Inhibition of IGF-1R-dependent PI3K activation sensitizes colon cancer cells specifically to DR5-mediated apoptosis but not to rhTRAIL

Background: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) initiates apoptosis in tumor cells upon binding to its cognate agonistic receptors, death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5). The activity of the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) survival pathway is often increased in cancer, influencing both cell proliferation and apoptosis. We hypothesized that inhibiting the IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) using NVP-AEW541, a small molecular weight tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the IGF-1R, could increase death receptor (DR)-mediated apoptosis in colon cancer cells

Modulation of TRAIL resistance in colon carcinoma cells: Different contributions of DR4 and DR5

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>rhTRAIL is a therapeutic agent, derived from the TRAIL cytokine, which induces apoptosis in cancer cells by activating the membrane death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5). Here, we investigated each receptor's contribution to rhTRAIL sensitivity and rhTRAIL resistance. We assessed whether agonistic DR4 or DR5 antibodies could be used to circumvent rhTRAIL resistance, alone or in combination with various chemotherapies.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Our study was performed in an isogenic model comprised of the SW948 human colon carcinoma cell line and its rhTRAIL resistant sub-line SW948-TR. Effects of rhTRAIL and agonistic DR4/DR5 antibodies on cell viability were measured using MTT assays and identification of morphological changes characteristic of apoptosis, after acridine orange staining. Sensitivity to the different death receptor ligands was stimulated using pretreatment with the cytokine IFN-gamma and the proteasome inhibitor MG-132. To investigate the mechanisms underlying the changes in rhTRAIL sensitivity, alterations in expression levels of targets of interest were measured by Western blot analysis. Co-immunoprecipitation was used to determine the composition of the death-inducing signalling complex at the cell membrane.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>SW948 cells were sensitive to all three of the DR-targeting agents tested, although the agonistic DR5 antibody induced only weak caspase 8 cleavage and limited apoptosis. Surprisingly, agonistic DR4 and DR5 antibodies induced equivalent DISC formation and caspase 8 cleavage at the level of their individual receptors, suggesting impairment of further caspase 8 processing upon DR5 stimulation. SW948-TR cells were cross-resistant to all DR-targeting agents as a result of decreased caspase 8 expression levels. Caspase 8 protein expression was restored by MG-132 and IFN-gamma pretreatment, which also re-established sensitivity to rhTRAIL and agonistic DR4 antibody in SW948-TR. Surprisingly, MG-132 but not IFN-gamma could also increase DR5-mediated apoptosis in SW948-TR.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results highlight a critical difference between DR4- and DR5-mediated apoptotic signaling modulation, with possible implications for future combinatorial regimens.</p

Expression of TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) and its receptors in normal colonic mucosa, adenomas, and carcinomas

Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis intumour cell lines. Four membrane-bound receptors for TRAIL have been identified, two apoptosis-mediating receptors, DR4 and DR5, and two apoptosis-inhibiting receptors, DcR1 and DcR2. The aim of this study was to examine the role of TRAIL and its receptors in colorectal cancer development. The immunohistochemical expression and localization of TRAIL and its receptors were investigated in normal mucosa (n = 10), adenomas (n = 19), and carcinomas (n = 21). Correlations between the expression of TRAIL and its receptors and the degree of apoptosis (assessed by M30 expression) and histopathological characteristics were explored. TRAIL and its receptors were expressed in normal mucosal epithelium. Expression of the receptors was seen in adenomas and carcinomas. TRAIL expression was lost in a subset of colorectal tumours, more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas (p <0.05). DR4 and DR5 staining was stronger in neoplastic cells than in normal cells and was accompanied by a higher degree of apoptosis. No differences were found between tumour and normal cells regarding DcR1 and DcR2 expression. No correlations were found between TRAIL or TRAIL receptor expression and histopathological characteristics. In conclusion, marked changes were seen in the course of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence with respect to the expression of TRAIL and TRAIL receptors DR4 and DR5. The stronger expression of DR4 and DR5 in neoplastic cells than in normal cells, together with a higher degree of apoptosis, suggests a possible functional role for these receptors in apoptosis induction in neoplastic colorectal cells. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd

Modulation of death receptor pathways in oncology

Chemotherapeutic efficacy is hampered by occurrence of drug resistance. Several mechanisms cause this phenomenon. A final common factor is the reduced capacity of resistant cells to go into apoptosis following treatment with DNA-damaging agents. It is therefore interesting to search for ways to facilitate this apoptotic process following use of chemotherapeutic drugs. The death receptor ligands tumor necrosis factor (TNF), FasL and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) might be interesting candidates as they are able to induce apoptosis by binding to their cell membrane receptors. Recombinant forms of these ligands potentiate chemotherapeutic drug effects in preclinical models. For the clinical application of TNF, FasL and TRAIL, it is of primary importance that their safety be guaranteed. RhTNF is the only ligand currently used in humans. However, systemic rhTNF has shown low antitumor activity and higher doses induce severe sepsis-like toxicity. Perfusion setting aimed at limb preservation with rhTNF plus melphalan is currently used in sarcoma patients. A number of options have been tested in the preclinical setting that might allow circumvention of TNF toxicity in the clinic. Systemic rhFasL administration in humans is not yet feasible because of observed severe liver toxicity in mice due to Fas-mediated apoptosis of hepatocytes. Measures to circumvent liver toxicity have not yet been exploited. Another option for using FasL in the clinic may be to identify an alternative route of administration. In the animal model, FasL appeared to be less toxic for the liver compared with anti-Fas antibodies when administered intraperitoneally. There are relatively nontoxic modulators of the Fas death pathway, such as interferon and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which might prove interesting in combination with chemotherapy. Finally, it may be possible to produce a modified FasL with a reduced toxicity profile. TRAIL, produced as soluble, zinc-stabilized rhTRAIL seems to be without preclinical toxicity. Agonistic DR4 and DR5 antibodies against their TRAIL death receptor are being studied as another potential clinical option to induce apoptosis. Due to the synergistic effect observed in the preclinical setting between death receptor ligands and other modulators of the death receptor pathways and chemotherapy, it may well be that this approach is especially of value in the clinic when combined with chemotherapy. Ideally, choices for specific (modified) death receptor ligands for the treatment of patients can be rationally made based on tumor characteristics. (C) 2003 Prous Science. All rights reserved