La culture matérielle, la numérisation et le problème de l’artefact

La culture matérielle, la numérisation et le problème de l’artefact. Les récentes innovations dans le domaine de la numérisation de la fabrication d’objets posent de nouvelles questions concernant notre conception de la nature de l’artefact. Elles posent également la question de l’élargissement de notre conception de la culture matérielle. Cet article a pour objet d’examiner l’émergence de la Fabrication rapide dans le domaine du Prototypage rapide, ce qui permettra d’appréhender la question de la numérisation et, plus généralement, notre conception de la culture matérielle. Étant donné qu’il s’agit d’une technologie fondée sur le concept de prototype, je la mettrai en parallèle avec une conception plus ancienne de prototype, à savoir le prototype chrétien, dans le but d’aborder les questions plus larges de matérialité et de présentification dans le cadre de ces deux technologies qui sont apparues au début et à la fin de l’ère chrétienne. Mon propos se focalisera plus particulièrement sur la question de l’immatériel, qui est au cœur des deux technologies du prototype, et sur la façon dont une technologie particulière de présentification liée à certaines conceptions de l’immatérialité exemplifie les dualismes productifs nécessaires à la structure de la vie sociale (Miller 2005).Material Culture, Digitization and the Problem of the Artefact. Recent innovations in the digitization of manufacturing have posed new problems for how we understand the nature of the artefact and the way material culture might be conceived more broadly. In this paper I want to address the emergence of Rapid Manufacturing from the area of Rapid Prototyping to consider the question of digitisation and our understandings of material culture more broadly. As this is a technology based on the concept of the prototype I want to consider it alongside a more ancient technology of the prototype, that is the Christian Prototype to engage larger questions of materiality and presencing that the two technologies address and which have emerged at the beginning and end of our Common Era. In particular I want to focus on the question of the immaterial which is at the heart of both technologies of the prototype and how a particular technology of presencing dependant on contingent understandings of the immaterial construct the productive dualisms necessary for the structure of social life (Miller 2005)

The Narkomfin Communal House, Moscow : the material culture of accommodation and resistance (1930-1991)

This thesis was digitised by the British Library from microfilm. You can acquire a single copy of this thesis for research purposes by clicking on the padlock icon on the thesis file. Please be aware that the text in the supplied thesis pdf file may not be as clear as text in a thesis that was born digital or digitised directly from paper due to the conversion in format. However, all of the theses in Apollo that were digitised from microfilm are readable and have been processed by optical character recognition (OCR) technology which means the reader can search and find text within the document. If you are the author of this thesis and would like to make your work openly available, please contact us: [email protected]

An archaeology of socialism /

Includes bibliographical references (p. 209-218) and index

Is Active Impedance the Key to a Breakthrough for Legged Robots?

ISSN:1610-743

Towards versatile legged robots through active impedance control

ISSN:0278-3649ISSN:1741-317