Quality indicators for gastric cancer surgery: a survey of practicing pathologists in Ontario.

BACKGROUND: Adequate lymph node (LN) assessment and R0 resection are critical to the staging and management of gastric cancer. The American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer recommend at least 15 LN be assessed, and the literature suggests a gross disease-free margin of 5-6 cm be achieved. Results of an Ontario general surgeons' survey indicated these standards were not widely known. Because disease management is highly collaborative, we surveyed pathologists to assess their knowledge of LN assessment and margins for processing gastric cancer specimens. METHODS: Pathologists were identified by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and MD Select databases. Participants were surveyed online or by mail. RESULTS: Pathologists indicated a goal of assessing 20 LN (11%). Most self-reported an actual assessment of 5-10 LN (49%), with 88% reporting a number below current standards. Additionally, 54% of responding pathologists identified >1 cm as an adequate gross margin, and 89% of pathologists indicated a response below current standards. Ninety-four percent of pathologists agreed that more education on gastric cancer is valuable. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the quality of gastric cancer management, our findings suggest the need for clear, consistent guidelines for adequate gross margin resection length. Furthermore, there is a critical need for education aimed at closing the knowledge gap among practicing pathologists and surgeons regarding current recommended guidelines for LN assessment and adequate margin length

Improving the quality of processing gastric cancer specimens: the pathologist's perspective.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Research into surgeon and pathologist knowledge of guidelines for lymph node (LN) assessment in gastric cancer demonstrated a knowledge deficit. To understand factors affecting optimal assessment we surveyed pathologists to identify external barriers. METHODS: Pathologists were identified using two Ontario physician databases and surveyed online or by mail, with a 40% response rate. RESULTS: The majority (56%) of pathologists stated assessing an additional five LNs would not be a burden. Most (80%) pathologists disagreed with pay for performance for achieving quality standards. Qualitative analysis determined the majority of pathologists believed achieving quality standards was inherent to their profession and should not require incentives. Poor surgical specimen was identified as a barrier and underscores the importance of aiming quality improvement initiatives at the multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSION: In addition to education, tailoring an intervention to address all barriers, including laboratory constraints may be an effective means of improving gastric cancer care