Fecal continence for solid and liquid stool:The function of the anal-external sphincter continence reflex and the puborectal continence reflex

BACKGROUND: The anal-external sphincter continence reflex and the puborectal continence reflex control fecal continence by involuntary contractions of the external anal sphincter and puborectal muscle. To date it is unknown what the effect of liquid stool is on these reflexes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the consequence of liquid stool on the presence and function of these fecal continence reflexes. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Groningen. PATIENTS: Forty-two healthy subjects were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pressure changes at the level of the external anal sphincter and the puborectal muscle during the anorectal pressure test used to measure voluntary contractions, the balloon retention test used to measure involuntary contractions mimicking solid stool, and the rectal infusion test used to investigate the effect of only water mimicking liquid stool were measured. RESULTS: During the test mimicking solid stool, the pressure at the level of the external anal sphincter increased from the start to the end (132 ± 54 vs 198 ± 69 mm Hg; p < 0.001). The pressure at the level of the puborectal muscle increased simultaneously (30 ± 9 vs 176 ± 52 mm Hg; p < 0.001). After injecting water into the rectum, mimicking liquid stool, we observed immediate activation of the anal-external sphincter continence reflex (87 ± 32 vs 145 ± 36 mm Hg; p < 0.001); this was after a median 30 seconds, whereas no activation of the puborectal continence reflex appeared (26 ± 9 vs 26 ± 7 mm Hg; p = 0.655). LIMITATIONS: We only performed anorectal function tests mimicking 2 types of stool consistencies, namely water and solid. CONCLUSIONS: The anal-external sphincter continence reflex controls fecal continence of both solid and liquid stool. Contrarily, the puborectal continence reflex contributes to solid stool continence only. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B286

Prevalence of Defecation Disorders and their Symptoms is Comparable in Children and Young Adults:Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose: We aimed to compare the prevalence rates and associated symptoms of constipation and fecal incontinence in children and young adults and evaluate how these patient groups cope with these disorders. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in which 212 children (8-17 years) and 149 young adults (18-29 years) from the general Dutch population completed a questionnaire about defecation disorders. Results: Constipation occurred in 15.6% of children and 22.8% of young adults (p=0.55), while the prevalence of fecal incontinence was comparable between groups (7%, p=0.91). The symptoms associated with constipation occurred as often in children as in young adults, while most fecal incontinence symptoms occurred more often in young adults. Approximately 43% of children had constipation for more than 5 years, while 26% of young adults experienced constipation since childhood. Only 27% of constipated children and 21% of constipated young adults received treatment (mostly laxatives). For fecal incontinence, 13% of children and 36% of young adults received treatment (mostly antidiarrheal medications or incontinence pads). Conclusion: In contrast to the general belief, the prevalence of defecation disorders and associated symptoms seem to be comparable in children and young adults. Only a few people with defecation disorders receive adequate treatment

Fecal continence outcomes are associated with the type, height, and stage procedure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Purpose This study aims to analyze the quality of life in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and to investigate the association between height and type of the anastomosis, the number of stage procedures and age, and the fecal continence outcomes. Methods This is a cross-sectional retrospective study in patients who had undergone IPAA between 1992 and 2016 (N = 133). We sent questionnaires to 102 eligible patients (64% response rate). We used the Wexner score to assess fecal incontinence: 0 = no incontinence to 20 = complete incontinence. We used RAND-36 to measure quality of life. Results Patients who underwent mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomoses (n = 11, 17%) had significantly higher median Wexner scores than patients with stapled anastomoses (10 versus 3, P = 0.003). Lower anastomoses correlated significantly with increasing Wexner scores (r = - 0.468, P <0.001). Quality of life of incontinent patients was diminished. Patients who were older at the time of IPAA surgery had higher Wexner scores (P = 0.004), while the time between surgery and questionnaire did not influence their Wexner scores (P = 0.810). Considering the stage procedures, multiple linear regression showed that the two-stage procedure without diverting ileostomy was significantly associated with higher Wexner scores (B = 0.815, P = 0.02), adjusted for sex (P = 0.008) and anastomosis type (P = 0.002). The three-stage procedure showed equally low complications and anastomotic leakage rates. Conclusion Mucosectomy with more distal, hand-sewn anastomosis and increasing age at IPAA surgery was associated with poorer fecal continence outcomes. The three-stage procedure appears to give the best fecal continence results without increasing complications. Furthermore, incontinence reduced patient's quality of life

Persistence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in pig herds over a two year period

Aim of this study was to determine if a known MRSA contamination within a pig herd could persist for a period of two years. Material and Methods: 16 pig herds with a known MRSA contamination were asked to participate in this study. Per herd, five dust swabs (Sodibox®) were collected every two months for a period of two years. Samples were tested for presence of MRSA by culture and two PCR’s for confirmation of MRSA. Isolates were typed by spa- en MLVA-typing

