Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation

Purpose Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-ri) is a rare potentially reversible encephalopathy associated with an autoimmune process against proteins deposited in the walls of cortical and leptomeningeal brain vessels. Definite diagnosis requires histopathological features of vascular inflammation and amyloid deposition from brain biopsy. Clinical-neuroradiological criteria have been recently introduced and validated to reduce the need for biopsy. The purpose of this paper is to report a historical retrospective review of clinical-neuroradiological follow-up of two patients with probable CAA-ri and five patients with a reasonably probable suspect of CAA-ri (4 females, 3 males, patient's age at admission: 66-79 years) seen at our institution between 2007 and 2021, focusing on clinical and neuroradiological awareness to this entity and variable response to immunotherapy. Materials and methods Clinical features at presentation included subacute to acute confusion (6/7), seizures (4/7), cognitive impairment (5/7), and focal neurological signs (3/7). Neuroradiology included braincomputed tomography followed by magnetic resonance imaging. Infectious diseases and autoimmune workups were then performed. Results CSF analysis was performed in two patients. Cerebral angiography was performed in two patients, to rule out vascular malformations. Hemorrhagic posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome has been suspected in two patients. Four patients underwent immunotherapy with corticosteroids followed by reduction of brain dysfunctions. Three patients did not undergo immunotherapy but underwent clinical and/or neuroradiological remission. Conclusions Patients with CAA-ri present a rare steroid-responsive acute to subacute brain dysfunction. Thus, it has to be known and recognized both clinically and neuroradiologically. Spontaneous clinical and/or neuroradiological improvement is possible in patients with mild symptoms

Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants alone or in combination with anti-platelet therapy

Introduction: Ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at high risk of stroke recurrence despite oral anticoagulation therapy. Patients with cardiovascular comorbidities may take both antiplatelet and oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC/AP). Our study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OAC/AP therapy as secondary prevention in people with AF and ischaemic stroke. Patients and methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of pooled individual data from multicenter prospective cohort studies and compared outcomes in the OAC/AP cohort and patients on DOAC/VKA anticoagulation alone (OAC cohort). Primary outcome was a composite of ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, intracranial bleeding, and major extracranial bleeding, while secondary outcomes were ischaemic and haemorrhagic events considered separately. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for outcome events. To compare the risk of outcome events between the two cohorts, the relation between the survival function and the set of explanatory variables were calculated by Cox proportional hazard models and the results were reported as adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Finally another analysis was performed to compare the overall risk of outcome events in both OAC/AP and OAC cohorts after propensity score matching (PSM). Results: During a mean follow-up time of 7.5 ± 9.1 months (median follow-up time 3.5 months, interquartile range ±3), 2284 stroke patients were on oral anticoagulants and 215 were on combined therapy. The multivariable model demonstrated that the composite outcome is associated with age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04 for each year increase) and concomitant antiplatelet therapy (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.48-3.27), the ischaemic outcome with congestive heart failure (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.02-2.36) and concomitant antiplatelet therapy (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.19-3.13) and the haemorrhagic outcome with age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06 for each year increase), alcoholism (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.06-4.39) and concomitant antiplatelet therapy (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.23-4.02). Cox regression demonstrated a higher rate of the composite outcome (hazard ratio of 1.93 [95% CI, 1.35-2.76]), ischaemic events (HR: 2.05 [95% CI: 1.45-2.87]) and bleeding outcomes (HR: 1.90 [95% CI, 1.06-3.40]) in OAC/AP cohort. After PSM analysis, the composite outcome remained more frequent in people treated with OAC + AP (RR: 1.70 [95% CI, 1.05-2.74]). Discussion: Secondary prevention with combination of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy after ischaemic stroke was associated with worse outcomes in our cohort. Conclusion: Further research is needed to improve secondary prevention by investigating the mechanisms of recurrent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation