Two family interventions to reduce BMI in low-income urban youth: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Our primary aim was to evaluate the effects of 2 family-based obesity management interventions compared with a control group on BMI in low-income adolescents with overweight or obesity. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 360 urban-residing youth and a parent were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 behaviorally distinct family interventions or an education-only control group. Eligible children were entering the sixth grade with a BMI $85th percentile. Interventions were 3 years in length; data were collected annually for 3 years. Effects of the interventions on BMI slope (primary outcome) over 3 years and a set of secondary outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Participants were primarily African American (77%), had a family income of,25 000 per year, and obese at enrollment (68%). BMI increased over time in all study groups, with group increases ranging from 0.95 to 1.08. In an intent-to-treat analysis, no significant differences were found in adjusted BMI slopes between either of the family-based interventions and the control group (P = .35). No differences were found between the experimental and control groups on secondary outcomes of diet, physical activity, sleep, perceived stress, or cardiometabolic factors. No evidence of effect modification of the study arms by sex, race and/or ethnicity, household income, baseline levels of child and parent obesity, or exposure to a school fitness program were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this low-income, adolescent population, neither of the family-based interventions improved BMI or health-related secondary outcomes. Future interventions should more fully address poverty and other social issues contributing to childhood obesity

The expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in paraffin sections of peripheral, node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.

Cell proliferation of 40 peripheral, node-negative non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) treated with surgery alone was investigated by immunohistochemical analysis with the monoclonal antibody (MoAb) PC10, which recognizes a proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded material. Results were correlated with DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) analyzed by DNA flow cytometric study. Mitotic count (MC) was analyzed by light microscopic study and histopathologic features. PCNA immunoreactivity was seen in all samples and confined to the nuclei of cancer, but not to the surrounding, tumor-negative cells; its frequency ranged from 0-70% (median, 15%), and tumors expressed either a low (0-25%, n = 25) or intermediate (26-75%, n = 15) proliferative activity. There was no relationship between PCNA immunoreactivity and tumor stage or among size, histologic type, and mitotic count (MC). Tumors with intratumoral blood vessel invasion (BVI) showed a significantly higher (P less than 0.005) PCNA immunoreactivity than BVI-negative tumors. PCNA scores were significantly higher (P less than 0.005) in DNA aneuploid (n = 22) than in DNA diploid (n = 18) tumors and correlated significantly with the SPF of DNA aneuploid tumors (r = 0.825, P less than 0.0001), but not with diploid tumors (r = 0.002, P = 0.9). Intermediate proliferating tumors had a significantly higher (P less than 0.01) MC than their counterparts. In univariate analysis, significant predictors of survival were tumor classification (T1 versus T2), tumor size (less than or equal to 2.6 cm versus more than 2.6 cm), BVI (BVI-negative versus BVI-positive), MC (less than or equal to 8 versus more than 8), and PCNA immunoreactivity (low versus intermediate). DNA ploidy and SPF did not influence survival significantly. Only PCNA immunoreactivity retained its independent level of significance (P = 0.02) by multivariate analysis. It was concluded that PCNA immunostaining is a simple and clinically useful method for estimating cell proliferation in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of resected peripheral, node-negative NSCLC