A 2-Step Approach to Myeloablative Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with Optimized T-Cell Dosing: Early Immune Reconstitution Leads to Better Outcomes

We developed a 2-step approach to myeloablative haploidentical HSCT in which patients receive a large fixed dose of cyclophosphamide (CY)-tolerized T cells separately frm the HSC infusion in the hopes of accelerating post HSCT immune reconstitution (IR). The uniformity of the T cell dosing facilitates comparison of patients without (low risk) and with (high risk) active malignancy at HSCT to ascertain the impact of disease status at HSCT on IR with fewer confounding effects from conditioning or T cell dosing

A 2-step approach to myeloablative haploidentical stem cell transplantation: a phase 1/2 trial performed with optimized T-cell dosing.

Studies of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have identified threshold doses of T cells below which severe GVHD is usually absent. However, little is known regarding optimal T-cell dosing as it relates to engraftment, immune reconstitution, and relapse. To begin to address this question, we developed a 2-step myeloablative approach to haploidentical HSCT in which 27 patients conditioned with total body irradiation (TBI) were given a fixed dose of donor T cells (HSCT step 1), followed by cyclophosphamide (CY) for T-cell tolerization. A CD34-selected HSC product (HSCT step 2) was infused after CY. A dose of 2 × 10(8)/kg of T cells resulted in consistent engraftment, immune reconstitution, and acceptable rates of GVHD. Cumulative incidences of grade III-IV GVHD, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse-related mortality were 7.4%, 22.2%, and 29.6%, respectively. With a follow-up of 28-56 months, the 3-year probability of overall survival for the whole cohort is 48% and 75% in patients without disease at HSCT. In the context of CY tolerization, a high, fixed dose of haploidentical T cells was associated with encouraging outcomes, especially in good-risk patients, and can serve as the basis for further exploration and optimization of this 2-step approach. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00429143

A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus with 7&3 Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for younger AML patients, though many relapse. Data from our group have shown that highly phosphorylated S6 in blasts may predict response to sirolimus given with chemotherapy. We report the results of a phase I study of this combination in newly diagnosed AML and the pharmacodynamic analysis of pS6 before and after treatment. Subjects received sirolimus (12 mg on day 1, 4 mg daily, days 2-10), then idarubicin and cytarabine (days 4-10). Response was assessed at hematologic recovery or by day 42 using a modified IWG criteria. Fifty-five patients received sirolimus. Toxicity was similar to published 7 + 3 data, and 53% had high-, 27% intermediate-, and 20% favorable-risk disease. Forty-four percent of the high-risk patients entered into CR/CRp. Seventy-nine percent of the intermediate-risk subjects had a CR/CRp. All favorable-risk patients had a CR by day 42; 9/11 remained alive and in remission with a median follow-up of 660 days. Additionally, 41/55 patients had adequate samples for pharmacodynamic analysis. All patients demonstrated activation of S6 prior to therapy, in contrast to 67% seen in previous studies of relapsed AML. mTORC1 inhibition was observed in 66% of patients without enrichment among patients who achieved remission. We conclude that sirolimus and 7 + 3 is a well-tolerated and safe regimen. mTORC1 appears to be activated in almost all patients at diagnosis of AML. Inhibition of mTORC1 did not differ based on response, suggesting that AML cells may have redundant signaling pathways that regulate chemosensitivity in the presence of mTORC1 inhibition

Improved survival after acute graft-

A cute graft- versus -host disease remains a major threat to a successful outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. While improvements in treatment and supportive care have occurred, it is unknown whether these advances have resulted in improved outcome specifically among those diagnosed with acute graft- versus -host disease. We examined outcome following diagnosis of grade II-IV acute graft- versus -host disease according to time period, and explored effects according to original graft- versus -host disease prophylaxis regimen and maximum overall grade of acute graft- versus -host disease. Between 1999 and 2012, 2,905 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (56%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (30%) or myelodysplastic syndromes (14%) received a sibling (24%) or unrelated donor (76%) blood (66%) or marrow (34%) transplant and developed grade II-IV acute graft- versus -host disease (n=497 for 1999-2001, n=962 for 2002-2005, n=1,446 for 2006-2010). The median (range) follow-up was 144 (4-174), 97 (4-147) and 60 (8-99) months for 1999-2001, 2002-2005, and 2006-2010, respectively. Among the cohort with grade II-IV acute graft- versus -host disease, there was a decrease in the proportion of grade III-IV disease over time with 56%, 47%, and 37% for 1999-2001, 2002-2005, and 2006-2012, respectively ( P <0.001). Considering the total study population, univariate analysis demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival and treatment-related mortality over time, and deaths from organ failure and infection declined. On multivariate analysis, significant improvements in overall survival ( P =0.003) and treatment-related mortality ( P =0.008) were only noted among those originally treated with tacrolimus-based graft- versus -host disease prophylaxis, and these effects were most apparent among those with overall grade II acute graft- versus -host disease. In conclusion, survival has improved over time for tacrolimus-treated transplant recipients with acute graft- versus -host disease