Beyond GDP and Back: What is the Value-Added by Additional Components of Welfare Measurement?

Recently, building on the highly polarizing Stiglitz report, a growing literature suggests that statistical offices and applied researchers explore other aspects of human welfare apart from material well-being, such as job security, crime, health, environmental factors and subjective perceptions. To explore the additional information of these indicators, we analyze data on the macro level from the German Federal Statistical Office combined with micro level data from the German SOEP (1991-2008) on the personal work situation and subjective feelings concerning several aspects of life. Employing the indicators suggested by the Stiglitz Report, we find that much of the variation in many well-being measures can indeed be captured well by the hard economic indicators as used in the literature, especially by GDP and the unemployment rate. This suggests that the hard indicators are still a reasonable and quite robust gauge of well-being of a country. And yet, we also see that these correlations are far from perfect, thus giving considerable hope that there is room for a broader statistical reporting

You Don‘t Know What You‘ve Got Till It‘s Gone! Unemployment and Intertemporal Changes in Self-Reported Life Satisfaction

This paper uses concurrently and - for the first time - retrospectively reported life satisfaction from the 1984 to 1987 waves of the German Socio-Economic Panel to study the importance of different comparison standards for the empirical correlation of unemployment and subjective life satisfaction. It is found that unemployed individuals do not only report significantly lower concurrent satisfaction, but also recall reduced satisfaction from past unemployment well, and retrospectively upgrade their past satisfaction scores. Therefore, the short-term negative effects of unemployment on individual life satisfaction reported in the literature so far are likely underestimated. At the same time, the empirical findings cast doubts on the usefulness of subjective life satisfaction for the precise quantification of welfare effects because of changing comparison standards which greatly limit the intertemporal comparability of the data. For this reason, such data also appear to be of limited use for monitoring long-term economic or social development.Diese Studie untersucht den Einfluss verschiedener Vergleichsstandards auf die empirische Korrelation von Arbeitslosigkeit und individueller Lebenszufriedenheit. Dafür werden sowohl longitudinale als auch retrospektive Daten zur subjektiven Lebenszufriedenheit des Deutschen Sozio-ökonomischen Panels aus den Jahren 1984 bis 1987 ausgewertet. Es wird gezeigt, dass Arbeitslose nicht nur zum Zeitpunkt ihrer Arbeitslosigkeit eine geringere Lebenszufriedenheit angeben, sondern sich später auch gut an diese geringere Zufriedenheit erinnern und retrospektiv frühere Angaben zur Lebenszufriedenheit nach oben korrigieren. Die bisher in der Literatur genannten kurzfristigen negativen Effekte von Arbeitslosigkeit auf das individuelle Wohlergehen sind daher wahrscheinlich unterschätzt worden. Allerdings deuten die empirischen Ergebnisse dieser Studie auch darauf hin, dass Daten zur subjektiven Lebenszufriedenheit nur sehr bedingt dazu geeignet sind, Wohlfahrtseffekte zu quantifizieren, da sich die individuellen Evaluationsstandards im Zeitablauf ändern. Aus diesem Grund erscheinen solche Daten auch ungeeignet, um längerfristige sozio-ökonomische Entwicklungen zu beobachten oder zu analysieren