2 research outputs found
Reciprocal relativity of noninertial frames: quantum mechanics
Noninertial transformations on time-position-momentum-energy space {t,q,p,e}
with invariant Born-Green metric ds^2=-dt^2+dq^2/c^2+(1/b^2)(dp^2-de^2/c^2) and
the symplectic metric -de/\dt+dp/\dq are studied. This U(1,3) group of
transformations contains the Lorentz group as the inertial special case. In the
limit of small forces and velocities, it reduces to the expected Hamilton
transformations leaving invariant the symplectic metric and the nonrelativistic
line element ds^2=dt^2. The U(1,3) transformations bound relative velocities by
c and relative forces by b. Spacetime is no longer an invariant subspace but is
relative to noninertial observer frames. Born was lead to the metric by a
concept of reciprocity between position and momentum degrees of freedom and for
this reason we call this reciprocal relativity.
For large b, such effects will almost certainly only manifest in a quantum
regime. Wigner showed that special relativistic quantum mechanics follows from
the projective representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. Projective
representations of a Lie group are equivalent to the unitary reprentations of
its central extension. The same method of projective representations of the
inhomogeneous U(1,3) group is used to define the quantum theory in the
noninertial case. The central extension of the inhomogeneous U(1,3) group is
the cover of the quaplectic group Q(1,3)=U(1,3)*s H(4). H(4) is the
Weyl-Heisenberg group. A set of second order wave equations results from the
representations of the Casimir operators
Representations of the Canonical group, (the semi-direct product of the Unitary and Weyl-Heisenberg groups), acting as a dynamical group on noncommuting extended phase space
The unitary irreducible representations of the covering group of the Poincare
group P define the framework for much of particle physics on the physical
Minkowski space P/L, where L is the Lorentz group. While extraordinarily
successful, it does not provide a large enough group of symmetries to encompass
observed particles with a SU(3) classification. Born proposed the reciprocity
principle that states physics must be invariant under the reciprocity transform
that is heuristically {t,e,q,p}->{t,e,p,-q} where {t,e,q,p} are the time,
energy, position, and momentum degrees of freedom. This implies that there is
reciprocally conjugate relativity principle such that the rates of change of
momentum must be bounded by b, where b is a universal constant. The appropriate
group of dynamical symmetries that embodies this is the Canonical group C(1,3)
= U(1,3) *s H(1,3) and in this theory the non-commuting space Q= C(1,3)/
SU(1,3) is the physical quantum space endowed with a metric that is the second
Casimir invariant of the Canonical group, T^2 + E^2 - Q^2/c^2-P^2/b^2 +(2h
I/bc)(Y/bc -2) where {T,E,Q,P,I,Y} are the generators of the algebra of
Os(1,3). The idea is to study the representations of the Canonical dynamical
group using Mackey's theory to determine whether the representations can
encompass the spectrum of particle states. The unitary irreducible
representations of the Canonical group contain a direct product term that is a
representation of U(1,3) that Kalman has studied as a dynamical group for
hadrons. The U(1,3) representations contain discrete series that may be
decomposed into infinite ladders where the rungs are representations of U(3)
(finite dimensional) or C(2) (with degenerate U(1)* SU(2) finite dimensional
representations) corresponding to the rest or null frames.Comment: 25 pages; V2.3, PDF (Mathematica 4.1 source removed due to technical
problems); Submitted to J.Phys.