The Effects of Guided Reading in a Primary Montessori Classroom

The purpose of this action research was to decide if conducting guided reading instruction three times a week in a primary Montessori classroom would make an impact on reading levels among kindergarten students. The research took place over six weeks in a public Montessori school. The school is a Title One school located in a rural area of South Carolina. The population who participated in the study were 26 kindergarten students aged five to six from three different classrooms. Our intervention included using a variety of reading strategies such as pointing to each word, using picture clues, sounding out words, and recognizing sight words. Each session lasted around 45 minutes to an hour. Some positive effects of our study were an increase in reading confidence, usage of reading strategies, and overall reading achievement. To expand on our research, we would experiment with implementing this practice at another time during the school day and use additional guided reading techniques

Reviews

Introduction to the Law of Employment, Industrial Relations: a Social Psychological Approach, New Zealand and the World: Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Rosenberg, Studies in Conflict: Cases in New Zealand Industrial Relations, Labour Market Economics, The Changing Contours of British Industrial Relations, Workers' Co-operatives: Jobs and Dreams, The Right to Strike, Work and People - an Economic Evaluation of Job Enrichmen

Raising voice: securing a livelihood : the role of diverse voices in developing secure livelihoods in pastoralist areas in Ethiopia

Mary Ann Brocklesby; Mary Hoble

Community development in sustainable livelihoods approaches: an introduction

This article introduces sustainable livelihoods approaches, explaining what they are and how they have emerged. It examines how different organizations have taken up a sustainable livelihoods approach, and considers whether in so doing they have drawn on community development thinking and practice. It is found that community development is largely absent from sustainable livelihoods thinking and contended that part of the reason lies with the locally situated character of community development practice, which makes it difficult for externally driven sustainable livelihoods interventions to systematically incorporate community-level methods and practices. More fundamentally, sustainable livelihoods approaches embody a technocratic development drive, which is at odds with the principles, ethos and values that underpin much development work