Revue des revues

Cardon Dominique, Coulouarn Tangui, Delmas Corinne, Dulong Delphine, Foret François, Gaïti Brigitte, Godmer Laurent, Guionnet Christine, Kaciaf Nicolas, Legavre Jean-Baptiste, Taiclet Anne-France, Verrier Benoît. Revue des revues. In: Politix, vol. 14, n°55, Troisième trimestre 2001. Analyses politiques allemandes, sous la direction de Fabien Jobard et Pascale Laborier. pp. 195-215

Revue des revues

Cardon Dominique, Coulouarn Tangui, Delmas Corinne, Dulong Delphine, Foret François, Gaïti Brigitte, Godmer Laurent, Guionnet Christine, Kaciaf Nicolas, Legavre Jean-Baptiste, Taiclet Anne-France, Verrier Benoît. Revue des revues. In: Politix, vol. 14, n°55, Troisième trimestre 2001. Analyses politiques allemandes, sous la direction de Fabien Jobard et Pascale Laborier. pp. 195-215

Lire les sciences sociales. Volume 6/2008-2013

Lire les sciences sociales propose, depuis une vingtaine d'années, une sélection raisonnée de livres récents en sciences sociales. De façon générale, la présentation publique par des pairs est faite en présence des auteurs. Les livres retenus le sont, sans esprit de chapelle, en fonction de plusieurs critères (publication récente, en langue française, relevant des sciences sociales au sens large) et d'une conception de ce que sont des sciences sociales « intéressantes ou, en tout cas, qui valent la peine qu'on en débatte » : la confrontation d'une problématique à une enquête empirique et la production de schèmes d'interprétation transposables. Ce qui conduit à exclure les ouvrages purement empiriques ou relevant au contraire de la théorie la plus désincarnée. Refus de l'académisme et de l'essayisme, des frontières disciplinaires, des hiérarchies d'objets, des modes intellectuelles : Lire les sciences sociales esquisse, ce faisant, un modèle de critique scientifique autonome

Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study

Objectives Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking cessation during pregnancy, and their effects demonstrated. However, ethical critiques have included paternalism and lack of informed choice. Our objective was to determine if women and healthcare professionals (HPs) shared these concerns.Design Prospective qualitative research.Setting We included economically disadvantaged women, as defined by health insurance data, who participated in the French NAITRE randomised trial assessing a CCT programme during prenatal follow-up to improve pregnancy outcomes. The HP worked in some maternities participating in this trial.Participants 26 women, 14 who received CCT and 12 who did not, mostly unemployed (20/26), and - 7 HPs.Interventions We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study among women and HPs who participated in the NAITRE Study to assess their views on CCT. The women were interviewed after childbirth.Results Women did not perceive CCT negatively. They did not mention feeling stigmatised. They described CCT as a significant source of aid for women with limited financial resources. HP described the CCT in less positive terms, for example, expressing concern about discussing cash transfer at their first medical consultation with women. Though they emphasised ethical concerns about the basis of the trial, they recognised the importance of evaluating CCT.Conclusions In France, a high-income country where prenatal follow-up is free, HPs were concerned that the CCT programme would change their relationship with patients and wondered if it was the best use of funding. However, women who received a cash incentive said they did not feel stigmatised and indicated that these payments helped them prepare for their baby’s birth.Trial registration number NCT0240285