Prostatic sarcoma after treatment of rectal cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The relationship between radiation exposure for treatment of cancer and occurrence of a second primary cancer at the irradiated site is well known. This phenomenon is however rare in prostate.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>A 75-year-old farmer was treated for rectal cancer with preoperative 45 Gy of radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection. Four years later he developed symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction and acute urinary retention. He underwent a transurethral resection of the prostate. Histological examination of the removed prostate tissue and immunohistochemistry revealed it to be a poorly differentiated sarcoma.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We believe this to be the first reported case of radiation-induced sarcoma following radiotherapy treatment for rectal cancer. Since radiotherapy plays a pivotal role in the contemporary treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma, it is relevant to be aware of the potential long-term carcinogenic complications of radiotherapy of the pelvis.</p

COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a subanalysis of the OnCovid registry

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at higher risk of COVID-19 complications and mortality than the rest of the population. Breast cancer patients seem to have better prognosis when infected by SARS-CoV-2 than other cancer patients. METHODS: We report a subanalysis of the OnCovid study providing more detailed information in the breast cancer population. RESULTS: We included 495 breast cancer patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mean age was 62.6 years; 31.5% presented more than one comorbidity. The most frequent breast cancer subtype was luminal-like (n = 245, 49.5%) and 177 (35.8%) had metastatic disease. A total of 332 (67.1%) patients were receiving active treatment, with radical intent in 232 (47.6%) of them. Hospitalization rate was 58.2% and all-cause mortality rate was 20.3%. One hundred twenty-nine (26.1%) patients developed one COVID-19 complication, being acute respiratory failure the most common (n = 74, 15.0%). In the multivariable analysis, age older than 70 years, presence of COVID-19 complications, and metastatic disease were factors correlated with worse outcomes, while ongoing anticancer therapy at time of COVID-19 diagnosis appeared to be a protective factor. No particular oncological treatment was related to higher risk of complications. In the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 73 (18.3%) patients had some kind of modification on their oncologic treatment. At the first oncological reassessment (median time: 46.9 days ± 36.7), 255 (51.6%) patients reported to be fully recovered from the infection. There were 39 patients (7.9%) with long-term SARS-CoV-2-related complications. CONCLUSION: In the context of COVID-19, our data confirm that breast cancer patients appear to have lower complications and mortality rate than expected in other cancer populations. Most breast cancer patients can be safely treated for their neoplasm during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Oncological treatment has no impact on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 complications, and, especially in the curative setting, the treatment should be modified as little as possible

Nerve conduction, circulating osteopontin and taxane-induced neuropathy in breast cancer patients

Objective: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a disabling complication related to taxanes. Underlying mechanisms are not completely understood and no specific treatment exists. We investigated the role of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and of serum osteopontin (OPN) measurement as a means to stratify the risk of developing taxane-induced neuropathy (TIN). Methods: We enrolled 50 women with breast cancer treated with taxanes (docetaxel or paclitaxel) in a 3-month prospective study. They were evaluated before chemotherapy (time-point T0) and followed up at 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months with clinical examinations/scales, quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, NCS, and serum OPN dosages. Results: A reduction of sural and superficial peroneal sensory action potentials was seen at T1, with a progression at T2 (P < 0.001). In contrast, a significant impact of neuropathic symptoms on QoL only occurred at T2 (P < 0.01). OPN levels at T0 inversely correlated to axonal loss in the sural nerve (T0\u2013T2, P < 0.01). OPN levels at T0 were lower in the intermediate and poor outcome patient subgroups, compared to the good outcome subgroup, as specifically defined (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Lower limb NCS changes occurred earlier than the detrimental effects of TIN on patients\u2019 QoL. Low serum OPN levels before chemotherapy may represent a novel biomarker of TIN risk