12 research outputs found

    Deep Neural Network with l2-norm Unit for Brain Lesions Detection

    Full text link
    Automated brain lesions detection is an important and very challenging clinical diagnostic task because the lesions have different sizes, shapes, contrasts, and locations. Deep Learning recently has shown promising progress in many application fields, which motivates us to apply this technology for such important problem. In this paper, we propose a novel and end-to-end trainable approach for brain lesions classification and detection by using deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). In order to investigate the applicability, we applied our approach on several brain diseases including high and low-grade glioma tumor, ischemic stroke, Alzheimer diseases, by which the brain Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) have been applied as an input for the analysis. We proposed a new operating unit which receives features from several projections of a subset units of the bottom layer and computes a normalized l2-norm for next layer. We evaluated the proposed approach on two different CNN architectures and number of popular benchmark datasets. The experimental results demonstrate the superior ability of the proposed approach.Comment: Accepted for presentation in ICONIP-201

    On Instrumental Variable Regression for Deep Offline Policy Evaluation

    Get PDF
    We show that the popular reinforcement learning (RL) strategy of estimating the state-action value (Q-function) by minimizing the mean squared Bellman error leads to a regression problem with confounding, the inputs and output noise being correlated. Hence, direct minimization of the Bellman error can result in significantly biased Q-function estimates. We explain why fixing the target Q-network in Deep Q-Networks and Fitted Q Evaluation provides a way of overcoming this confounding, thus shedding new light on this popular but not well understood trick in the deep RL literature. An alternative approach to address confounding is to leverage techniques developed in the causality literature, notably instrumental variables (IV). We bring together here the literature on IV and RL by investigating whether IV approaches can lead to improved Q-function estimates. This paper analyzes and compares a wide range of recent IV methods in the context of offline policy evaluation (OPE), where the goal is to estimate the value of a policy using logged data only. By applying different IV techniques to OPE, we are not only able to recover previously proposed OPE methods such as model-based techniques but also to obtain competitive new techniques. We find empirically that state-of-the-art OPE methods are closely matched in performance by some IV methods such as AGMM, which were not developed for OPE
    corecore