The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in tethered cord surgery

The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) with surgical detethering in dysraphic patients has been questioned. A retrospective analysis of our series of 65 patients is presented with special focus on technical set-up and outcome. All patients were diagnosed with a tethered cord (TC) due to spinal dysraphism. A high-risk group (HRG) was determined consisting of 40 patients with a lipomyelomeningocele and/or a split cord malformation sometimes in combination with a tight filum terminale. The surgical procedure was a detethering operation in all cases performed by a single surgeon during a 9-year period (1999-2008). A standard set-up of IONM was used in all patients consisting of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and electrical nerve root stimulation. In young patients, conditioning stimulation was applied in order to improve absent or weak MEPs. IONM responses could be obtained in all patients. Postoperative deterioration of symptoms was found in two patients of whom one patient belonged to the HRG. Mean maximal follow-up of all 65 patients was 4.6 years (median 4.1 years). Long-term deterioration of symptoms was found in 6 of 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years (median 5.3 years). The use of IONM is feasible in all TC patients. The identification of functional nervous structures and continuous guarding of the integrity of sacral motor roots by IONM may contribute to the safety of surgical detethering

Національно-демократичні об'єднання та політичні партії в Україні кінця XIX - початку XX століття

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become increasingly important for the treatment and relief of neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease, tremor, dystonia and psychiatric illness. As DBS implantations and any other stereotactic and functional surgical procedure require accurate, precise and safe targeting of the brain structure, the technical aids for preoperative planning, intervention and postoperative follow-up have become increasingly important. The aim of this paper was to give and overview, from a biomedical engineering perspective, of a typical implantation procedure and current supporting techniques. Furthermore, emerging technical aids not yet clinically established are presented. This includes the state-of-the-art of neuroimaging and navigation, patient-specific simulation of DBS electric field, optical methods for intracerebral guidance, movement pattern analysis, intraoperative data visualisation and trends related to new stimulation devices. As DBS surgery already today is an important technology intensive domain, an "intuitive visualisation" interface for improving management of these data in relation to surgery is suggested

The Percentage of Amplitude Decrease Warning Criteria for Transcranial MEP Monitoring

Muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) became a standard technique for monitoring the motor functions of the brain and spinal cord at risk during spinal and brain surgery. However, a wide range of criteria based on the percentage of amplitude decrease is used in practice. A survey of the current literature on clinical outcome parameters reveals a variety of percentages in a range of 30% to 100% (50% to 100% spinal procedures) with no consensus. The interpretation of muscle MEPs is hampered by their sensitivity to many interfering factors. Trial-to-trial MEP variations may partly be reduced by controllable parameters of which TES parameters are in the hands of the neuromonitorist. We propose an operational model based on basic neurophysiologic knowledge to interpret the characteristics of MEP-TES voltage curves and predict the influences of the location on the sigmoid voltage curve on spontaneous MEP-variations and influences of factors affecting the voltage curve. The model predicts a correlation between the slope, expressed by a gain, and variations of muscle MEP amplitudes. This complies with two case examples. The limited specificity/sensitivity of warning criteria based on the percentage of amplitude reduction can possibly be improved by developing standards for set-up procedures of TES paradigms. These procedures include strategies for desensitizing MEPs for variations of controllable parameters. The TES voltage or current is a feasible controlling parameter and should be related to the motor threshold and the onset of the supramaximal level being landmarks of MEP-voltage functions. These parameters may offer a valuable addition to multicenter outcome studies

The acoustic detection of intracranial aneurysms: A clinical study

A new recording method for the acoustical detection of intracranial aneurysms is presented. A study examining the capability of the method to discriminate between patients with an aneurysm and control patients by a simple, objective parameter is reported. Sound signals were recorded over the eyes, and a real-time spectral analysis was performed on these signals. For this study, recordings performed on 26 patients with an aneurysm were compared with recordings on 26 age- and sex-matched control patients without intracerebral abnormalities. As a result of measures taken to reduce artifacts and to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, the measurements were performed reliably, with little inconvenience for the patients; all measurements could be used for analysis. The power spectra measured in the control patients showed a typical, smoothly descending pattern; those measured in the aneurysm patients clearly differed from this pattern, showing peaks of varying width, height, and dominant frequency. For the objective judgment of the power spectra, the power median is introduced. The sensitivity and specificity of this parameter were determined. Possible methods to improve the results will be discussed

Movement along the spine induced by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) related electrode positioning.

