24 research outputs found
Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Beyond BTK Inhibitors
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) with historically poor outcomes. Virtually all patients will eventually experience refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease, with a virulent course of resistance and serial relapses, making treatment challenging. The available therapies for R/R MCL are not curative with conventional therapy, their goal being to palliate and prolong survival. A variety of agents approved for R/R MCL, including Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), changed the treatment landscape of R/R MCL. In the pre-BTKi era, the median progression-free survival (PFS) in R/R disease was 4–9 months. With the introduction of ibrutinib, the median PFS improved to 13–14.6 months. Despite these impressive results, the duration of response is limited, and resistance to BTKi inevitably develops in a subset of patients. Outcomes after progression on BTKi are extremely poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of 6 to 10 months. Certain therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have shown promising results after BTKi failure. The preferred combination and sequencing of therapies beyond BTKi remain unestablished and are currently being investigated. In this review, we describe the current evidence for the available treatment of R/R MCL after progression on BTKi
P545: VENETOCLAX (VEN) COMBINED WITH FLAG-IDA IS AN EFFECTIVE REGIMEN FOR PATIENTS (PTS) WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED (ND) AND RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML)
What Everybody is Doing but No One is Talking About: Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the ANCA Associated Vasculitis Population
The use and impact of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) has not been reported. AAV patients seeking care at our center inquired about CAM, prompting a formal study. Study objectives were to discern how many AAV patients used CAM and its perceived helpfulness in disease management.Methods: AAV patients completed a CAM questionnaire between July 2011 and May 2012. Patients were 18 years or older and had biopsy proven and/or clinical evidence of AAV. Medical record abstraction supplemented data. Classification detailed CAM type including “Mind†or “Mind-Bodyâ€. Perceived helpfulness of CAM was assessed as “veryâ€, “somewhat†or “not at all/don’t knowâ€.Results: A total of 107 patients participated and were a mean age of 53 (range: 18-85), 62% female; 48% proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA, 44% myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA and 8% ANCA-negative. Top organs involved included kidney (87%), joints (55%), lung (53%) and upper respiratory (53%).At least one type of CAM treatment or self-help practice was reported by 81% of study participants, with the most frequent being prayer (64%), exercise (27%) and massage therapy (19%). Mind-based practices were used by 28% (excluding prayer) and Mind-Body practices by 14%. Most practices were used to improve wellbeing, and Mind and Mind-Body were deemed very helpful by 83% and 87% respectively. Only 24% of study participants discussed CAM with their physician.Conclusion: CAM practices were commonly used to improve well-being and found to be beneficial among AAV patients, but more open discussion is needed about CAM between physicians and patients
P489: PROGNOSTIC IMPACT OF “MULTI-HIT” VERSUS “SINGLE-HIT” TP53 MUTATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA: RESULTS FROM THE CONSORTIUM ON MYELOID MALIGNANCIES AND NEOPLASTIC DISEASES (COMMAND)
Recommended from our members
Outcomes of Patients with Accelerated/Blast-Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in the Current Era of Myeloid Therapies
Impact of initial chemotherapy regimen on outcomes for patients with double- expressor lymphoma: A multi- center analysis
Diffuse large B- cell lymphoma featuring overexpression of MYC and B- Cell Lymphoma 2 (double expressor lymphoma, DEL) is associated with poor outcomes. Existing evidence suggesting improved outcomes for DEL with the use of more intensive regimens than R- CHOP is restricted to younger patients and based on limited evidence from low patient numbers. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of intensive frontline regimens versus R- CHOP in a multicenter analysis across 7 academic medical centers in the United States. We collected 90 cases of DEL, 46 out of 90 patients (51%) received R- CHOP and 44/90 (49%) received an intensive regimen, which was predominantly DA- EPOCH- R. Treatment cohorts were evenly balanced for demographics and disease characteristics, though the intensive group had a higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, 326 vs. 230 U/L p = 0.06) and presence of B- symptoms (50% vs. 22%, p = 0.01) compared to the R- CHOP cohort. There was no difference in PFS (median 53 vs. 38 months, p = 0.49) or overall survival (67 vs. not reached months, p = 0.14) between the R- CHOP and intensive therapy cohorts, respectively. On multivariate analysis, intensive therapy was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.35 (95% CI 0.74- 7.41), though this was not statistically significant. Additionally, a subgroup analysis of intermediate high- risk lymphoma defined by IPI - ¥3 did not identify a difference in survival outcomes between regimens. We conclude that in our multi- center cohort there is no evidence supporting the use of intensive regimens over R- CHOP, suggesting that R- CHOP remains the standard of care for treating DEL.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170812/1/hon2902.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170812/2/hon2902_am.pd
