976-14 Immediate Heart Rate Response to Orthostatic Stress During β-blocker Therapy for Vasodepressor Syncope

Although β-blockers are preferred agents for therapy of vasodepressor syncope (VDS), they are not uniformly effective and their mechanism of action is incompletely understood. Since we have previously shown a differential therapeutic response to β-blocker therapy between pts with isoproterenol-independent [iso(-)] and isoproterenol-dependent [iso(+)] VDS during tilt table testing we sought to determine whether this was due to a differential heart rate (HR) response to orthostasis during β-blockade. We therefore examined immediate HR and blood pressure responses to upright tilt before and after initiation of therapy with atenolol (12.5–50mg daily) in 62 pts with VDS and positive tilt tests. The protocol comprised upright tilt (60°) for up to 60min followed by repeat tilt for 15min during isoproterenol (iso) infusion. Supine HR, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP) were determined as the mean of 3 consecutive 1-min samples during supine rest; orthostatic HR, MAP, and PP were the mean of the samples recorded in the first 3min after upright tilt (before infusion of iso). Response to atenolol required completion of tilt with and without infusion of iso. There were 15 iso(-) pts and 47 iso(+) pts. The groups did not differ significantly in blood pressure response (MAP, PP) to orthostasis. Supine HR fell and the ΔHR in response to orthostasis was blunted during therapy in both groups:Baseline (Mean ± SD)Rx (Mean ± SD)Iso(+)Iso(-)pIso(+)Iso(-)pSupine HR69±1368±9NS57±958±8NSOrthostatic ΔHR8±712±9NS3±53±4NS11 iso(-) pts (73%) had a therapeutic response to β-blockade compared with 46 iso(+) pts (98%, p=0.01); the orthostatic ΔHR in the iso(-) pts who failed β-blocker therapy was no different from the response in the patients with a therapeutic response.ConclusionsThe HR response to orthostasis is comparably blunted after β-blockade in pts with iso(-) and iso(+) VDS, indicating that failure to respond is not due to inadequate β-blockade and suggests that in some pts iso-independent VDS may be independent of a cardiac β1 receptor mediated mechanism

Safety of Coronary Reactivity Testing in Women With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Results From the NHLBI-Sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) Study

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the safety of coronary reactivity testing (CRT) in symptomatic women with evidence of myocardial ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundMicrovascular coronary dysfunction (MCD) in women with no obstructive CAD portends an adverse prognosis of a 2.5% annual major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate. The diagnosis of MCD is established by invasive CRT, yet the risk of CRT is unknown.MethodsThe authors evaluated 293 symptomatic women with ischemia and no obstructive CAD, who underwent CRT at 3 experienced centers. Microvascular function was assessed using a Doppler wire and injections of adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitroglycerin into the left coronary artery. CRT-related serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs), and follow-up MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) were recorded.ResultsCRT-SAEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) during the procedure: 1 had coronary artery dissection, and 1 developed MI associated with coronary spasm. CRT-AEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) and included 1 transient air microembolism and 1 deep venous thrombosis. There was no CRT-related mortality. In the mean follow-up period of 5.4 years, the MACE rate was 8.2%, including 5 deaths (1.7%), 8 nonfatal MIs (2.7%), 8 nonfatal strokes (2.7%), and 11 hospitalizations for heart failure (3.8%).ConclusionsIn women undergoing CRT for suspected MCD, contemporary testing carries a relatively low risk compared with the MACE rate in these women. These results support the use of CRT by experienced operators for establishing definitive diagnosis and assessing prognosis in this at-risk population. (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE]; NCT00832702

Expanding Economic Opportunity for More Americans: Bipartisan Policies to Increase Work, Wages, and Skills

Many workers today find themselves lacking the skills and training necessary to thrive in the modern economy. Most low- and middle-income workers have not seen meaningful wage increases in many years. Millions of men and women are missing from the workforce altogether. These challenges stem from profound shifts in the American economy and necessitate a dedicated policy response.Over the course of the past year, the Aspen Economic Strategy Group collected policy ideas to address the barriers to broad-based economic opportunity and identified concrete proposals with bipartisan appeal. These proposals are presented here

Helping the Working Poor: Employer- vs. Employee-Based Subsidies

In the United States and Europe there has been renewed interest in subsidizing firms that employ disadvantaged workers as a means of addressing poverty and other social problems. In contrast, the prevailing practice is largely to provide social welfare benefits directly to individuals. Which approach is better? We re-examine the relative merits of employee- versus employer-based labor market subsidies and conclude there are good reasons to continue to rely on the direct, employee-based approach. In practice, low-wage workers are seldom either low-skill or low-income workers. Furthermore, workers who might quality for a firm-based subsidy are reluctant to so identify themselves for fear of being stigmatized or labeled as needy. Thus, employer-based subsidy programs have lower participation rates and correspondingly higher per capita expenditures than employee-based subsidy programs