The puborectal continence reflex functions independently of the pudendal nerve

Aim The ability of patients with poor pudendal nerve function to voluntarily contract their external anal sphincter is limited. However, it is not known whether the condition of the pudendal nerve influences voluntary puborectal muscle contraction. Recently, we described the puborectal continence reflex that maintains faecal continence by involuntary contractions of the puborectal muscle. We aim to investigate whether both voluntary and involuntary contractions of the puborectal muscle are influenced by the condition of the pudendal nerve. Method We retrospectively analysed 129 adult patients who underwent anorectal function tests at the Anorectal Physiology Laboratory. Anal electrosensitivity was used as a measurement of the pudendal nerve function. Voluntary and involuntary contractions of the puborectal muscle were defined as maximum puborectal muscle contractility and maximum pressure at the level of the puborectal muscle during the balloon retention test. Results Voluntary contraction of the puborectal muscle was significantly decreased in patients with pudendal nerve damage (P = 0.002). Involuntary contractions, however, were not associated with the condition of the pudendal nerve (P = 0.63). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the condition of the pudendal nerve and patients' sex significantly predicted voluntary contraction but not involuntary contraction. Conclusion Voluntary contractions of the puborectal muscle are significantly decreased in patients with pudendal nerve damage, while involuntary contractions of the puborectal muscle are comparable to those of patients without nerve damage. We conclude that the puborectal continence reflex, which controls involuntary contractions of the puborectal muscle, is not regulated by the pudendal nerve

Functional outcomes of surgery for colon cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: As survival rates of colon cancer increase, knowledge about functional outcomes is becoming ever more important. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify functional outcomes after surgery for colon cancer. Secondly, we aimed to determine the effect of time to follow-up and type of colectomy on postoperative functional outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting bowel function following surgery for colon cancer. Outcome parameters were bowel function scores and/or prevalence of bowel symptoms. Additionally, the effect of time to follow-up and type of resection was analyzed. Results: In total 26 studies were included, describing bowel function between 3 to 178 months following right hemicolectomy (n = 4207), left hemicolectomy/sigmoid colon resection (n = 4211), and subtotal/total colectomy (n = 161). In 16 studies (61.5%) a bowel function score was used. Pooled prevalence for liquid and solid stool incontinence was 24.1% and 6.9%, respectively. The most prevalent constipation-associated symptoms were incomplete evacuation and obstructive, difficult emptying (33.3% and 31.4%, respectively). Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome was present in 21.1%. No differences between time to follow-up or type of colectomy were found. Conclusion: Bowel function problems following surgery for colon cancer are common, show no improvement over time and do not depend on the type of colectomy. Apart from fecal incontinence, constipation-associated symptoms are also highly prevalent. Therefore, more attention should be paid to all possible aspects of bowel dysfunction following surgery for colon cancer and targeted treatment should commence promptly

The puborectal continence reflex:A new regulatory mechanism controlling fecal continence

Fecal continence is maintained by voluntary and involuntary contraction of the anal sphincter, and voluntary contractions of puborectal muscle. We investigated whether the puborectal muscle can control fecal continence not only by voluntary contractions but also by involuntary contractions. We performed anorectal function tests in 23 healthy subjects. The anorectal pressure test was used to investigate voluntary contractions of the puborectal muscle. The balloon retention test was used to assess if the puborectal muscle can contract involuntarily. During the balloon retention test, we observed an involuntary contraction of the puborectal muscle, which gradually increased during progressive filling of the rectum. The maximal involuntary contraction of the puborectal muscle was significantly stronger and longer than its maximal voluntary contraction (150 versus 70 mmHg, P <0.001 and 5.8 versus 1.5 min, P <0.001). We found that the puborectal muscle is able to contract involuntarily during rectal dilatation. It is a new regulatory mechanism, called the puborectal continence reflex, which controls fecal continence by involuntary contraction of the puborectal muscle. It seems to be initiated by dilatation at the level of the puborectal muscle. Presumably, the puborectal continence reflex protects many patients with anal sphincter dysfunctions from fecal incontinence

Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels

Objective: Making an informed decision about colorectal cancer screening requires health literacy. Our aim was to develop and pilot-test a computer-based decision aid to support informed decision making about whether or not to participate in colorectal cancer screening for individuals with varying health literacy levels in the Netherlands. Methods: First, we designed and adapted the decision aid prototype among 25 individuals with low (n = 10) and adequate (n = 15) health literacy. Second, we used a before/after study to assess changes in knowledge, attitude, intention, decisional conflict, deliberation, anxiety and risk perception in an online survey among 81 individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening with low (n = 35) and adequate (n = 46) health literacy. Results: The decision aid was acceptable, comprehensible, reduced decisional conflict, increased deliberation and improved knowledge about colorectal cancer screening, but not about colorectal cancer, among individuals with adequate and low health literacy. Usability was slightly higher for participants with adequate health literacy compared to those with low health literacy. Conclusion: The decision aid is promising in supporting informed decision making about colorectal cancer screening, also among individuals with lower health literacy. Practice implications: Further refinement of interactive features, such as videos, animations and the values clarification exercise, is needed to increase the usability of the decision aid