Interference of bovine hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier-201 (Hemopure) on four hematology analyzers

Introduction: Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers, for example HBOC-201 (Hemopure), are aimed to bridge acute anemia when blood transfusion is not available or refused by the patient. However, since HBOC-201 appears free in plasma, it interferes with laboratory tests. This study presents an overview of HBOC-201 interference on four commonly used hematology analyzers and suggests treatment monitoring possibilities. Methods: Blood samples were spiked with therapeutic doses of HBOC-201 and nine hematology parameters were measured with the Sysmex XN-20, Siemens Advia 2120i, Abbott Alinity Hq and Abbot Cell Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers. The results were compared to control samples and the bias was determined. Results: Most parameters, including all cell counts, hematocrit and MCV, showed a non-significant bias compared to control. However, the standard, total hemoglobin (Hb) measurement as well as MCH and MCHC showed poor agreement with control, as HBOC-201 was included in this measurement. Yet, the flow cytometry-based Hb method quantified intracellular Hb in spiked samples, excluding HBOC-201. Conclusion: Of all included hematology parameters, only total Hb and the associated MCH and MCHC suffered from interference. In contrast, the flow cytometry-based Hb measurement provided an accurate measure of intracellular Hb. The difference between total Hb and cellular Hb represents the HBOC-201 concentration and can be used to monitor HBOC-201 treatment.</p

Interference of bovine hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier-201 (Hemopure) on four hematology analyzers

Introduction: Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers, for example HBOC-201 (Hemopure), are aimed to bridge acute anemia when blood transfusion is not available or refused by the patient. However, since HBOC-201 appears free in plasma, it interferes with laboratory tests. This study presents an overview of HBOC-201 interference on four commonly used hematology analyzers and suggests treatment monitoring possibilities. Methods: Blood samples were spiked with therapeutic doses of HBOC-201 and nine hematology parameters were measured with the Sysmex XN-20, Siemens Advia 2120i, Abbott Alinity Hq and Abbot Cell Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers. The results were compared to control samples and the bias was determined. Results: Most parameters, including all cell counts, hematocrit and MCV, showed a non-significant bias compared to control. However, the standard, total hemoglobin (Hb) measurement as well as MCH and MCHC showed poor agreement with control, as HBOC-201 was included in this measurement. Yet, the flow cytometry-based Hb method quantified intracellular Hb in spiked samples, excluding HBOC-201. Conclusion: Of all included hematology parameters, only total Hb and the associated MCH and MCHC suffered from interference. In contrast, the flow cytometry-based Hb measurement provided an accurate measure of intracellular Hb. The difference between total Hb and cellular Hb represents the HBOC-201 concentration and can be used to monitor HBOC-201 treatment