Class III obesity is a risk factor for the development of acute on chronic liver failure in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome of systemic inflammation and organ failures. Obesity, also characterized by chronic inflammation, is a risk factor among patients with cirrhosis for decompensation, infection, and mortality. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that obesity predisposes to ACLF development in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: We examined the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, from 2005-2016, characterizing patients at wait-listing as non-obese (BMI < 30), obese class I-II (BMI 30-39.9) and obese class III (BMI≥40). ACLF was determined based on the CANONIC study definition. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the association between obesity and ACLF development at liver transplantation (LT). We confirmed our findings using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), years 2009-2013, using validated diagnostic coding algorithms to identify obesity, hepatic decompensation and ACLF. Logistic regression evaluated the association between obesity and ACLF occurrence. RESULTS: Among 387,884 with decompensated cirrhosis, 116,704 patients (30.1%) were identified as having ACLF in both databases. Multivariable modeling from the UNOS database revealed class III obesity to be an independent risk factor for ACLF at LT (HR=1.24, 95% CI 1.09-1.41, p<0.001). This finding was confirmed using the NIS (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.25-1.35, p<0.001). Regarding specific organ failures, analysis of both registries demonstrated patients with class I-II and class III obesity had greater prevalence of renal failure. CONCLUSION: Class III obesity is a newly identified risk factor for ACLF development in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Obese patients have a particularly higher prevalence of renal failure as a component of ACLF. These findings have important implications regarding stratifying risk and preventing the occurrence of ACLF. LAY SUMMARY: In this study, we identify that among patients with decompensated cirrhosis, class III obesity is a modifiable risk factor for the development of acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). We further demonstrate that regarding the specific organ failures associated with ACLF, renal failure is significantly more prevalent among obese patients, particularly class III obesity. These findings underscore the importance of weight management in cirrhosis, to reduce the risk of ACLF. Patients with class III obesity should be monitored closely for the development of renal failure

a cohort study

The impact of multidrug-resistant (MDR) colonization and MDR infection in critically ill cirrhosis patients remains unclear. We assessed the association of MDR colonization and MDR infection with these patients' survival. Observational cohort study including adult cirrhosis patients admitted to 5 intensive care units at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (Chicago, Illinois, USA) on January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017. Patients admitted for elective liver transplant or with previous liver transplant were excluded. Patients were screened for MDR colonization on intensive care unit admission. Infection diagnoses during the intensive care unit stay were considered. The primary endpoint was hospital transplant-free survival. Among 600 patients included, 362 (60%) were men and median (interquartile range) age was 58.0 (49.0, 64.0) years. Median (interquartile range) Model for End-stage Liver Disease, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Chronic Liver Failure - Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure scores on intensive care unit day 1 were 28.0 (20.0, 36.0), 9.0 (6.0, 13.0), and 55.0 (48.0, 64.0), respectively. Overall, 76 (13%) patients were transplanted and 443 (74%) survived the hospital stay. Infections were diagnosed in 347 (58%) patients: pneumonia in 197 (33%), urinary tract infection in 119 (20%), peritonitis in 93 (16%), bloodstream infection in 99 (16%), Clostridium difficile colitis in 9 (2%), and catheter tip infection in 7 (1%). MDR colonization and MDR infection were identified in 200 (33%) and 69 (12%) patients, respectively. MDR colonization was associated with MDR infection (p < 0.001). MDR colonization or MDR infection was associated with higher number and duration of antibiotics (p < 0.001). Following adjustment for covariables (age, sex, etiology, portal hypertension, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score), MDR colonization [OR (95% CI), 0.64 (0.43, 0.95)] or MDR infection [adjusted OR (95% CI), 0.22 (0.12, 0.40)] were independently associated with lower transplant-free survival. Among critically ill cirrhosis patients, MDR colonization or MDR infection portended a worse prognosis.publishersversionpublishe

Patients with severe acute‐on‐chronic liver failure are disadvantaged by model for end‐stage liver disease‐based organ allocation policy

Background: Mortality for patients with acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) may be underestimated by the model for end‐stage liver disease‐sodium (MELD‐Na) score. / Aim: To assess waitlist outcomes across varying grades of ACLF among a cohort of patients listed with a MELD‐Na score ≥35, and therefore having similar priority for liver transplantation. / Methods: We analysed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, years 2010‐2017. Waitlist outcomes were evaluated using Fine and Gray's competing risks regression. / Results: We identified 6342 candidates at listing with a MELD‐Na score ≥35, of whom 3122 had ACLF‐3. Extra‐hepatic organ failures were present primarily in patients with four to six organ failures. Competing risks regression revealed that candidates listed with ACLF‐3 had a significantly higher risk for 90‐day waitlist mortality (Sub‐hazard ratio (SHR) = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12‐1.78) relative to patients with lower ACLF grades. Subgroup analysis of ACLF‐3 revealed that both the presence of three organ failures (SHR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.20‐1.63) or four to six organ failures at listing (SHR = 3.01; 95% CI 2.54‐3.58) was associated with increased waitlist death. Candidates with four to six organ failures also had the lowest likelihood of receiving liver transplantation (SHR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.54‐0.68). The Share 35 rule was associated with reduced 90‐day waitlist mortality among the full cohort of patients listed with ACLF‐3 and MELD‐Na score ≥35 (SHR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.49‐0.70). However, Share 35 rule implementation was not associated with reduced waitlist mortality among patients with four to six organ failures (SHR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.58‐1.02). / Conclusion: The MELD‐Na score disadvantages patients with ACLF‐3, both with and without extra‐hepatic organ failures. Incorporation of organ failures into allocation policy warrants further exploration

