28 research outputs found

    Characterization of the retinal proteome during rod photoreceptor genesis

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The process of rod photoreceptor genesis, cell fate determination and differentiation is complex and multi-factorial. Previous studies have defined a model of photoreceptor differentiation that relies on intrinsic changes within the presumptive photoreceptor cells as well as changes in surrounding tissue that are extrinsic to the cell. We have used a proteomics approach to identify proteins that are dynamically expressed in the mouse retina during rod genesis and differentiation.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>A series of six developmental ages from E13 to P5 were used to define changes in retinal protein expression during rod photoreceptor genesis and early differentiation. Retinal proteins were separated by isoelectric focus point and molecular weight. Gels were analyzed for changes in protein spot intensity across developmental time. Protein spots that peaked in expression at E17, P0 and P5 were picked from gels for identification. There were 239 spots that were picked for identification based on their dynamic expression during the developmental period of maximal rod photoreceptor genesis and differentiation. Of the 239 spots, 60 of them were reliably identified and represented a single protein. Ten proteins were represented by multiple spots, suggesting they were post-translationally modified. Of the 42 unique dynamically expressed proteins identified, 16 had been previously reported to be associated with the developing retina.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our results represent the first proteomics study of the developing mouse retina that includes prenatal development. We identified 26 dynamically expressed proteins in the developing mouse retina whose expression had not been previously associated with retinal development.</p

    A Non-farnesylated Ha-Ras Protein Can Be Palmitoylated and Trigger Potent Differentiation and Transformation

    Get PDF
    Ha-Ras undergoes post-translational modifications (including attachment of farnesyl and palmitate) that culminate in localization of the protein to the plasma membrane. Because palmitate is not attached without prior farnesyl addition, the distinct contributions of the two lipid modifications to membrane attachment or biological activity have been difficult to examine. To test if palmitate is able to support these crucial functions on its own, novel C-terminal mutants of Ha-Ras were constructed, retaining the natural sites for palmitoylation, but replacing the C-terminal residue of the CAAX signal for prenylation with six lysines. Both the Ext61L and ExtWT proteins were modified in a dynamic fashion by palmitate, without being farnesylated; bound to membranes modestly (40% as well as native Ha-Ras); and retained appropriate GTP binding properties. Ext61L caused potent transformation of NIH 3T3 cells and, unexpectedly, an exaggerated differentiation of PC12 cells. Ext61L with the six lysines but lacking palmitates was inactive. Thus, farnesyl is not needed as a signal for palmitate attachment or removal, and a combination of transient palmitate modification and basic residues can support Ha-Ras membrane binding and two quite different biological functions. The roles of palmitate can therefore be independent of and distinct from those of farnesyl. Reciprocally, if membrane association can be sustained largely through palmitates, farnesyl is freed to interact with other proteins

    Transforming Activity of the Rho Family GTPase, Wrch-1, a Wnt-regulated Cdc42 Homolog, Is Dependent on a Novel Carboxyl-terminal Palmitoylation Motif

    Get PDF
    Wrch-1 is a Rho family GTPase that shares strong sequence and functional similarity with Cdc42. Like Cdc42, Wrch-1 can promote anchorage-independent growth transformation. We determined that activated Wrch-1 also promoted anchorage-dependent growth transformation of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Wrch-1 contains a distinct carboxyl-terminal extension not found in Cdc42, suggesting potential differences in subcellular location and function. Consistent with this, we found that Wrch-1 associated extensively with plasma membrane and endosomes, rather than with cytosol and perinuclear membranes like Cdc42. Like Cdc42, Wrch-1 terminates in a CAAX tetrapeptide (where C is cysteine, A is aliphatic amino acid, and X is any amino acid) motif (CCFV), suggesting that Wrch-1 may be prenylated similarly to Cdc42. Most surprisingly, unlike Cdc42, Wrch-1 did not incorporate isoprenoid moieties, and Wrch-1 membrane localization was not altered by inhibitors of protein prenylation. Instead, we showed that Wrch-1 is modified by the fatty acid palmitate, and pharmacologic inhibition of protein palmitoylation caused mislocalization of Wrch-1. Most interestingly, mutation of the second cysteine of the CCFV motif (CCFV > CSFV), but not the first, abrogated both Wrch-1 membrane localization and transformation. These results suggest that Wrch-1 membrane association, subcellular localization, and biological activity are mediated by a novel membrane-targeting mechanism distinct from that of Cdc42 and other isoprenylated Rho family GTPases
    corecore