Item does not contain fulltex

Recovery of TES-MEPs During Surgical Decompression of the Spine: A Case Series of Eight Patients

Purpose: This study aimed to illustrate the recovery of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials during surgical decompression of the spinal cord in patients with impaired motor function preoperatively. Specific attention was paid to the duration of neurologic symptoms before surgery and the postoperative clinical recovery. Methods: A case series of eight patients was selected from a cohort of 74 patients that underwent spine surgery. The selected patients initially had low or absent transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials followed by a significant increase after surgical decompression of the spinal cord. Results: A significant intraoperative increase in amplitude of motor evoked potentials was detected after decompression of the spinal cord or cauda equina in patients suffering from spinal canal stenosis (n = 2), extradural meningioma (n = 3), or a herniated nucleus polposus (n = 3). This was related to an enhanced neurologic outcome only if patients (n = 6) had a short onset (less than = year) of neurologic impairment before surgery. Conclusions: In patients with a short onset of neurologic impairment because of compression of the spinal cord or caudal fibers, an intraoperative recovery of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can indicate an improvement of motor function postoperatively. Therefore, transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can be considered as a useful tool to the surgeon to monitor the quality of decompression of the spinal cord

Optimum interpulse interval for transcranial electrical train stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials of maximal amplitude in both upper and lower extremity target muscles

<p>Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the optimum interpulse interval (OIPI) for transcranial electrical train stimulation to elicit muscle motor evoked potentials (TES-MEP) with maximal amplitude in upper and lower extremities during intra-operative spinal cord monitoring.</p><p>Methods: Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring with TES-MEP was performed in 26 patients who had (corrective) spine surgery. Optimum interpulse interval (OIPI) were determined for the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) representing the upper extremity and the anterior tibialis muscle (TA) representing the lower extremity. The IPI was varied between 0.5 and 4.0 ms, where the OIPI was defined as the IPI with the highest muscle MEP amplitude for each muscle group. Differences between upper and lower extremity OIPIs were analyzed. Furthermore, the MEP amplitudes difference between the upper and lower extremity OIPIs and between the OIPI and IPI 2 ms was determined.</p><p>Results: The mean OIPIAPB representing the upper extremity was 1.78 +/- 1.09 ms on the left side and 1.82 +/- 0.93 ms on the right side. The lower extremity showed a mean OIPITA of 2.26 +/- 1.16 ms on the left and 2.73 +/- 0.88 ms on the right side. The mean differences between the OIPIAPB and OIPITA were significant for p = 0.019 (Student's T-test). No within patient differences in OIPIs between the left and the right side were found.</p><p>Results: The mean MEP amplitude reduction, the APB amplitude at OIPITA compared to the APB at OIPIAPB, was 32.5 +/- 27.9%. For the TA a mean amplitude reduction of 33.4 +/- 27.4% was found. The mean amplitude reduction for the OIPI amplitudes compared to the amplitudes at IPI 2 ms was 53.6 +/- 25.5% for the APB and 45.8 +/- 28.3% for the TA.</p><p>Conclusion: Large intra-and interindividual differences were found between the mean OIPIs of the TA and APB muscles (range 1.78-2.73 ms) representing the upper and lower extremity.</p><p>Significance: Based on the results of this study, it is advisable to perform a set-up procedure for each individual patient undergoing TES-MEP to determine the optimal parameter settings when using supramaximal intensity of TES. (C) 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</p>

The added value of semimicroelectrode recording in deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson disease

<p>Object. Accurate placement of the leads is crucial in deep brain stimulation (DBS). To optimize the surgical positioning of the lead, a combination of anatomical targeting on MRI, electrophysiological mapping, and clinical testing is applied during the procedure. Electrophysiological mapping is usually done with microelectrode recording (MER), but the relatively undocumented semimicroelectrode recording (SMER) is a competing alternative. In this study the added value and safety of SMER for optimal lead insertion in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in a consecutive cohort of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) was assessed.</p><p>Methods. Between 2001 and 2010, a consecutive single-center cohort of 46 patients with PD underwent DBS of the STN (85 lead insertions). After exclusion of 11 lead insertions for mostly technical reasons, 74 insertions were included for the assessment. Anatomical target localization was based on either 1.5-T MRI or fused 3-T MRI with CT, with reference to anterior commissure-posterior commissure coordinates. Electrophysiological mapping was performed with SMER. Intraoperative clinical testing was dominant in determining the final lead position. The target error was defined as the absolute distance between the anatomical or electrophysiological target and the final lead position. The effect of SMER on anatomical target error reduction and final target selection was analyzed. Also, the anatomical and electrophysiological target error was judged against the different imaging strategies. For safety evaluation, the adverse events related to all lead insertions were assessed.</p><p>Results. The use of SMER significantly reduced the anatomical target error from 1.7 (SD 1.6) mm to 0.8 (SD 1.3) mm (p <0.0001). In particular, the anatomical target error based on 1.5-T MRI was significantly reduced by SMER, from 2.3 (SD 1.5) mm to 0.1 (SD 0.5) mm (p <0.001). Anatomical target error reduction based on 3-T MRI fused with CT was not significantly influenced by SMER (p = 0.2), because the 3-T MRI-CT combination already significantly reduced the anatomical target error from 2.3 (SD 1.5) mm to 1.5 (SD 1.5) mm compared with 1.5-T MRI (p = 0.03). No symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was reported. Intracerebral infection was encountered in 1 patient following lead insertion.</p><p>Conclusions. Semimicroelectrode recording has added value in targeting the STN in DBS for patients with PD based on 1.5-T MRI. The use of SMER does not significantly reduce the anatomical target error in procedures with fused 3-T MRI-CT studies and therefore might be omitted. With the absence of hemorrhagic complications, SMER-guided lead implantation should be considered a safe alternative to MER.</p>