Effect of the clinical course of acute-on-chronic liver failure prior to liver transplantation on post-transplant survival

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) can be listed for liver transplantation (LT) because LT is the only curative treatment option. We evaluated whether the clinical course of ACLF, particularly ACLF-3, between the time of listing and LT affects 1-year post-transplant survival. METHODS: We identified patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who were transplanted within 28 days of listing and categorized them by ACLF grade at waitlist registration and LT, according to the EASL-CLIF definition. RESULTS: A total of 3,636 patients listed with ACLF-3 underwent LT within 28 days. Among those transplanted, 892 (24.5%) recovered to no ACLF or ACLF grade 1 or 2 (ACLF 0–2) and 2,744 (75.5%) had ACLF-3 at transplantation. One-year survival was 82.0% among those transplanted with ACLF-3 vs. 88.2% among those improving to ACLF 0–2 (p 60 years of age, 1-year survival was significantly higher among those who improved from ACLF-3 to ACLF 0–2 than among those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement from ACLF-3 at listing to ACLF 0–2 at transplantation enhances post-LT survival, particularly in those who recovered from circulatory or brain failure, or were removed from the mechanical ventilator. The beneficial effect of improved ACLF on post-LT survival was also observed among patients >60 years of age. LAY SUMMARY: Liver transplantation (LT) for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3 (ACLF-3) significantly improves survival, but 1-year survival probability after LT remains lower than the expected outcomes for transplant centers. Our study reveals that among patients transplanted within 28 days of waitlist registration, improvement of ACLF-3 at listing to a lower grade of ACLF at transplantation significantly enhances post-transplant survival, even among patients aged 60 years or older. Subgroup analysis further demonstrates that improvement in circulatory failure, brain failure, or removal from mechanical ventilation have the strongest impact on post-transplant survival

Longterm Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

AIMS: Recent data have demonstrated greater than 80% one-year survival probability after liver transplantation (LT) for patients with severe acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). However, long term outcomes and complications are still unknown for this population. Our aim was to compare long-term patient and graft survival among patients transplanted across all grades of ACLF. METHODS: We analyzed the UNOS database, years 2004-2017. Patients with ACLF were identified using the EASL-CLIF criteria. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to determine patient and graft survival and associated predictors of mortality in adjusted models. RESULTS: A total of 75,844 patients were transplanted of which 48,854 (64.4%) had no ACLF, 9,337 (12.3%) had ACLF-1, 9,386 (12.4%) had ACLF-2 and 8,267 (10.9%) had ACLF-3. Patients transplanted without ACLF had a greater proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma within (23.8%) and outside (12.7%) Milan criteria. Five-year patient survival after LT was lower in the ACLF-3 patients compared with the other groups (67.7%, p<0.001), although after year 1, the percentage decrease in survival was similar among all groups. Infection was the primary cause of death among all patient groups in the first year. After the first year, infection was the main cause of death in patients transplanted with ACLF-1 (31.1%), ACLF-2 (33.3%) and ACLF-3 (36.7%), whereas malignancy was the predominant cause of death in those transplanted with no ACLF (38.5%). Graft survival probability at 5 years was above 90% among all patient groups. CONCLUSION: Patients transplanted with ACLF-3 have lower 5-year survival as compared to ACLF 0-2 but mortality rates were not significantly different after the first year following LT. Graft survival was excellent across all ACLF groups

Predicting restoration of kidney function during CRRT-free intervals

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Renal failure is common in critically ill patients and frequently requires continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). CRRT is discontinued at regular intervals for routine changes of the disposable equipment or for replacing clogged filter membrane assemblies. The present study was conducted to determine if the necessity to continue CRRT could be predicted during the CRRT-free period.</p> <p>Materials and methods</p> <p>In the period from 2003 to 2006, 605 patients were treated with CRRT in our ICU. A total of 222 patients with 448 CRRT-free intervals had complete data sets and were used for analysis. Of the total CRRT-free periods, 225 served as an evaluation group. Twenty-nine parameters with an assumed influence on kidney function were analyzed with regard to their potential to predict the restoration of kidney function during the CRRT-free interval. Using univariate analysis and logistic regression, a prospective index was developed and validated in the remaining 223 CRRT-free periods to establish its prognostic strength.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Only three parameters showed an independent influence on the restoration of kidney function during CRRT-free intervals: the number of previous CRRT cycles (medians in the two outcome groups: 1 vs. 2), the "Sequential Organ Failure Assessment"-score (means in the two outcome groups: 8.3 vs. 9.2) and urinary output after the cessation of CRRT (medians in two outcome groups: 66 ml/h vs. 10 ml/h). The prognostic index, which was calculated from these three variables, showed a satisfactory potential to predict the kidney function during the CRRT-free intervals; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.798.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Restoration of kidney function during CRRT-free periods can be predicted with an index calculated from three variables. Prospective trials in other hospitals must clarify whether our results are generally transferable to other patient populations.</p

Management of toxic ingestions with the use of renal replacement therapy

Although rare, renal replacement therapy (RRT) for the treatment of the metabolic, respiratory and hemodynamic complications of intoxications may be required. Understanding the natural clearance of the medications along with their volume of distribution, protein binding and molecular weight will help in understanding the benefit of commencing RRT. This information will aid in choosing the optimal forms of RRT in an urgent setting. Overdose of common pediatric medications are discussed with suggestions on the type of RRT within this educational review