Recommended from our members
Outcomes of Patients with Accelerated/Blast-Phase MPNs That Received Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplant in the Current Era of Myeloid Therapies
Background Patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) that progress to an accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) have a median overall survival (mOS) of less than 1 year (Odenike, Blood 2018; Tam et al, JCO 2009). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) is the only curative approach for MPN-AP/BP, but mOS remains about a year for pts with MPN-BP that undergo allo-HCT (2005-2019) (Orti et al, AJH 2023). We previously reported on outcomes of pts with MPN-AP/BP treated in the current era of myeloid therapies (2017 onward) and found a mOS of 0.73 years in a multi-center cohort of 80 pts (Patel et al, ASH 2022). We aim to characterize treatment patterns and outcomes of pts with MPN-AP/BP that underwent allo-HCT via a multi-center retrospective analysis. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed at 8 institutions to identify pts with pathology-confirmed Ph-neg MPN-AP/BP diagnosed in 2017 or later. All patients that met inclusion criteria were included. Response was assessed using 2017 European Leukemia Net AML (2017 ELN) criteria (Dohner et al, Blood 2017). OS from diagnosis of MPN-AP/BP and from time of allo-HCT was calculated utilizing Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results The full MPN-AP/BP cohort consists of 180 pts. This analysis includes 58 pts that underwent allo-HCT for MPN-AP/BP across 8 institutions. Median age at MPN-AP/BP diagnosiswas 64 years. The most common therapies for chronic-phase MPN included hydroxyurea (55%), JAK inhibitor (JAKi) (26%), interferon (9%), and hypomethylating agent (HMA, 4%). No patient previously received allo-HCT for chronic-phase MPN. Driver mutations included JAK2 (60%), CALR (22%), MPL (10%), but some pts had triple-negative disease (7%). Sixty-two percent of pts had high-risk disease by 2017 ELN criteria. Forty-four pts had next-generation sequencing performed at time of MPN-AP/BP diagnosis. The most frequently co-occurring mutations detected at time of MPN-AP/BP diagnosis were ASXL1 (30%), SRSF2 (23%), RUNX1 (23%), TP53 (18%), TET2 (16%), IDH2 (11%), U2AF1 (7%), EZH2 (7%), and IDH1 (9%). Additional characteristics are in Table 1. One pt proceeded directly to allo-HCT at time of MPN-AP/BP diagnosis. Frontline therapies (1L) for MPN-AP included intensive chemotherapy (IC) (n=26), hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (VEN) (n=16), HMA monotherapy (n=14), and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) + VEN + JAKi (n=1). Responses are summarized in Table 2A. Thirty-seven pts proceeded to allo-HCT after 1L therapy (17 after IC, 10 after HMA+VEN, 9 after HMA, 1 after LDAC+VEN+JAKi). Twenty pts proceeded to allo-HCT after 2 nd-line and beyond (2L+) therapies. Therapies utilized and responses are summarized in Table 2B. Transplant-specific characteristics include 15 pts receiving myeloablative conditioning while 43 received reduced-intensity conditioning. Donor source was matched unrelated donor for 33 pts, haploidentical donor for 10 pts, matched related donor for 9 patients, mismatched unrelated donor for 5 patients, and cord blood for 1 patient. Twenty-two pts developed acute GVHD while 15 developed chronic GVHD. Amongst the 58 pts that underwent allo-HCT, 19 had relapse of disease and 8 patients received treatment after relapse. Amongst the full cohort of 180 patients, mOS was 0.72 years from time of MPN-AP/BP diagnosis. The mOS for the 58 pts that underwent allo-HCT was 1.82 years from time of MPN-AP/BP diagnosis and 1.30 years from time of allo-HCT. Survival analysis by initial MPN-AP/BP therapy demonstrated a mOS from time of MPN-AP/BP diagnosis of 1.9 years for HMA-based therapy, 1.9 years for HMA + VEN, and 1.5 years for IC ( p=0.006). We also analyzed mOS by disease status prior to transplant. Thirty-four pts had a complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) with mOS of 1.7 years from time of allo-HCT, 12 pts with a partial response (PR) or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) had mOS of 1.8 years, and 11 pts with treatment failure (TF) had mOS of 0.47 years (p=0.82). Conclusions Our cohort of 180 pts with MPN-AP/BP treated in the current era of myeloid therapies had limited survival with a mOS of 0.72 years from MPN-AP/BP diagnosis. Amongst the 58 pts that underwent allo-HCT the mOS was 1.82 years with longer mOS seen in pts that received HMA or HMA + VEN as their 1L therapy when compared to IC. This underscores the need for novel management strategies even in pts eligible for allo-HCT
