric-like invariance
in the low energy regime. We construct the purely fermionic expression for the
supercurrent and the non-linear supersymmetry transformation laws. We argue
that the supersymmetry is absent in the limit of massless fermions where the
bosonized theory is non-local.Comment: 12 pages, LaTeX, no figures, to appear in Physics Letters
D6 branes and M theory geometrical transitions from gauged supergravity
We study the supergravity duals of supersymmetric theories arising in the
world-volume of D6 branes wrapping holomorphic two-cycles and special
Lagrangian three-cycles within the framework of eight dimensional gauged
supergravity. When uplifted to 11d, our solutions represent M-theory on the
background of, respectively, the small resolution of the conifold and a
manifold with G_2 holonomy. We further discuss on the flop and other possible
geometrical transitions and its implications.Comment: 16 pages, harvmac, one figure; references adde
Center of Mass and spin for isolated sources of gravitational radiation
We define the center of mass and spin of an isolated system in General
Relativity. The resulting relationships between these variables and the total
linear and angular momentum of the gravitational system are remarkably similar
to their Newtonian counterparts, though only variables at the null boundary of
an asymptotically flat spacetime are used for their definition. We also derive
equations of motion linking their time evolution to the emitted gravitational
radiation. The results are then compared to other approaches. In particular one
obtains unexpected similarities as well as some differences with results
obtained in the Post Newtonian literature . These equations of motion should be
useful when describing the radiation emitted by compact sources such as
coalescing binaries capable of producing gravitational kicks, supernovas, or
scattering of compact objects.Comment: 16 pages. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev.
- âŠ