Early versus late start of direct oral anticoagulants after acute ischaemic stroke linked to atrial fibrillation: an observational study and individual patient data pooled analysis

OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing to start direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after an acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) related to atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We aimed to compare early (≤5 days of AIS) versus late (>5 days of AIS) DOAC-start. METHODS: This is an individual patient data pooled analysis of eight prospective European and Japanese cohort studies. We included patients with AIS related to non-valvular AF where a DOAC was started within 30 days. Primary endpoints were 30-day rates of recurrent AIS and ICH. RESULTS: A total of 2550 patients were included. DOACs were started early in 1362 (53%) patients, late in 1188 (47%). During 212 patient-years, 37 patients had a recurrent AIS (1.5%), 16 (43%) before a DOAC was started; 6 patients (0.2%) had an ICH, all after DOAC-start. In the early DOAC-start group, 23 patients (1.7%) suffered from a recurrent AIS, while 2 patients (0.1%) had an ICH. In the late DOAC-start group, 14 patients (1.2%) suffered from a recurrent AIS; 4 patients (0.3%) suffered from ICH. In the propensity score-adjusted comparison of late versus early DOAC-start groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the hazard of recurrent AIS (aHR=1.2, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.9, p=0.69), ICH (aHR=6.0, 95% CI 0.6 to 56.3, p=0.12) or any stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not corroborate concerns that an early DOAC-start might excessively increase the risk of ICH. The sevenfold higher risk of recurrent AIS than ICH suggests that an early DOAC-start might be reasonable, supporting enrolment into randomised trials comparing an early versus late DOAC-start

Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry

Recent case-series of small size implied a pathophysiological association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe large-vessel acute ischemic stroke. Given that severe strokes are typically associated with poor prognosis and can be very efficiently treated with recanalization techniques, confirmation of this putative association is urgently warranted in a large representative patient cohort to alert stroke clinicians, and inform pre- and in-hospital acute stroke patient pathways. We pooled all consecutive patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and acute ischemic stroke in 28 sites from 16 countries. To assess whether stroke severity and outcomes (assessed at discharge or at the latest assessment for those patients still hospitalized) in patients with acute ischemic stroke are different between patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching analyses of our COVID-19 patients with non-COVID-19 patients registered in the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne Registry between 2003 and 2019. Between January 27, 2020, and May 19, 2020, 174 patients (median age 71.2 years; 37.9% females) with COVID-19 and acute ischemic stroke were hospitalized (median of 12 patients per site). The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-18). In the 1:1 matched sample of 336 patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was higher in patients with COVID-19 (10 [IQR, 4-18] versus 6 [IQR, 3-14]), P=0.03; (odds ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.08-2.65] for higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score). There were 48 (27.6%) deaths, of which 22 were attributed to COVID-19 and 26 to stroke. Among 96 survivors with available information about disability status, 49 (51%) had severe disability at discharge. In the propensity score-matched population (n=330), patients with COVID-19 had higher risk for severe disability (median mRS 4 [IQR, 2-6] versus 2 [IQR, 1-4], P<0.001) and death (odds ratio, 4.3 [95% CI, 2.22-8.30]) compared with patients without COVID-19. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 associated ischemic strokes are more severe with worse functional outcome and higher mortality than non-COVID-19 ischemic strokes

Tumefactive demyelinating lesions during etanercept treatment requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune disorders. Etanercept, a TNF-α antagonist (anti-TNF-α) acting as a soluble TNF-α receptor, has been associated with neurological demyelinating disorders. This paper aims to report an unusual case showing tumefactive central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory demyelination in a patient in the course of TNF -α antagonist therapy, requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy. This report is based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and histology. A biopsy confirmed the inflammatory demyelinating nature of the lesions. The clinical presentation is unusual due to the severity of the disease process, requiring decompressive hemicraniotomy with a clinically favorable outcome

SAS Care 1: sleep-disordered breathing in acute stroke and transient ischaemic attack - prevalence, evolution and association with functional outcome at 3 months, a prospective observational polysomnography study

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is frequent in patients with acute stroke. Little is known, however about the evolution of SDB after stroke. Most of our knowledge stems from smaller cohort studies applying limited cardiopulmonary sleep recordings or from cross-sectional data collected in different populations.This study aims to determine prevalence, type and intra-individual evolution of SDB based on full-night polysomnography (PSG) in acute stroke and 3 months thereafter. Furthermore, we aimed to identify predictors of SDB in the acute and chronic phase and to evaluate associations between SDB and functional outcome at 3 months (M3).A total of 166 patients with acute cerebrovascular events were evaluated by full PSG at baseline and 105 again at M3. The baseline prevalence of SDB (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI)&gt;5.h(-1)) was 80.5% and 25.4% of the patients had severe SDB (AHI&gt;30.h(-1)). Obstructive sleep apnoea was more prevalent than central sleep apnoea (83.8% versus 13%). Mean +/- SD AHI was 21.4 +/- 17.6.h(-1) and decreased significantly at M3 (18 +/- 16.4.h(-1); p=0.018). At M3, 91% of all patients with baseline SDB still had an AHI&gt;5.h(-1) and in 68.1% the predominant type of SDB remained unchanged (78.9% in obstructive sleep apnoea and 44.4% in central sleep apnoea). The only predictors of SDB at baseline were higher age and body mass index and in the chronic phase additionally baseline AHI. Baseline AHI was associated with functional outcome (modified Rankin score &gt;3) at M3.The high prevalence of SDB in acute stroke, its persistence after 3 months, and the association with functional outcome supports the recommendation for a rapid SDB screening in stroke patients