Structural racism is a mediator of disparities in acute myeloid leukemia outcomes
Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have higher mortality rates than non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients despite more favorable genetics and younger age. A discrete survival analysis was performed on 822 adult AML patients from six urban cancer centers and revealed inferior survival among NHB (HR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.22) and Hispanic (HR=1.25, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.79) compared to NHW patients. A multilevel analysis of disparities was then conducted to investigate the contribution of neighborhood measures of structural racism on racial/ethnic differences in survival. Census tract disadvantage and affluence scores were individually calculated. Mediation analysis of hazard of leukemia death between groups was examined across six composite variables: structural racism (census tract disadvantage, affluence and segregation), tumor biology (ELN risk and secondary leukemia), health care access (insurance and clinical trial enrollment), comorbidities, treatment patterns (induction intensity and transplant utilization) and ICU admission during intensive chemotherapy. Strikingly, census tract measures accounted for nearly all of the NHB-NHW and Hispanic-NHW disparity in leukemia death. Treatment patterns, including induction intensity and allogeneic transplant, as well as treatment complications, as assessed by ICU admission during induction chemotherapy, were additional mediators of survival disparities in AML. This is the first study to formally test mediators for observed disparities in AML survival and highlights the need to investigate the mechanisms by which structural racism interacts with known prognostic and treatment factors to influence leukemia outcomes
Epitope specificity determines pathogenicity and detectability in ANCA-associated vasculitis
<p>Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated (ANCA-associated) small vessel necrotizing vasculitis is caused by immune-mediated inflammation of the vessel wall and is diagnosed in some cases by the presence of myeloperoxidase-specific antibodies (MPO-ANCA). This multicenter study sought to determine whether differences in ANCA epitope specificity explain why, in some cases, conventional serologic assays do not correlate with disease activity, why naturally occurring anti-MPO autoantibodies can exist in disease-free individuals, and why ANCA are undetected in patients with ANCA-negative disease. Autoantibodies from human and murine samples were epitope mapped using a highly sensitive epitope excision/mass spectrometry approach. Data indicated that MPO autoantibodies from healthy individuals had epitope specificities different from those present in ANCA disease. Importantly, this methodology led to the discovery of MPO-ANCA in ANCA-negative disease that reacted against a sole linear sequence. Autoantibodies against this epitope had pathogenic properties, as demonstrated by their capacity to activate neutrophils in vitro and to induce nephritis in mice. The confounder for serological detection of these autoantibodies was the presence of a fragment of ceruloplasmin in serum, which was eliminated in purified IgG, allowing detection. These findings implicate immunodominant epitopes in the pathology of ANCA-associated vasculitis and suggest that autoantibody diversity may be common to other autoimmune diseases.</p>
Recommended from our members
Treatment approach and outcomes of patients with accelerated/blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms in the current era
Progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to accelerated or blast-phase is associated with poor survival outcomes. Since 2017 there have been several therapies approved for use in acute myeloid leukemia (AML); these therapies have been incorporated into the management of accelerated/blast-phase MPNs (MPN-AP/BP). We performed a multi-center analysis to investigate outcomes of patients diagnosed with MPN-AP/BP in 2017 or later. Two-hundred two patients were identified; median overall survival (OS) was 0.86 years. We also analyzed patients based on first-line treatment; the three most common approaches were intensive chemotherapy (IC) (n=65), DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMTi)-based regimens (n=65), and DNMTi + venetoclax (VEN)-based regimens (n=54). Median OS was not significantly different by treatment type. In addition, we evaluated response by 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) AML criteria and 2012 MPN-BP criteria in an effort to understand the association of response with survival outcomes. We also analyzed outcomes in 65 patients that received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT); median OS was 2.30 years from time of allo-HCT. Our study demonstrates that survival amongst patients with MPN-AP/BP is limited in the absence of allo-HCT even in the current era of therapeutics and underscores the urgent need for new agents and approaches