2 research outputs found
2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern
Deciding when to return to sport after injury is complex
and multifactorial—an exercise in risk management.
Return to sport decisions are made every day by
clinicians, athletes and coaches, ideally in a collaborative
way. The purpose of this consensus statement was to
present and synthesise current evidence to make
recommendations for return to sport decision-making,
clinical practice and future research directions related to
returning athletes to sport. A half day meeting was held
in Bern, Switzerland, after the First World Congress in
Sports Physical Therapy. 17 expert clinicians participated.
4 main sections were initially agreed upon, then
participants elected to join 1 of the 4 groups—each
group focused on 1 section of the consensus statement.
Participants in each group discussed and summarised the
key issues for their section before the 17-member group
met again for discussion to reach consensus on the
content of the 4 sections. Return to sport is not a
decision taken in isolation at the end of the recovery and
rehabilitation process. Instead, return to sport should be
viewed as a continuum, paralleled with recovery and
rehabilitation. Biopsychosocial models may help the
clinician make sense of individual factors that may
influence the athlete’s return to sport, and the Strategic
Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance framework may
help decision-makers synthesise information to make an
optimal return to sport decision. Research evidence to
support return to sport decisions in clinical practice is
scarce. Future research should focus on a standardised
approach to defining, measuring and reporting return to
sport outcomes, and identifying valuable prognostic
factors for returning to sport
Infographic: 2016 consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern.
2016 Consensus statement on return to spor