Psychological distress among frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic:A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Novel virus outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may increase psychological distress among frontline workers. Psychological distress may lead to reduced performance, reduced employability or even burnout. In the present study, we assessed experienced psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic from a self-determination theory perspective. METHODS: This mixed-methods study, with repeated measures, used surveys (quantitative data) combined with audio diaries (qualitative data) to assess work-related COVID-19 experiences, psychological need satisfaction and frustration, and psychological distress over time. Forty-six participants (nurses, junior doctors, and consultants) completed 259 surveys and shared 60 audio diaries. Surveys and audio diaries were analysed separately. RESULTS: Quantitative results indicated that perceived psychological distress during COVID-19 was higher than pre-COVID-19 and fluctuated over time. Need frustration, specifically autonomy and competence, was positively associated with psychological distress, while need satisfaction, especially relatedness, was negatively associated with psychological distress. In the qualitative, thematic analysis, we observed that especially organisational logistics (rostering, work-life balance, and internal communication) frustrated autonomy, and unfamiliarity with COVID-19 frustrated competence. Despite many need frustrating experiences, a strong connection with colleagues and patients were important sources of relatedness support (i.e. need satisfaction) that seemed to mitigate psychological distress. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase of psychological distress among frontline workers. Both need frustration and need satisfaction explained unique variance of psychological distress, but seemed to originate from different sources. Challenging times require healthcare organisations to better support their professionals by tailored formal and informal support. We propose to address both indirect (e.g. organisation) and direct (e.g. colleagues) elements of the clinical and social environment in order to reduce need frustration and enhance need satisfaction

Development and evaluation of the taxonomy of trauma leadership skills-shortened for observation and reflection in training: A practical tool for observing and reflecting on trauma leadership performance

Introduction: Trauma leadership skills are increasingly being addressed in trauma courses, but few resources are available to systematically observe and debrief trainees' performances. The authors therefore translated their previously developed, extensive Taxonomy of Trauma Leadership Skills (TTLS) into a practical observation tool that is tailored to the vocabulary of clinician instructors and their workflow and workload during simulation-based training. Methods: In 2016 to 2018, the TTLS was subjected to practical evaluation in an iterative process of 2 stages. In the first stage, testing panels of trauma specialists observed excerpts from videotaped simulations and indicated from the list of elements which behaviors they felt were being shown. Any ambiguities or redundancy were addressed by rephrasing or combining elements. In the second stage, iterations were used in actual scenario training to observe and debrief trainees' performances. The instructors' recommendations resulted in further improvements of clarity, ease of use, and usefulness, until no new suggestions were raised. Results: The resultant "TTLS-Shortened for Observation and Reflection in Training"was given a simpler structure and more concrete and self-explanatory benchmarks. It contains 6 skill categories for evaluation, each with 4 to 6 benchmark behaviors. Conclusions: The TTLS-Shortened for Observation and Reflection in Training is an important addition to other trauma assessment tools because of its specific focus on leadership skills. It helps set concrete performance expectations, simplify note taking, and target observations and debriefings. One central challenge was striking a balance between its conciseness and specificity. The authors reflected on how the decisions for the resultant structure ease and leverage the conduct of observations and performance debriefing

Feasibility of the new sutureless excimer laser-assisted non-occlusive anastomosis clip in a rabbit model

BACKGROUND: The excimer laser-assisted non-occlusive anastomosis (ELANA) technique facilitates the construction of anastomoses without temporary occlusion of the recipient artery. Experiments aimed at simplifying the technique eventually resulted in a sutureless ELANA slide (SEsl) anastomosis. After the first clinical use, new insights lead to the application of a clip at the back of the device, the SELANA clip (SEcl). The SEcl offers a distinct advantage over the SEsl since no sealant is necessary. In this study, we determine the feasibility of the SEcl anastomosis in an in vivo rabbit model

Early posttraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage due to dissecting aneurysms in three children

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to a ruptured saccular aneurysm is uncommon in children. Pediatric traumatic aneurysms have been reported relatively frequently, tending to bleed after an interval of weeks after head injury. The authors describe three children with acute SAH after head injury caused by intracranial dissecting aneurysms. When head trauma in children is complicated by SAH in basal cisterns, dissecting aneurysms should be considered and treated, because rebleeding may occur

MR angiography as a screening tool for intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, test characteristics, and interobserver agreement

OBJECTIVE: MR angiography may be an appropriate tool to screen for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Feasibility, test characteristics, and interobserver agreement in evaluation of MR angiograms were assessed by members of the MARS (Magnetic resonance Angiography in Relatives of patients with Subarachnoid hemorrhage) Study Group. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We screened 626 first-degree relatives of a consecutive series of 193 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage examined at two institutions. We used MR imaging and MR angiography (three-dimensional time-of-flight imaging at both institutions and additional three-dimensional phase-contrast imaging at one institution). Three observers independently assessed the MR angiograms. Conventional angiography was performed in relatives with possible or definite aneurysms on MR angiography and was considered the standard of reference. RESULTS: Thirty-three aneurysms were found in 25 (4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3-6%) of 626 relatives. Thirteen (8%) of 169 relatives who refused screening had MR-related reasons; an additional six persons could not be screened because of contraindications for MR imaging (pregnancy, n = 1; claustrophobia, n = 5). The positive predictive value of MR angiography was 100% (95% CI, 79-100%) for "definite" aneurysms and 58% (95% CI, 28-85%) for "possible" aneurysms. Sensitivity of MR angiography was estimated at 83% (95% CI, 65-94%) and specificity at 97% (95% CI, 94-98%). Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of MR angiograms was poor (kappa < .30), probably because different diagnostic strategies used by individual observers resulted in different use of the assessment category "possible aneurysm." CONCLUSION: MR angiography is a feasible screening tool for detection of intracranial aneurysms. Positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity are acceptable when at least two neuroradiologists independently assess MR angiogram