A thalamic reticular networking model of consciousness

<p>Abstract</p> <p>[Background]</p> <p>It is reasonable to consider the thalamus a primary candidate for the location of consciousness, given that the thalamus has been referred to as the gateway of nearly all sensory inputs to the corresponding cortical areas. Interestingly, in an early stage of brain development, communicative innervations between the dorsal thalamus and telencephalon must pass through the ventral thalamus, the major derivative of which is the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN). The TRN occupies a striking control position in the brain, sending inhibitory axons back to the thalamus, roughly to the same region where they receive afferents.</p> <p>[Hypotheses]</p> <p>The present study hypothesizes that the TRN plays a pivotal role in dynamic attention by controlling thalamocortical synchronization. The TRN is thus viewed as a functional networking filter to regulate conscious perception, which is possibly embedded in thalamocortical networks. Based on the anatomical structures and connections, modality-specific sectors of the TRN and the thalamus appear to be responsible for modality-specific perceptual representation. Furthermore, the coarsely overlapped topographic maps of the TRN appear to be associated with cross-modal or unitary conscious awareness. Throughout the latticework structure of the TRN, conscious perception could be accomplished and elaborated through accumulating intercommunicative processing across the first-order input signal and the higher-order signals from its functionally associated cortices. As the higher-order relay signals run cumulatively through the relevant thalamocortical loops, conscious awareness becomes more refined and sophisticated.</p> <p>[Conclusions]</p> <p>I propose that the thalamocortical integrative communication across first- and higher-order information circuits and repeated feedback looping may account for our conscious awareness. This TRN-modulation hypothesis for conscious awareness provides a comprehensive rationale regarding previously reported psychological phenomena and neurological symptoms such as blindsight, neglect, the priming effect, the threshold/duration problem, and TRN-impairment resembling coma. This hypothesis can be tested by neurosurgical investigations of thalamocortical loops via the TRN, while simultaneously evaluating the degree to which conscious perception depends on the severity of impairment in a TRN-modulated network.</p

The CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 impairs reconsolidation of pavlovian fear memory in the rat basolateral amygdala

We have investigated the requirement for signaling at CB1 receptors in the reconsolidation of a previously consolidated auditory fear memory, by infusing the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251, or the FAAH inhibitor URB597, directly into the basolateral amygdala (BLA) in conjunction with memory reactivation. AM251 disrupted memory restabilization, but only when administered after reactivation. URB597 produced a small, transient enhancement of memory restabilization when administered after reactivation. The amnestic effect of AM251 was rescued by coadministration of the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline at reactivation, indicating that the disruption of reconsolidation was mediated by altered GABAergic transmission in the BLA. These data show that the endocannabinoid system in the BLA is an important modulator of fear memory reconsolidation and that its effects on memory are mediated by an interaction with the GABAergic system. Thus, targeting the endocannabinoid system may have therapeutic potential to reduce the impact of maladaptive memories in neuropsychiatric disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder.This work was conducted within the Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, a joint initiative funded by the Wellcome Trust and the UK Medical Research Council, in the Department of Psychology at the University of Cambridge. This work was funded by a UK Medical Research Council programme grant (no. G1002231) awarded to BJE and ALM. PR was supported by a Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Fellowship at the Sapienza University of Rome, and an Italian Society of Pharmacology Fellowship. ALM is the Ferreras-Willetts Fellow in Neuroscience at Downing College, Cambridge. The manuscript was partly prepared while ALM was an Erskine Visiting Cambridge Fellow at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

The exploration of a new environment leads to the modulation of gene expression for prolonged times in the rat

In the present study we performed a transcriptional analysis in order to evaluate changes in gene expression induced by exploration in prolonged times. The analysis was carried out 3, 10 and 20 days after exploration. We analyzed the modulation of the expression levels of Pfn2, Casp3, Pdrg1, Pea15, Ywhaz genes which previously were found not modulated 2 days after exploration. Our data show that the expression of Pfn2, Casp3, Pdrg1, Pea15, Ywhaz genes was modulated at 10 or 20 days. The transcript, whose expression had been evaluated with the qRT-PCR, code for proteins which belong to the following functional categories: synaptic modulation, apoptosis, signal transduction. It is interesting to note that the modulation of the expression of these genes was evident some days after environmental exploration, and not previously at 2 days after conditioning as occurred after contextual fear conditioning (CFC). Hence it is possible to hypothesize that the spatial memory processes require a longer period of elaboration than the emotional ones, fundamental for the survival of the species

Modulation of gene expression in contextual fear conditioning in the rat

In contextual fear conditioning (CFC) a single training leads to long-term memory of context-aversive electrical foot-shocks association. Mid-temporal regions of the brain of trained and naive rats were obtained 2 days after conditioning and screened by two-directional suppression subtractive hybridization. A pool of differentially expressed genes was identified and some of them were randomly selected and confirmed with qRT-PCR assay. These transcripts showed high homology for rat gene sequences coding for proteins involved in different cellular processes. The expression of the selected transcripts was also tested in rats which had freely explored the experimental apparatus (exploration) and in rats to which the same number of aversive shocks had been administered in the same apparatus, but temporally compressed so as to make the association between painful stimuli and the apparatus difficult (shock-only). Some genes resulted differentially expressed only in the rats subjected to CFC, others only in exploration or shock-only rats, whereas the gene coding for translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 20 protein and nardilysin were differentially expressed in both CFC and exploration rats. For example, the expression of stathmin 1 whose transcripts resulted up regulated was also tested to evaluate the transduction and protein localization after conditioning

Contextual fear conditioning modulates the gene expression over time

Contextual fear conditioning (CFC) is a quick cognitive test based on the association context-aversive stimulus in which a single training leads to a long-term memory. Previously, we analyzed the gene expression in CFC rats, naïve rats, explor rats which had freely explored the experimental apparatus and shock only (SO) rats to which the same number of aversive shocks used in the CFC paradigm had been administered in the same CFC apparatus in less time to prevent the association between painful stimuli and apparatus. The analysis showed that 2 days after conditioning some genes (Napa, Pnf2, Casp3, Pdrg1, Ywhaz, Stmn1, Bpgm) were more expressed in CFC rats with respect to naive, explor and SO rats. Other genes (Actr3, Pea15,Tiprl) were more expressed in SO rats or in explor rats (Cplx1, Trim32, Ran), and the expression of the Tomm20 gene was greater in both CFC and explor rats in comparison with SO and naïve rats. Herein, we have tested the expression of these genes for longer periods, at 3, 10 and 20 days after conditioning. The expression of the transcripts was assessed by qRT-PCR. Interestingly, in CFC rats, at 3 days, the genes Tiprl and Trim32, whose expression had not been modulated at 2 days resulted more expressed with respect to naïve, explor and SO rats, whereas the gene Tomm20 was less expressed as in the SO and explor rats with respect to naïve rats. At 10 days, Trim32 gene was still more expressed in CFC rats whereas the genes Tiprl and Tomm20 returned to the constitutive level, and the gene Ran was significantly more expressed in CFC rats than in naïve, SO and explor rats. Surprisingly at 20 days, the genes Stmn1 and Tiprl again resulted significantly more expressed in CFC rats compared with naïve, SO and explor rats. Our results outline a complex modulation of gene expression in a prolonged time point of CFC post-acquisition consolidation period