The Sequence of Delta24-RGD and TMZ Administration in Malignant Glioma Affects the Role of CD8+T Cell Anti-tumor Activity

The conditionally replicating oncolytic adenovirus Delta24-RGD (Ad) is currently under investigation in clinical trials for glioblastoma, including in combination with temozolomide (TMZ), the standard chemotherapy for this tumor. Previously, we showed that the efficacy of Delta24-RGD in a murine model is primarily dependent on the virus-induced anti-tumor immune response. As observed with most chemotherapies, TMZ has pronounced immune-modulating effects. Here, we studied the combined effects of these treatments in a murine glioma model. In vitro, we observed a synergistic activity between Delta24-RGD and TMZ. In vivo, C57BL/6 mice bearing intracranial GL261 tumors were treated with TMZ for 5 days either prior to intratumoral Delta24-RGD injection (TMZ/Ad) or post virus injection (Ad/TMZ). Notably, the Ad/TMZ regimen led to similar tumoral CD8+ T cell influx as the virus-only treatment, but increased the ability of CD8+ T cells to specifically recognize the tumor cells. This was accompanied by improved survival. The TMZ/Ad regimen also improved survival significantly compared to controls, but not compared to virus alone. In this group, the influx of dendritic cells is impaired, followed by a significantly lower number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and no recognition of tumor cells. Depletion of either CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cells impaired the efficacy of Delta24-RGD, underscoring the role of these cells in therapeutic activity of the virus. Overall, we show that the addition of TMZ to Delta24-RGD treatment leads to a significant increase in survival and that the order of sequence of these treatments affects the CD8+T cell anti-tumor activity

Evaluation of the analytical performance of the new Abbott RealTime RT-PCRs for the quantitative detection of HCV and HIV-1 RNA

BACKGROUND: Despite FDA approval and CE marking of commercial tests, manufacturer independent testing of technical aspects is important. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the analytical performance of the new Abbott RealTime HCV and HIV-1 viral load tests. STUDY DESIGN: Sensitivity, specificity and inter-/intra-assay variation were investigated. The HCV and HIV-1 assays were compared with Siemens bDNA 3.0 and Roche Cobas Monitor 2.0, respectively, on diagnostic samples. RESULTS: Lower isolation volumes on the M1000 gave minor but statistically significant lower quantitative values. Minor differences were observed in the lower limit of detection relative to the specification given by the manufacturer. Inter-/intra-assay coefficients of variations ranged from 0.31 to 4.75 between 5.0 x 10(4) and 5.0 x 10(2) copies/mL. Both the HCV and HIV-1 Abbott RealTime tests did not show a geno-/sub-type dependent under-quantification on WHO reference panels, quality control panels or clinical specimens. The Abbott RealTime HIV-1 viral load assay detected subtype O whereas several other systems failed to detect this subtype. CONCLUSION: The technical aspects of the HCV and HIV-1 RealTime viral load assays on the M2000 system make it attractive for use in routine diagnostic settings

Comparison of reverse hybridization, microarray, and sequence analysis for genotyping hepatitis B virus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotyping has become important in epidemiological and clinical diagnoses, given the relationship between the viral genotype and the progression of disease or the appearance of antiviral resistance. Since genotyping by sequence and phylogenetic analyses is not convenient in the clinical setting, we evaluated InnoLipa HBV genotyping (Innogenetics, Belgium) and an HBV DNA-Chip (bioMerieux, France) prototype assay and compared their sequencing of the gold standard S gene, using a cohort of 275 individual patient samples. All but two samples, belonging to distant and individual subgroups within a single genotype, were detected by InnoLipa HBV assay. Four samples with dual infections belonging to genotypes A and G were identified only by InnoLipa HBV assay. Using an HBV DNA-Chip assay, one sample could not be amplified due to a low viral load. Four samples were identified as genotype C and two as genotype D by sequencing but were classified as genotype A (two samples) and D (two samples) and as A (one sample) and G (one sample) by the DNA-Chip assay. In conclusion, the InnoLipa HBV genotyping strip assay detected dual infections and was an easy and quick tool for genotyping, with a sensitivity of 99.3% and a specificity of 100% compared to sequence analysis. HBV DNA-Chip assay showed a sensitivity and specificity of 97.5 and 97.8%, respectively. Copyrigh